UPSC MainsPUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION-PAPER-II201610 Marks150 Words
Q1.

“The Regulating Act of 1773 not only introduced values in administration but also laid the foundation of centralized administration in India.” Explain.

How to Approach

The question requires a nuanced understanding of the Regulating Act of 1773. The approach should be to first establish the administrative chaos preceding the Act, then detail the provisions that introduced ‘values’ (accountability, oversight) and finally, explain how these provisions collectively laid the groundwork for a centralized administrative structure. Focus on the shift from a purely mercantile approach to a more structured governance model. Structure the answer chronologically, highlighting key features and their impact.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The East India Company’s initial foray into India was primarily driven by commercial interests, leading to a largely unregulated and exploitative administration. By the 1770s, this resulted in widespread corruption, inefficiency, and financial instability. The British Parliament, recognizing the need for greater control, enacted the Regulating Act of 1773. This landmark legislation was the first significant attempt to establish parliamentary control over the Company’s affairs and, crucially, introduced elements of accountability and a nascent form of centralized administration, moving away from the purely mercantile ethos that had previously prevailed.

Administrative Chaos Preceding the Act

Prior to 1773, the East India Company operated with considerable autonomy. The presidencies of Bengal, Madras, and Bombay functioned largely independently, leading to conflicts of jurisdiction, financial mismanagement, and a lack of coordinated policy. The dual system of governance in Bengal, established by Robert Clive, exacerbated these problems, creating opportunities for widespread corruption and exploitation. The Company’s primary focus remained profit maximization, with little regard for the welfare of the Indian population.

Introducing ‘Values’ in Administration

The Regulating Act of 1773 sought to address these issues by introducing several key provisions that can be considered ‘values’ in administration:

  • Governor-General of Bengal: The Act created the position of Governor-General of Bengal, with authority over the other presidencies in matters of war and peace. Warren Hastings was appointed as the first Governor-General. This was a crucial step towards consolidating power and establishing a unified command structure.
  • Executive Council: A four-member Executive Council was established to assist the Governor-General in decision-making. This introduced a degree of collective responsibility and deliberation.
  • Parliamentary Oversight: The Act mandated that the Company submit its political transactions to the British Parliament, increasing parliamentary scrutiny and accountability.
  • Establishment of a Supreme Court: A Supreme Court was established at Calcutta with jurisdiction over all British subjects in India. This aimed to provide a legal framework and ensure the rule of law, although its initial implementation was fraught with conflicts with the Company’s courts.

Laying the Foundation of Centralized Administration

The Act’s provisions, while limited in scope, laid the foundation for a centralized administrative structure in several ways:

  • Unified Command: The Governor-General’s authority over all presidencies, even if initially limited, represented a move towards a unified command structure. This was further strengthened by subsequent Acts.
  • Centralized Financial Control: While not fully realized immediately, the Act initiated a process of centralized financial control by requiring the Company to report its financial transactions to Parliament.
  • Bureaucratic Framework: The establishment of the Executive Council and the Supreme Court contributed to the development of a rudimentary bureaucratic framework.
  • Precedent for Intervention: The Act established a precedent for parliamentary intervention in the Company’s affairs, paving the way for greater control in the future.

However, it’s important to note that the centralization was not complete. The Company retained significant power, and the Governor-General’s authority was often challenged by the presidencies. The Act was also criticized for its ambiguity and the conflicts between the Governor-General, the Council, and the Supreme Court.

Feature Impact on Centralization
Governor-General of Bengal Established a single point of authority, initiating a unified command.
Executive Council Introduced collective decision-making, a step towards bureaucratic processes.
Parliamentary Oversight Increased accountability and paved the way for greater control.
Supreme Court Established a legal framework, contributing to the rule of law.

Conclusion

The Regulating Act of 1773, despite its limitations and initial shortcomings, was a pivotal moment in the history of British India. It marked a decisive shift from a purely commercial enterprise to a more structured governance model. By introducing elements of accountability, oversight, and a unified command structure, the Act not only instilled nascent ‘values’ in administration but also laid the crucial, albeit incomplete, foundation for the centralized administrative system that would eventually characterize British rule in India. It was the first step in a long process of parliamentary control and administrative reform.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Dual System of Governance
A system where the British East India Company controlled the ‘Diwani’ (revenue administration) and the Nawab of Bengal controlled the ‘Nizamat’ (police and judicial administration). This led to administrative chaos and corruption.
Nizamat
Refers to the administration of justice, police, and military affairs in Mughal and later British India. The Nawab of Bengal initially retained control over the Nizamat under the Dual System.

Key Statistics

The Company’s revenue in Bengal increased from £800,000 in 1765 to £1.8 million in 1773, highlighting the exploitative nature of the pre-Act administration.

Source: Datta, K.K. (1969). *The EIC and Bengal*. Orient Longman.

The Bengal famine of 1770, which resulted in an estimated 10 million deaths, was partly attributed to the exploitative revenue policies of the East India Company prior to the Regulating Act.

Source: Amartya Sen, *Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation* (1981)

Examples

Warren Hastings’ Impeachment

The impeachment of Warren Hastings (1787-1795) was a direct consequence of the perceived abuses of power during his tenure as Governor-General, stemming from the administrative weaknesses exposed by the Regulating Act and the subsequent scrutiny by Parliament.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was the Regulating Act of 1773 successful in completely curbing corruption?

No, the Act did not immediately eliminate corruption. It laid the groundwork for greater accountability, but the Company continued to engage in exploitative practices. The Act’s provisions were often circumvented, and the conflicts between different authorities hindered its effectiveness.

Topics Covered

HistoryPolityBritish RuleConstitutional DevelopmentAdministrative History