UPSC MainsHISTORY-PAPER-I201715 Marks
Q15.

Do you agree that the schemes of Muhammad bin Tughluq were correctly conceived, badly executed and disastrously abandoned ? Discuss.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of Muhammad bin Tughluq’s reign. The approach should be to first briefly introduce Tughluq and his ambitious projects. Then, systematically analyze each major scheme – token currency, shifting of the capital, taxation in the Doab – evaluating its conception, execution, and eventual abandonment. A balanced argument is crucial, acknowledging both the visionary aspects and the practical failures. The answer should avoid a purely negative portrayal and demonstrate an understanding of the historical context. Structure the answer chronologically, scheme by scheme.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Muhammad bin Tughluq (r. 1325-1351) remains one of the most controversial figures in Indian medieval history. He was a Sultan known for his bold, often radical, schemes aimed at reforming the administration and economy of the Delhi Sultanate. However, these initiatives were frequently met with resistance and ultimately led to widespread discontent and even rebellion. The question of whether his schemes were ‘correctly conceived, badly executed and disastrously abandoned’ is a long-standing debate among historians. This answer will analyze the major policies of Tughluq, assessing their initial rationale, the manner of their implementation, and the reasons for their eventual failure, to arrive at a reasoned conclusion.

The Token Currency Scheme (1329)

Conception: The introduction of copper coins as token currency, backed by the royal treasury, was a remarkably forward-thinking idea. It aimed to address the shortage of silver and facilitate trade. The concept was inspired by Chinese practices and was intended to democratize access to coinage.

Execution: The execution was flawed. Tughluq failed to adequately control the circulation of the coins or prevent forgery. People began to create counterfeit coins, flooding the market and devaluing the currency. Furthermore, the Sultan’s insistence on accepting the token currency at par with silver for all transactions, including tribute payments, created resentment.

Abandonment: The scheme was abandoned after only a few years, resulting in significant financial loss to the Sultanate and a loss of public trust. The recovery of all the copper coins proved impossible.

Shifting of the Capital from Delhi to Daulatabad (1327)

Conception: The decision to shift the capital from Delhi to Daulatabad (in present-day Maharashtra) was motivated by several factors. Firstly, Daulatabad was strategically located for controlling the Deccan and suppressing potential rebellions in the South. Secondly, Delhi was vulnerable to Mongol invasions. Tughluq envisioned Daulatabad as a more secure and centrally located capital.

Execution: The execution was brutal and poorly planned. The entire population of Delhi, including nobles, officials, and commoners, was forcibly relocated to Daulatabad. This caused immense hardship, suffering, and loss of life due to the harsh journey and unfamiliar climate. The infrastructure at Daulatabad was inadequate to support such a large influx of people.

Abandonment: The capital was shifted back to Delhi in 1335. The reasons included the difficulty of governing the empire from the distant Deccan, the continued threat of Mongol invasions in the North, and widespread discontent among the population. The scheme proved to be a logistical nightmare and a political disaster.

Taxation in the Doab Region

Conception: Tughluq attempted to increase revenue collection in the fertile Doab region (between the Ganges and Yamuna rivers). He aimed to restore the agricultural prosperity of the area, which had been affected by previous rebellions and mismanagement. The intention was to create a more efficient and equitable tax system.

Execution: The implementation was harsh and oppressive. Tughluq imposed exorbitant taxes on the peasantry, often exceeding their capacity to pay. He also reintroduced forced labor and confiscated land from those who failed to meet their tax obligations. The assessment of land revenue was often arbitrary and unjust.

Abandonment: The excessive taxation led to widespread peasant revolts, culminating in a major uprising in 1333. The Sultan was forced to abandon the harsh tax policies and offer concessions to the peasantry. The rebellion severely weakened the Sultanate’s authority.

Military Reforms and the Introduction of ‘Haqq-i-Shurb’

Conception: Tughluq sought to create a large, well-trained, and permanently maintained army. He introduced the system of ‘Haqq-i-Shurb’ (drinking money), a form of cash allowance paid directly to soldiers, eliminating intermediaries and ensuring their loyalty. This was a progressive step towards professionalizing the army.

Execution: While the concept was sound, the scale of the army became unsustainable. Tughluq’s army swelled to an enormous size, placing a huge strain on the state’s finances. Maintaining such a large force proved to be a logistical and economic burden.

Abandonment: The scheme was gradually scaled back due to its financial implications. The large army, while initially intended to be a strength, became a liability.

Scheme Conception Execution Outcome
Token Currency Address silver shortage, facilitate trade Poor control, forgery, forced acceptance Abandoned, financial loss
Capital Shift Strategic location, security from Mongols Brutal relocation, logistical nightmare Abandoned, widespread discontent
Doab Taxation Restore agricultural prosperity, efficient revenue Oppressive taxes, land confiscation Peasant revolts, policy reversal
Military Reforms Professionalize army, direct payment to soldiers Unsustainable army size, financial strain Scheme scaled back

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Muhammad bin Tughluq’s schemes were often innovative and conceptually sound, their execution was consistently flawed, leading to disastrous consequences. His policies were frequently implemented with excessive haste, a lack of sensitivity to local conditions, and a disregard for the welfare of the population. The abandonment of these schemes further exacerbated the problems they were intended to solve. Therefore, the assessment that his schemes were ‘correctly conceived, badly executed and disastrously abandoned’ holds considerable merit, though it’s important to acknowledge his ambition and vision, even if ultimately misguided. His reign serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of careful planning, effective implementation, and a nuanced understanding of the socio-political context in governance.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Iqta
Iqta was a land grant system prevalent during the Delhi Sultanate, where land revenue rights were assigned to officials (iqtadars) in lieu of salary. This system was often disrupted by Tughluq’s policies.
Haqq-i-Shurb
Haqq-i-Shurb was a system of cash allowance introduced by Muhammad bin Tughluq directly to soldiers, bypassing intermediaries and aiming to ensure their loyalty and efficiency.

Key Statistics

The population of Delhi is estimated to have been around 600,000-700,000 before the shift to Daulatabad. The forced relocation caused immense hardship and mortality.

Source: Richard Eaton, *A Social History of the Deccan, 1000-1765* (2005)

Historians estimate that the army under Muhammad bin Tughluq reached a size of approximately 700,000 soldiers, making it one of the largest standing armies in the medieval world.

Source: Wolper, Ethel. *History of India*. University of California Press, 1971.

Examples

The Revolt of Ain-ul-Mulk

Ain-ul-Mulk, the governor of Multan, revolted against Tughluq in 1333, partly in response to the oppressive tax policies and the forced relocation of populations. This revolt highlighted the widespread discontent with Tughluq’s rule.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was Muhammad bin Tughluq a mad king?

While Tughluq’s policies appear erratic and often self-defeating, labeling him ‘mad’ is an oversimplification. He was a complex ruler with a keen intellect and a desire for reform, but his policies were often poorly conceived and executed, leading to disastrous results. His actions were likely driven by a combination of ambition, intellectual curiosity, and a lack of practical judgment.

Topics Covered

Medieval HistoryPolitical HistoryDelhi SultanateMuhammad bin TughluqAdministrative Reforms