UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-I201710 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q10.

What are the two major legal initiatives by the State since Independence, addressing discrimination against Scheduled Tribes (STs)? (150 words)

How to Approach

The question requires identifying and elaborating on two major legal initiatives post-Independence aimed at addressing discrimination against Scheduled Tribes (STs). A direct answer focusing on the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and the Forest Rights Act, 2006, is expected. The answer should briefly explain the context of discrimination, the provisions of each Act, and their significance in protecting ST rights. A structured approach – introduction, detailed explanation of each Act, and conclusion – will be effective.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

India’s Constitution recognizes Scheduled Tribes as historically disadvantaged communities facing socio-economic and educational discrimination. Despite constitutional safeguards, systemic discrimination persisted, necessitating specific legal interventions. Post-Independence, the State enacted several laws to address these injustices. Two landmark initiatives stand out for their comprehensive approach: the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, designed to prevent and punish atrocities against these communities, and the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, aimed at rectifying historical injustices concerning their forest rights. These acts represent significant steps towards ensuring social justice and equitable development for STs.

The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

Enacted in response to increasing incidents of atrocities against SCs and STs, this Act aims to prevent the commission of offences of atrocities and to provide relief and rehabilitation to the victims.

  • Provisions: The Act defines ‘atrocities’ broadly, encompassing offences like preventing the use of public facilities, causing physical harm, sexual exploitation, and economic deprivation. It prescribes stringent punishments, including life imprisonment and fines.
  • Amendments: The Act was amended in 2015 to include offences against religious or cultural practices, and to enhance the scope of rehabilitation measures. Further amendments in 2019 overruled a Supreme Court judgment that diluted the provisions regarding anticipatory bail, reaffirming the Act’s original intent.
  • Significance: The Act provides a legal framework for addressing and punishing crimes motivated by caste-based discrimination, offering a degree of protection and justice to vulnerable communities.

The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006

This Act, often referred to as the Forest Rights Act (FRA), acknowledges the historical injustices committed against STs and other traditional forest dwellers in the management of forests. It seeks to redress these wrongs by recognizing their individual and community forest rights.

  • Provisions: The FRA recognizes four categories of rights: (1) Rights to land and habitation; (2) Rights to use of minor forest produce (MFP); (3) Rights of habitat; and (4) Rights to conservation and management of forests.
  • Implementation: The Act mandates the formation of Gram Sabhas and Forest Rights Committees (FRCs) at the village level to identify and verify claims of forest rights.
  • Significance: FRA empowers STs by granting them legal rights over forest resources, promoting their livelihoods, and fostering sustainable forest management. It also recognizes their traditional knowledge and cultural practices.

The implementation of both Acts has faced challenges. The Atrocities Act suffers from low conviction rates due to issues like underreporting, lack of evidence, and social biases. FRA implementation has been slow due to bureaucratic hurdles, lack of awareness, and resistance from forest departments. Despite these challenges, these Acts remain crucial legal tools for protecting the rights and promoting the welfare of Scheduled Tribes.

Conclusion

The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and the Forest Rights Act, 2006, represent pivotal legal interventions in addressing historical and ongoing discrimination against Scheduled Tribes in India. While implementation challenges persist, these Acts provide a vital framework for safeguarding their rights, promoting social justice, and ensuring their equitable participation in the nation’s development. Continued efforts towards effective implementation, awareness generation, and addressing systemic biases are crucial for realizing the full potential of these landmark legislations.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Atrocity
As defined in the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, an atrocity refers to any act of violence or discrimination directed against members of Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes due to their caste identity.
Minor Forest Produce (MFP)
MFP includes all non-timber forest products like bamboo, tendu leaves, honey, medicinal plants, and lac, which are traditionally collected by forest dwellers for livelihood.

Key Statistics

According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data (2022), there were 50,900 cases registered under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, representing a 9.1% increase from 2021.

Source: NCRB, Crime in India Report 2022

As of December 2023, approximately 4.9 million individual forest rights and 15,344 community forest rights have been recognized under the FRA across India.

Source: Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Annual Report 2023-24 (based on knowledge cutoff)

Examples

Bhima Koregaon Incident

The violence at Bhima Koregaon in Maharashtra (2018) highlighted the continued vulnerability of Dalits and Adivasis to caste-based attacks, underscoring the need for effective implementation of the Atrocities Act.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of Gram Sabhas in the implementation of the Forest Rights Act?

Gram Sabhas play a crucial role in identifying and verifying claims of forest rights, resolving disputes, and monitoring the implementation of the FRA at the local level. They are the primary institutions responsible for ensuring the participation of forest dwellers in the process.

Topics Covered

PolitySocial IssuesTribal RightsConstitutional LawSocial Justice