UPSC MainsGEOLOGY-PAPER-II201710 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q28.

What do you understand by incompatibility of elements? Comment upon High Field Strength (HFS) and Large Ion Lithophile (LIL) elements.

How to Approach

This question requires a detailed understanding of geochemical behavior during magmatic processes. The approach should begin by defining element incompatibility and its relation to crystal-melt partitioning. Then, specifically address High Field Strength Elements (HFSE) and Large Ion Lithophile Elements (LIL), detailing their geochemical characteristics, behavior during partial melting and fractional crystallization, and their use as tracers for mantle processes. Structure the answer into introduction, body (defining incompatibility, HFSE, LIL, their contrasting behaviors), and conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Element incompatibility is a fundamental concept in petrology and geochemistry, governing the distribution of elements between minerals and melts during magmatic processes. It arises from the size and charge of an element not fitting well into the crystal structure of common rock-forming minerals. This leads to preferential partitioning into the melt phase, resulting in enrichment in the melt and depletion in the solid residue. Understanding the behavior of different element groups, particularly High Field Strength Elements (HFSE) and Large Ion Lithophile Elements (LIL), is crucial for deciphering the origin and evolution of magmas and the composition of the Earth’s mantle.

Understanding Element Incompatibility

Element incompatibility is quantified by the partition coefficient (Kd), which represents the ratio of an element’s concentration in a solid phase (mineral) to its concentration in the melt phase. A Kd value less than 1 indicates incompatibility, meaning the element prefers the melt. The degree of incompatibility is related to ionic radius, charge, and the crystal structure of the mineral. Elements with large ionic radii or high charge are generally incompatible in most common silicate minerals.

High Field Strength Elements (HFSE)

HFSE are characterized by high ionic charge (+3 to +5) and relatively small ionic radii. This combination results in strong bonding to oxygen, leading to high field strengths. Common HFSE include Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf, Ti, and REE (Rare Earth Elements). Despite their high charge, HFSE exhibit varying degrees of incompatibility.

  • Geochemical Behavior: HFSE are generally considered incompatible in most mantle minerals like olivine, orthopyroxene, and clinopyroxene. However, they can be accommodated in accessory minerals like apatite, zircon, and titanite.
  • During Magmatic Processes: During partial melting, HFSE are preferentially partitioned into the melt, leading to enrichment in the magma. Fractional crystallization can further concentrate HFSE in the residual melt.
  • Tectonic Significance: The behavior of HFSE is used to understand mantle metasomatism and the origin of different magma types. For example, enrichment in Nb and Ta is often associated with subduction-related magmatism.

Large Ion Lithophile Elements (LIL)

LIL elements have large ionic radii and low charge (+1 or +2). This leads to weaker bonding to oxygen and a strong preference for the melt phase. Common LIL elements include K, Rb, Cs, Ba, and Sr.

  • Geochemical Behavior: LIL elements are highly incompatible in most mantle minerals. They are readily accommodated in the melt phase and are strongly influenced by the presence of water and other volatiles.
  • During Magmatic Processes: LIL elements are significantly enriched in the melt during partial melting. Fractional crystallization leads to a strong concentration of LIL elements in late-stage fluids and residual melts. Sr and Ba can be accommodated in plagioclase feldspar, but are still generally considered incompatible.
  • Tectonic Significance: LIL element ratios (e.g., Rb/Sr) are used to determine the age of rocks using radiometric dating methods. Enrichment in LIL elements is often associated with continental crustal contamination of magmas.

Contrasting Behaviors: HFSE vs. LIL

The contrasting behaviors of HFSE and LIL elements provide valuable insights into magmatic processes. HFSE are less affected by the presence of fluids and are more resistant to alteration, making them reliable tracers of mantle sources. LIL elements, on the other hand, are highly mobile and are easily affected by fluid-rock interaction and crustal contamination.

Feature HFSE LIL
Ionic Charge +3 to +5 +1 or +2
Ionic Radius Small Large
Bonding Strength Strong Weak
Incompatibility Moderate to High Very High
Fluid Mobility Low High
Examples Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf K, Rb, Cs, Ba, Sr

Conclusion

In conclusion, element incompatibility is a key principle governing the behavior of elements during magmatic processes. HFSE and LIL elements, due to their distinct geochemical properties, exhibit contrasting behaviors and serve as powerful tracers for understanding mantle composition, magma evolution, and tectonic settings. Analyzing the concentrations and ratios of these elements in rocks provides crucial information about the origin and history of magmas, contributing significantly to our understanding of Earth’s dynamic processes.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Partition Coefficient (Kd)
The ratio of an element’s concentration in one phase (e.g., mineral) to its concentration in another phase (e.g., melt) at equilibrium. Kd = [Element]mineral / [Element]melt.
Metasomatism
The alteration of rock mineralogy by the introduction or removal of chemical components through fluid interaction. This process significantly affects the distribution of incompatible elements.

Key Statistics

The Earth’s continental crust is enriched in LIL elements (e.g., Rb, Ba, K) compared to the mantle, with average crustal abundances being 10-100 times higher than mantle abundances (Taylor & McLennan, 1985).

Source: Taylor, S. R., & McLennan, S. M. (1985). The continental crust: its composition and evolution. Prentice-Hall.

The concentration of Uranium (U) and Thorium (Th), both incompatible elements, are approximately 5-10 times higher in the continental crust compared to the upper mantle (Rudnick & Fountain, 1995).

Source: Rudnick, R. L., & Fountain, D. M. (1995). The composition of the continental crust. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59(9), 1173-1200.

Examples

Ocean Island Basalts (OIB)

OIB, originating from mantle plumes, often exhibit enrichment in HFSE like Nb and Ta, indicating a source region that has been metasomatized by fluids derived from subducted slabs.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does pressure affect element incompatibility?

Increasing pressure generally decreases the size of ionic radii, potentially increasing the compatibility of some elements in minerals. However, the effect is complex and depends on the specific element and mineral involved.

Topics Covered

GeologyGeochemistryPetrologyTrace element geochemistryMagmatic processesGeochemical evolution