Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The provided sentence, "Ram acted with my proposal," is grammatically flawed and lacks clarity. The preposition "with" is incorrectly used in this context. The sentence intends to convey Ram's response to a proposal. Correct English usage requires a verb that accurately reflects the action taken *regarding* the proposal – whether it was acceptance, rejection, agreement, or disagreement. This necessitates a restructuring of the sentence to ensure grammatical correctness and semantic coherence. The following answer will analyze the error and provide several corrected versions, explaining the nuances of each.
Identifying the Grammatical Error
The primary error lies in the misuse of the preposition "with." "Acted with" generally implies acting in collaboration or alongside someone or something. In the context of a proposal, it doesn't convey a clear response. The sentence needs a verb that indicates Ram's reaction to the proposal itself.
Corrected Versions and Explanations
Here are several ways to correctly rewrite the sentence, each with a slightly different nuance:
1. Ram acted *on* my proposal.
This is the most common and generally preferred correction. "Acted on" means to take action as a result of something, in this case, the proposal. It suggests Ram took steps based on the proposal, potentially implementing it or taking it into consideration.
2. Ram acted *upon* my proposal.
This is a more formal version of "acted on." "Upon" is often used in more formal writing and carries the same meaning – Ram took action as a result of the proposal.
3. Ram responded to my proposal.
This is a more direct and neutral way of stating that Ram gave a reaction to the proposal. It doesn't specify the nature of the response (acceptance or rejection) but simply acknowledges that a response occurred.
4. Ram agreed to my proposal.
This version specifies a positive response. It indicates that Ram accepted the terms of the proposal.
5. Ram rejected my proposal.
This version specifies a negative response. It indicates that Ram did not accept the terms of the proposal.
6. Ram considered my proposal.
This suggests Ram gave thought to the proposal, but doesn't necessarily imply acceptance or rejection. It indicates a process of evaluation.
Illustrative Table of Corrections
| Incorrect Sentence | Corrected Sentence | Nuance/Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ram acted with my proposal. | Ram acted on my proposal. | Ram took action based on the proposal. |
| Ram acted with my proposal. | Ram responded to my proposal. | Ram gave a reaction to the proposal. |
| Ram acted with my proposal. | Ram agreed to my proposal. | Ram accepted the proposal. |
The choice of the best correction depends on the specific context and the intended meaning. However, "Ram acted on my proposal" is the most versatile and generally appropriate correction.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the original sentence "Ram acted with my proposal" is grammatically incorrect due to the misuse of the preposition "with." Several corrections are possible, each conveying a slightly different nuance regarding Ram's response to the proposal. Understanding the correct usage of prepositions and verb conjugation is crucial for clear and effective communication in English. The most suitable correction, "Ram acted on my proposal," provides a general and accurate representation of Ram taking action based on the submitted proposal.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.