Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The Satluj-Yamuna Link (SYL) Canal project is a long-standing dispute concerning the sharing of water from the Satluj and Yamuna rivers between Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan. Conceived in 1983 following the Eradi Tribunal award, the project aimed to allocate surplus waters of the Ravi-Beas rivers to Haryana and Rajasthan. However, its implementation has been fraught with inter-state conflicts, primarily stemming from Punjab’s objections based on riparian rights, altered river flows, and concerns over water availability. The SYL canal remains incomplete, becoming a significant point of contention in the water politics of the region.
Background of the SYL Canal Project
The genesis of the SYL canal lies in the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960. This treaty allocated the waters of the Indus system to India and Pakistan. To equitably distribute the waters within India, particularly the Ravi and Beas rivers, successive agreements and tribunals were established. The Eradi Tribunal, constituted in 1987, awarded 75% of the surplus waters to Haryana and 25% to Rajasthan. The SYL canal was designed to link the Satluj and Yamuna rivers, enabling the transfer of these allocated waters.
Inter-State Issues and Disputes
Punjab’s Objections
- Riparian Rights: Punjab argues that as an upper riparian state, it has the first right to the waters of the Satluj and Beas rivers. It contends that diverting water to Haryana and Rajasthan would negatively impact its own agricultural needs and ecological balance.
- Decreased River Flows: Punjab claims that the river flows have significantly decreased since the Eradi Tribunal award due to climate change and upstream interventions in Himachal Pradesh, rendering the surplus water allocation inaccurate.
- Constitutional Validity: Punjab has challenged the constitutional validity of the notifications issued for the acquisition of land for the canal’s construction, citing violations of federal principles.
- Political Opposition: Successive Punjab governments have consistently opposed the project, often enacting legislation to nullify previous agreements and refusing to cooperate with the construction.
Haryana’s Claims
Haryana asserts its legitimate right to the allocated share of water as per the Eradi Tribunal award. It argues that the completion of the SYL canal is crucial for addressing its water scarcity, particularly in its agricultural regions. Haryana has repeatedly approached the Supreme Court seeking the completion of the canal and the enforcement of the tribunal’s award.
Rajasthan’s Dependence
Rajasthan, being a desert state, relies heavily on the allocated share of water from the Ravi-Beas rivers for irrigation and drinking water purposes. The delay in the completion of the SYL canal has hindered its water security and agricultural development.
Legal Battles and Supreme Court Interventions
The SYL canal dispute has been subject to numerous legal battles. The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled in favor of the completion of the canal, declaring the Punjab Termination of Agreements Act, 2004 (which repealed previous agreements related to the canal) as unconstitutional in 2016. However, despite these rulings, Punjab has remained reluctant to implement the project.
Constitutional Provisions Involved
- Article 262: Deals with the adjudication of disputes relating to the use of waters of inter-state rivers or river valleys.
- Entry 17 of List I (Union List): Gives the Union government the power to regulate inter-state rivers.
- Entry 14 of List II (State List): Gives state governments the power to regulate intra-state rivers.
Current Status and Potential Solutions
As of late 2023, the SYL canal remains incomplete. The central government has attempted mediation and offered financial assistance to Punjab for the completion of the project, but these efforts have yielded limited success. Potential solutions include:
- Renegotiation: A fresh agreement among the three states, taking into account current water availability and changing socio-economic conditions.
- Central Intervention: Stronger intervention by the central government, potentially invoking its constitutional powers to enforce the Supreme Court’s rulings.
- Water Management Strategies: Implementing integrated water resource management strategies, including rainwater harvesting, groundwater recharge, and efficient irrigation techniques, to reduce overall water demand.
| State | Position on SYL Canal | Key Concerns |
|---|---|---|
| Punjab | Opposes completion | Riparian rights, decreased river flows, constitutional validity |
| Haryana | Supports completion | Water scarcity, agricultural needs, tribunal award |
| Rajasthan | Supports completion | Water security, irrigation, desert conditions |
Conclusion
The Satluj-Yamuna Link Canal project exemplifies the complexities of inter-state water disputes in India. The ongoing conflict highlights the need for a holistic and cooperative approach to water resource management, considering the legitimate concerns of all stakeholders. While legal rulings have favored the completion of the canal, a lasting solution requires political will, mutual trust, and a willingness to renegotiate based on current realities. Addressing this issue is crucial not only for the water security of the concerned states but also for fostering harmonious inter-state relations.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.