Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Edward Chamberlin, a pioneer in the study of monopolistic competition, challenged the traditional dichotomy between perfect competition and monopoly. He introduced the concept of ‘product differentiation’ and the ‘planned sales curve’ to explain firm and industry behavior in markets that lie between these two extremes. Unlike perfect competition, firms in monopolistic competition have some control over price due to differentiated products. However, this control is limited by the presence of many close substitutes. The planned sales curve, a crucial element of his model, illustrates how a firm anticipates its sales at different price levels, considering the demand elasticity and the reactions of competitors. This answer will detail how Chamberlin utilizes this curve to explain equilibrium at both the firm and group levels, accounting for free entry and exit.
Chamberlin’s Planned Sales Curve
The planned sales curve (PSC) represents the quantity a firm *expects* to sell at each possible price, assuming competitors’ prices remain constant. It’s derived from the firm’s individual demand curve, but it’s not the same. The individual demand curve shows sales at different prices *given* competitors’ prices. The PSC is a more proactive estimate. It’s flatter than the demand curve because the firm anticipates that lowering its price will attract sales not only from its existing demand but also from competitors. The PSC is tangent to the Average Cost (AC) curve at the point of equilibrium.
Equilibrium of a Firm in the Short Run
In the short run, a firm under monopolistic competition maximizes profit where Marginal Revenue (MR) equals Marginal Cost (MC). This determines the profit-maximizing price and quantity. The firm’s position relative to the PSC and AC curve determines its profitability.
- Profit: If the PSC is above the AC curve at the profit-maximizing quantity, the firm earns economic profits.
- Loss: If the PSC is below the AC curve, the firm incurs losses.
- Break-even: If the PSC is tangent to the AC curve, the firm earns normal profits (zero economic profit).
Equilibrium of the Industry Group in the Short Run
The industry group, consisting of all firms producing differentiated but similar products, is characterized by a downward-sloping demand curve. In the short run, the industry group can earn supernormal profits if the demand is high and costs are low. However, this situation attracts new entrants.
Entry of Firms and Long-Run Equilibrium
The key feature of Chamberlin’s model is the assumption of free entry and exit. When firms in the industry are earning economic profits, new firms are incentivized to enter the market. This entry has several effects:
- Increase in the Number of Substitutes: New firms introduce more differentiated products, increasing the number of close substitutes available to consumers.
- Shift in Individual Firm Demand Curves: The demand curve facing each existing firm becomes more elastic (flatter) as consumers have more choices.
- Shift in Planned Sales Curve: The PSC for each firm shifts downward and becomes more elastic.
This process continues until economic profits are driven to zero. In the long-run equilibrium, the PSC is tangent to the AC curve at the minimum point of the AC curve. This means:
- Zero Economic Profit: Firms earn only normal profits.
- Productive Efficiency: Firms produce at the minimum point of their average cost curve, achieving productive efficiency.
- Allocative Efficiency: Price equals marginal cost (P=MC), achieving allocative efficiency. However, this is not achieved to the same degree as in perfect competition due to the presence of product differentiation.
Exit of Firms and Long-Run Adjustment
Conversely, if firms are incurring losses, some firms will exit the market. This reduces the number of substitutes, making the demand curve facing each remaining firm more inelastic (steeper). The PSC shifts upward and becomes less elastic. This process continues until losses are eliminated and firms earn normal profits.
Graphical Representation (Conceptual)
Imagine a graph with quantity on the x-axis and cost/price on the y-axis. The AC curve is U-shaped. The PSC is initially above the AC curve (short-run profit). As new firms enter, the PSC shifts downward until it becomes tangent to the AC curve at its minimum point (long-run equilibrium). The point of tangency represents the equilibrium price and quantity.
| Feature | Short Run | Long Run |
|---|---|---|
| Profit/Loss | Positive or Negative | Zero Economic Profit |
| Entry/Exit | No Entry/Exit | Free Entry/Exit |
| PSC Position | Above or Below AC | Tangent to AC at minimum point |
| Price | Determined by MR=MC | Determined by tangency of PSC and AC |
Conclusion
Chamberlin’s model of monopolistic competition, utilizing the planned sales curve, provides a realistic depiction of many markets. It demonstrates how firms balance the benefits of product differentiation with the competitive pressures of numerous substitutes. The free entry and exit mechanism ensures that economic profits are driven to zero in the long run, leading to a more efficient allocation of resources, although not perfectly efficient like in perfect competition. The model remains relevant today in understanding industries ranging from restaurants and clothing to hair salons and retail stores.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.