Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The debate regarding the primacy of rights versus duties is a foundational one in political philosophy, deeply intertwined with the concept of accountability. Historically, the notion of duties often preceded rights, stemming from hierarchical social structures where obligations were dictated by status. However, the Enlightenment ushered in an era emphasizing individual rights as inherent and inalienable. Accountability, in its broadest sense, refers to the obligation to justify actions and decisions. The question of whether rights or duties are prior fundamentally shapes how we understand and enforce accountability – whether it’s a bottom-up demand for rights fulfillment or a top-down expectation of duty performance.
Historical and Philosophical Perspectives
Early political thought, exemplified by Thomas Hobbes in *Leviathan* (1651), prioritized duty. Hobbes argued that individuals surrender certain rights to a sovereign in exchange for security, making duty to the sovereign paramount. This perspective emphasizes order and stability, with accountability flowing *from* the sovereign *to* the people only insofar as the sovereign maintains security. Conversely, John Locke, in *Two Treatises of Government* (1689), posited natural rights – life, liberty, and property – as pre-existing and inherent. For Locke, government’s legitimacy rested on protecting these rights, making the government accountable *to* the people. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in *The Social Contract* (1762), attempted a synthesis, arguing that individuals surrender some rights to the ‘general will’ but retain the right to participate in shaping that will, thus creating a reciprocal relationship of rights and duties.
The Interdependence of Rights and Duties
A purely rights-based approach, without acknowledging corresponding duties, can lead to a culture of entitlement and a weakening of social cohesion. If individuals focus solely on claiming their rights, without fulfilling their obligations to society, accountability mechanisms become ineffective. For example, the right to free speech does not absolve individuals of the duty to avoid hate speech or defamation. Similarly, a purely duty-based approach, neglecting rights, can result in oppression and the denial of fundamental freedoms. The Indian Constitution, while enshrining fundamental rights (Part III), also imposes fundamental duties (Part IVA, added by the 86th Amendment Act, 2002), recognizing this interdependence.
Accountability and the Primacy Debate
The question of primacy impacts how accountability is structured. If duties are prioritized, accountability is often hierarchical and imposed *on* individuals by authority. This is common in bureaucratic systems where officials are accountable to their superiors. However, if rights are prioritized, accountability becomes more democratic and participatory, with citizens holding the state accountable for fulfilling its obligations. The Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, exemplifies this, empowering citizens to demand information from public authorities, thereby enhancing accountability.
Contemporary Challenges
In the context of globalization and transnational governance, the debate becomes more complex. Multinational corporations, for instance, often operate beyond the reach of national accountability mechanisms. The question arises: do they have duties to respect human rights and environmental standards, even in jurisdictions where such standards are weak? The increasing emphasis on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reflects a growing recognition of such duties. Furthermore, the rise of digital technologies presents new challenges to accountability, with issues like data privacy and algorithmic bias requiring a re-evaluation of rights and duties in the digital realm.
| Perspective | Emphasis | Accountability Structure |
|---|---|---|
| Hobbesian | Duties to the Sovereign | Top-down, Hierarchical |
| Lockean | Individual Rights | Bottom-up, Citizen-centric |
| Rousseauian | Reciprocal Rights & Duties | Participatory, Democratic |
Conclusion
Ultimately, neither rights nor duties can be considered absolutely prior to the other. They are two sides of the same coin, mutually reinforcing and essential for a just and accountable society. A balanced approach, recognizing the inherent dignity of individuals and their obligations to the community, is crucial. Strengthening accountability mechanisms requires not only the effective enforcement of rights but also the cultivation of a sense of civic duty and responsibility among all members of society. Moving forward, a focus on ethical frameworks that integrate both rights and duties will be vital for navigating the complex challenges of the 21st century.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.