UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-II201810 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q5.

Elaborate on the phenomenon of 'missing middle' in Indian manufacturing sector.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the structural issues plaguing Indian manufacturing. The answer should define the 'missing middle', explain its causes and consequences, and suggest potential solutions. Structure the answer by first defining the concept, then detailing the factors contributing to it (demand-side, supply-side, and policy-related), followed by its impact on the economy. Finally, discuss potential policy interventions. Focus on data and reports to support your arguments.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Indian manufacturing sector is often characterized by a dualism – a flourishing informal sector and a relatively small number of large, modern enterprises, but a significant dearth of medium-sized firms. This phenomenon is termed the ‘missing middle’. This structural gap hinders the sector’s potential for job creation, innovation, and export growth. Recent reports from the Economic Survey (2019-20) and the RBI have highlighted the continued prevalence of this issue, emphasizing the need for targeted policy interventions to foster the growth of medium-sized manufacturing enterprises.

Understanding the ‘Missing Middle’

The ‘missing middle’ refers to the relative scarcity of medium-sized manufacturing firms in India, particularly those employing between 50-500 workers. While India has a large number of micro and small enterprises (MSMEs) and a few large corporations, the intermediate size class is significantly underrepresented compared to other manufacturing economies like China, Germany, and South Korea.

Causes of the ‘Missing Middle’

Demand-Side Constraints

  • Limited Domestic Demand: Insufficient purchasing power and fragmented domestic markets restrict the scale of operations for medium-sized firms.
  • Lack of Access to Global Value Chains (GVCs): Indian firms often struggle to integrate into GVCs due to quality standards, technological limitations, and logistical challenges.

Supply-Side Constraints

  • Access to Finance: Medium-sized firms face difficulties in securing adequate and affordable financing from banks and financial institutions. They are often considered riskier than large firms but are too large for microfinance schemes.
  • Infrastructure Deficiencies: Inadequate infrastructure – including power, transportation, and logistics – increases production costs and hinders competitiveness.
  • Technological Gaps: Limited access to advanced technologies and R&D capabilities restricts innovation and productivity growth.
  • Skilled Labor Shortage: A lack of skilled labor, particularly in specialized manufacturing areas, constrains the ability of firms to upgrade and expand.

Policy and Regulatory Constraints

  • Complex Regulatory Environment: Cumbersome regulations, bureaucratic delays, and multiple clearances increase the cost of doing business.
  • Labor Laws: Rigid labor laws can discourage firms from scaling up employment and investment.
  • Land Acquisition Issues: Difficulties in acquiring land for expansion can hinder growth.
  • Taxation: Complex tax structures and high tax burdens can reduce profitability.

Impact of the ‘Missing Middle’

  • Reduced Employment Generation: The absence of a robust middle layer limits the potential for job creation, particularly skilled jobs.
  • Lower Productivity Growth: Medium-sized firms are often crucial for technology diffusion and productivity improvements. Their scarcity hinders overall productivity growth.
  • Limited Export Diversification: A weak middle layer restricts the ability of Indian manufacturing to diversify its export basket and move up the value chain.
  • Hindered Innovation: Medium-sized firms are often more agile and innovative than large corporations, but their limited presence stifles innovation in the sector.

Addressing the ‘Missing Middle’ – Policy Interventions

  • Financial Sector Reforms: Improving access to finance for medium-sized firms through credit guarantee schemes, venture capital funds, and streamlined lending procedures.
  • Infrastructure Development: Investing in infrastructure projects – including roads, ports, and power plants – to reduce logistics costs and improve connectivity.
  • Skill Development Programs: Expanding skill development programs to address the shortage of skilled labor in manufacturing.
  • Regulatory Simplification: Streamlining regulations, reducing bureaucratic delays, and promoting ease of doing business.
  • Technology Upgradation Support: Providing financial and technical assistance to firms to adopt new technologies and improve their R&D capabilities.
  • Promoting Cluster Development: Encouraging the development of manufacturing clusters to foster collaboration, knowledge sharing, and economies of scale.

Conclusion

The ‘missing middle’ represents a significant structural bottleneck in the Indian manufacturing sector. Addressing this issue requires a comprehensive and coordinated policy approach that tackles both demand-side and supply-side constraints. By fostering the growth of medium-sized firms, India can unlock its manufacturing potential, create jobs, boost exports, and achieve sustainable economic growth. A focus on ease of doing business, access to finance, and skill development is crucial for bridging this gap and realizing the ‘Make in India’ vision.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Global Value Chains (GVCs)
GVCs refer to the full range of activities that firms undertake to bring a product from its conception to its end use. This includes design, production, marketing, distribution, and support to the final consumer.
Ease of Doing Business
Ease of Doing Business refers to the regulatory environment and administrative efficiency that affects the operations of businesses in a country. A higher ranking indicates a more favorable environment for business activity.

Key Statistics

As of 2018, medium-sized enterprises (50-500 employees) accounted for only 2.1% of all manufacturing enterprises in India, compared to 51.5% for micro enterprises (less than 50 employees).

Source: Annual Survey of Industries, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (knowledge cutoff 2024)

India’s rank in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business index improved from 142 in 2014 to 63 in 2019, but has faced setbacks in recent years.

Source: World Bank (knowledge cutoff 2024)

Examples

Automotive Component Industry

The Indian automotive component industry exemplifies the missing middle. While large players cater to major automobile manufacturers, and a vast number of small-scale units supply basic parts, there's a gap in the mid-tier firms capable of providing complex, high-precision components.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are medium-sized firms considered important for economic development?

Medium-sized firms are often more dynamic and innovative than large corporations, and they provide a crucial link between micro enterprises and large firms, fostering technology diffusion and creating employment opportunities.

Topics Covered

EconomyIndustryManufacturingSMEsIndustrial Policy