UPSC MainsPHILOSOPHY-PAPER-II201720 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q6.

Do you agree with the view that secularism as a western ideal is redundant in the Indian context ? Discuss in the context of the multicultural Indian society.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of secularism, both as a Western concept and its adaptation in the Indian context. The answer should avoid a simplistic 'yes' or 'no' response. It needs to explore the historical development of secularism in India, the unique challenges posed by its multiculturalism, and whether the Indian model represents a departure or a successful adaptation of the Western ideal. Structure the answer by first defining secularism, then outlining its Western origins, followed by its Indian interpretation, and finally, a critical assessment of its relevance in the Indian context.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Secularism, at its core, signifies the principle of state neutrality towards religion, ensuring equal respect for all faiths and the freedom of religious belief. Originating in Europe as a response to religious conflicts, it aimed to separate religious authority from political power. However, the application of this concept varies significantly across nations. In India, secularism has been a subject of continuous debate since independence, particularly given its extraordinarily diverse religious and cultural landscape. The question of whether the Western model of secularism is redundant in India stems from the argument that India’s unique socio-political realities necessitate a distinct approach to managing religious diversity and state-religion relations.

The Western Conception of Secularism

The Western understanding of secularism, largely shaped by the Enlightenment, generally emphasizes a strict separation of church and state. This often translates into a ‘wall of separation’ where religious institutions have minimal influence on public policy and the state refrains from endorsing or favoring any particular religion. This model, prevalent in countries like France (laïcité) and the United States (First Amendment), prioritizes individual religious freedom within a private sphere, minimizing the public display of religious symbols and practices. Historically, this arose from conflicts between Protestant and Catholic factions in Europe, leading to a desire for a neutral state.

The Indian Adaptation of Secularism

India adopted secularism as a constitutional principle, enshrined in the Preamble and Articles 25-28 of the Constitution. However, the Indian model, often termed ‘Sarva Dharma Sambhava’ (equal respect for all religions), differs significantly from the Western model. Instead of a strict separation, it advocates for state engagement with all religions, providing equal protection and fostering interfaith harmony. This approach is rooted in India’s historical tradition of religious pluralism and syncretism.

  • Article 25: Guarantees freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion.
  • Article 26: Deals with religious matters, allowing religious organizations to manage their affairs.
  • Article 27: Prohibits compelling any person to pay taxes for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion.
  • Article 28: Prohibits religious instruction in state-funded educational institutions.

The state actively participates in religious festivals, provides funding for religious institutions (though debated), and regulates religious practices through laws like the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937. This engagement is seen as necessary to maintain social cohesion in a deeply religious society.

Why the Western Model May Be Redundant in the Indian Context

Several factors suggest that a strict Western-style secularism is ill-suited for India:

  • Multiculturalism & Religious Diversity: India is home to a vast array of religions, castes, and communities, each with its own unique traditions and practices. A rigid separation could alienate significant segments of the population.
  • Historical Context: Unlike the historical conflicts in Europe, India’s religious diversity has largely been characterized by coexistence and syncretism, although not without instances of conflict.
  • Social Fabric: Religion plays a pervasive role in Indian social life, influencing personal laws, customs, and social norms. Attempting to completely separate religion from public life could disrupt the social fabric.
  • Political Realities: Political parties often appeal to religious identities for electoral gains, making a truly neutral stance difficult to achieve.

Challenges to Indian Secularism & Contemporary Debates

Despite its unique adaptation, Indian secularism faces several challenges:

  • Communalism: The rise of communal politics and religious polarization threatens the principles of equality and non-discrimination.
  • Minority Rights: Concerns regarding the protection of minority rights and the increasing instances of religious intolerance.
  • Uniform Civil Code (UCC): The debate surrounding the UCC highlights the tension between secularism and religious personal laws. (Article 44 of the Directive Principles of State Policy)
  • State Funding of Religious Institutions: The continued state funding of religious institutions is often criticized as a violation of secular principles.

Recent debates surrounding issues like the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), 2019, and the abrogation of Article 370 have further intensified concerns about the erosion of secular values in India. These events have raised questions about the state’s neutrality and its commitment to protecting the rights of all citizens, regardless of their religion.

Feature Western Secularism Indian Secularism
State-Religion Relationship Strict Separation State Engagement with all Religions
Public Display of Religion Minimized Accepted and Accommodated
Focus Individual Religious Freedom (Private Sphere) Interfaith Harmony & Social Cohesion
Historical Context Religious Conflicts Religious Pluralism & Syncretism

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the Western model of secularism provides a valuable framework for understanding the relationship between state and religion, it is arguably redundant in the Indian context due to the country’s unique historical, social, and political realities. The Indian model of ‘Sarva Dharma Sambhava’, despite its challenges, represents a pragmatic attempt to manage religious diversity and promote social harmony. However, continuous vigilance and a renewed commitment to constitutional values are crucial to safeguard the principles of secularism and ensure equal rights and opportunities for all citizens in India’s multicultural society. The ongoing debates surrounding UCC and minority rights necessitate a nuanced and inclusive approach to secularism, one that balances individual freedoms with the collective well-being of the nation.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Sarva Dharma Sambhava
A Hindi phrase meaning "equal respect for all religions," representing the core principle of Indian secularism.
Laïcité
The French principle of secularism, characterized by a strict separation of church and state and a commitment to neutrality in public life.

Key Statistics

As per the 2011 Census of India, Hinduism is practiced by 79.8% of the population, Islam by 14.2%, Christianity by 2.3%, Sikhism by 1.7%, Buddhism by 0.7%, and Jainism by 0.4%.

Source: Census of India, 2011

According to the Pew Research Center (2021), India has the largest Muslim population in the world after Indonesia, with approximately 200 million Muslims.

Source: Pew Research Center, 2021

Examples

Babri Masjid Demolition (1992)

The demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya in 1992 is a stark example of communal tensions and the challenges to secularism in India. It highlighted the dangers of religious polarization and the need for strong state intervention to protect religious harmony.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Indian model of secularism truly secular?

This is a contentious debate. Critics argue that state engagement with religion compromises neutrality. Proponents contend that it’s a pragmatic adaptation necessary for a deeply religious society, fostering inclusivity rather than alienation.

Topics Covered

Political ScienceIndian PolitySociologySecularismIndian SocietyMulticulturalismReligion