UPSC MainsPSYCHOLOGY-PAPER-I201710 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q1.

Describe how you used psychology to solve a social problem.

How to Approach

This question requires a personal reflection on applying psychological principles to address a real-world social issue. The answer should demonstrate understanding of relevant psychological theories and their practical application. Structure the answer by first identifying a social problem, then detailing the psychological principles used, the intervention implemented, and the observed outcomes. Focus on a specific, manageable instance rather than attempting to tackle a large-scale issue broadly. A clear articulation of the process and the rationale behind the chosen approach is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Social problems, often rooted in complex human behaviors and interactions, present significant challenges to societal well-being. Psychology, as the scientific study of the mind and behavior, offers a powerful toolkit for understanding and addressing these issues. The concept of ‘prosocial behavior’, defined as actions intended to benefit others, is central to many interventions. Recently, there has been increased focus on utilizing behavioral insights to nudge positive social change. I utilized principles of social psychology to address the issue of low participation in community cleanliness drives in my locality, a problem exacerbated by a diffusion of responsibility and lack of perceived collective efficacy.

Identifying the Problem & Initial Assessment

My locality, a residential area with a population of approximately 5000, suffered from consistent littering and a lack of participation in monthly community cleanliness drives organized by the Residents Welfare Association (RWA). Initial observation revealed that while residents acknowledged the problem, participation rates remained consistently low (around 10-15%). Informal conversations suggested a belief that “someone else will take care of it” – a classic example of the bystander effect and diffusion of responsibility.

Applying Psychological Principles

I identified several key psychological principles that could be leveraged:

  • Social Norms: People are heavily influenced by what they perceive as normal behavior.
  • Collective Efficacy: A group’s shared belief in its ability to accomplish a task. Low collective efficacy leads to inaction.
  • Foot-in-the-Door Technique: A persuasion technique where a small request is followed by a larger one.
  • Public Commitment: Making a public pledge increases the likelihood of following through.

The Intervention: A Multi-pronged Approach

Based on these principles, I designed a three-phase intervention:

Phase 1: Normative Influence & Awareness (Week 1-2)

We created visually appealing posters displaying the percentage of residents *already* participating in the cleanliness drives (initially a low number, but presented positively). The posters emphasized that “Most of your neighbors are contributing to a cleaner community.” This aimed to establish a descriptive social norm. We also organized a small awareness campaign highlighting the benefits of a clean environment and the importance of collective action.

Phase 2: Building Collective Efficacy (Week 3-4)

We organized a small-scale, highly visible cleanup event focusing on a particularly littered area. We deliberately involved a small group of influential residents (doctors, teachers, local business owners) to demonstrate leadership and build momentum. Photographs and short videos of the event were widely circulated on the RWA’s WhatsApp group and social media pages, showcasing the positive impact of collective effort.

Phase 3: Public Commitment & Sustained Engagement (Week 5 onwards)

We introduced a “Cleanliness Pledge” form, asking residents to publicly commit to participating in at least one cleanliness drive per quarter. Residents who signed the pledge received a small token of appreciation (a reusable shopping bag). We also implemented a system of recognizing and appreciating volunteers publicly during RWA meetings.

Results & Evaluation

The intervention yielded significant positive results. Participation rates in the cleanliness drives increased from 10-15% to 40-50% within three months. Informal feedback from residents indicated a heightened sense of community ownership and responsibility. The RWA reported a noticeable decrease in littering incidents. While a formal quantitative evaluation was not conducted due to resource constraints, the observed changes were substantial and sustained over the following six months.

Metric Before Intervention After Intervention (3 months)
Participation Rate 10-15% 40-50%
Reported Littering Incidents (RWA data) High Moderate

Conclusion

This experience demonstrated the practical applicability of psychological principles in addressing real-world social problems. By strategically leveraging social norms, collective efficacy, and behavioral techniques, we were able to significantly increase community participation in cleanliness drives and foster a greater sense of collective responsibility. The success highlights the importance of understanding human behavior and designing interventions that are tailored to specific social contexts. Further research with more rigorous evaluation methods would be beneficial to replicate and refine these findings.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Diffusion of Responsibility
A psychological phenomenon where individuals are less likely to take action in an emergency or contribute to a cause when other people are present, assuming someone else will intervene.
Prosocial Behavior
Any act performed with the primary goal of benefiting another person, rather than oneself. This includes a wide range of actions, from simple acts of kindness to heroic self-sacrifice.

Key Statistics

According to the Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban) report 2023, approximately 78.8% of urban areas in India have been declared Open Defecation Free (ODF).

Source: Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India (2023)

A 2021 study by the World Bank found that social norms interventions can increase tax compliance by an average of 10-20%.

Source: World Bank (2021)

Examples

The Stanford Prison Experiment

This famous psychological study (1971) demonstrated the powerful influence of situational factors and social roles on human behavior, highlighting how easily individuals can conform to expected norms, even if they are harmful.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can psychological interventions be applied to larger-scale social problems?

Yes, but scaling up requires careful consideration of contextual factors, cultural nuances, and the need for robust evaluation methods. Community-based participatory research is crucial for ensuring interventions are culturally appropriate and sustainable.

Topics Covered

PsychologySocial IssuesApplied PsychologySocial PsychologyProblem Solving