Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Conflict, an inherent part of organizational life, is often perceived negatively. However, Mary Parker Follett, a pioneer in the field of management and organizational behavior, offered a radically different perspective. She famously stated, “Conflict is not necessarily bad; it is the appearance of differences – differences of opinions and of interests.” This statement challenges the traditional view of conflict as purely destructive and emphasizes its potential for growth and innovation. Follett’s work, largely developed in the early 20th century, remains remarkably relevant in contemporary organizational settings grappling with diverse perspectives and complex challenges.
Understanding Conflict and Follett’s Perspective
Traditionally, conflict was viewed through a ‘dominance’ lens – one party wins, the other loses. This approach often led to suppression of dissenting opinions and hindered creativity. Follett, however, advocated for an ‘integrative’ approach. She believed that conflict wasn’t about winning or losing, but about discovering the underlying reasons for disagreement and finding solutions that address the needs of all parties involved.
Key Principles of Follett’s Approach
- Differences as Opportunities: Follett saw differences not as obstacles, but as opportunities for learning and improvement. She argued that by understanding the perspectives of others, organizations could arrive at more informed and effective decisions.
- Collaborative Problem-Solving: Her approach emphasized collaborative problem-solving, where individuals work together to identify common ground and develop mutually acceptable solutions. This contrasts sharply with adversarial negotiation tactics.
- The Importance of Integration: Follett believed in ‘integration’ – a process where conflicting ideas are synthesized to create a new, superior solution. This is not simply compromise, but a creative process of combining the best aspects of different viewpoints.
- Constructive Conflict: She distinguished between destructive and constructive conflict. Destructive conflict arises from ego clashes and a desire to dominate, while constructive conflict stems from a genuine desire to find the best solution.
Illustrative Examples
Consider a scenario in a government department where two sections disagree on the allocation of budget resources. A traditional approach might involve a power struggle, with the higher authority dictating the allocation. Follett’s approach would involve bringing representatives from both sections together to understand their respective needs and priorities. Through collaborative discussion, they might identify a solution that optimizes resource allocation for the benefit of the entire department.
Another example can be seen in the negotiation of international trade agreements. Rather than viewing negotiations as a zero-sum game, Follett’s principles suggest focusing on identifying areas of mutual benefit and creating agreements that address the concerns of all participating nations. The success of the WTO, despite its challenges, demonstrates the potential of integrative approaches in international relations.
Follett’s Relevance in Modern Public Administration
Follett’s ideas are particularly relevant in the context of modern public administration, which increasingly emphasizes participatory governance and stakeholder engagement. Her emphasis on collaboration and integration aligns with the principles of New Public Management and the growing recognition of the importance of citizen participation in policy-making. Furthermore, in a diverse and complex society, the ability to manage conflict constructively is essential for effective governance.
| Traditional Conflict Resolution | Follett’s Integrative Approach |
|---|---|
| Win-Lose mentality | Win-Win mentality |
| Adversarial negotiation | Collaborative problem-solving |
| Suppression of dissent | Encouragement of diverse perspectives |
| Focus on power and control | Focus on integration and mutual understanding |
Conclusion
Mary Parker Follett’s assertion that conflict is the appearance of differences highlights its inherent potential for positive change. By embracing an integrative approach, organizations and governments can transform conflict from a destructive force into a catalyst for innovation, learning, and improved decision-making. Her work remains a valuable resource for anyone seeking to navigate the complexities of organizational life and foster a more collaborative and productive environment. Adopting her principles requires a shift in mindset, moving away from a focus on dominance and towards a commitment to mutual understanding and integration.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.