Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The assertion that “Nothing is politically right which is morally wrong,” championed by Daniel O'Connell and embraced by Mahatma Gandhi, posits a fundamental link between ethical conduct and legitimate political action. This principle, rooted in the belief that means are as important as ends, profoundly influenced the Indian nationalist movement. Raja Rao’s *Kanthapura* (1938), a seminal work of Indian English literature, is often read as a narrative deeply embedded in the Gandhian ethos. This essay will explore the extent to which *Kanthapura* can be understood through the lens of O’Connell and Gandhi’s statement, examining how the novel portrays the interplay between moral conviction and political participation within a rural Indian context.
The Moral Foundation of Kanthapura’s Politics
Raja Rao’s *Kanthapura* is not merely a chronicle of a village’s involvement in the Indian freedom struggle; it’s a study of how moral values shape political consciousness. The novel’s narrative voice, Achakka, embodies a traditional, deeply moral worldview. Her storytelling is infused with a sense of dharma and a belief in the inherent goodness of the village community. This moral framework provides the initial impetus for the village’s engagement with the nationalist movement.
Gandhi and the Moralization of Politics
Gandhi’s influence is pervasive throughout *Kanthapura*. The novel depicts the villagers’ adoption of Gandhian principles like non-violence (ahimsa), self-reliance (swadeshi), and the rejection of untouchability. These principles aren’t simply political strategies; they are presented as moral imperatives. For instance, the villagers’ participation in the boycott of foreign cloth is framed not just as an economic protest but as a moral purification, a rejection of exploitation and injustice.
The Erosion of Morality and the Consequences
However, *Kanthapura* doesn’t present a simplistic picture of moral purity. The novel also explores how political engagement can lead to the erosion of moral values. The arrival of the Congress workers, while initially inspiring, also introduces elements of ambition, self-interest, and even violence. Characters like Rangamma and Bhatta, while initially motivated by patriotic fervor, become increasingly entangled in the power dynamics of the movement, compromising their moral principles.
The Role of Individual Conscience
The novel highlights the importance of individual conscience in navigating the complexities of political action. Characters like Moorthy, initially a symbol of selfless dedication, struggle with the demands of the movement and the compromises it requires. His eventual retreat into asceticism can be interpreted as a rejection of the moral ambiguities inherent in political life. Similarly, the plight of the lower-caste characters, particularly the Pariahs, reveals the limitations of the nationalist movement in addressing deeply ingrained social injustices.
The Violence and its Moral Implications
The climax of the novel, marked by the police firing and the subsequent violence, serves as a stark illustration of the consequences of moral compromise. The villagers’ retaliatory actions, while understandable in the context of their suffering, are presented as a descent into barbarity. This violence underscores the dangers of allowing political passions to override moral considerations. The destruction of Kanthapura itself symbolizes the tragic outcome of a movement that has lost its moral compass.
Table: Moral Dimensions of Key Characters
| Character | Initial Moral Stance | Evolution/Compromise | Moral Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Achakka | Strongly rooted in traditional dharma | Remains steadfast in her moral beliefs | Represents enduring moral values |
| Moorthy | Selfless dedication to Gandhian ideals | Struggles with the compromises of political life | Withdraws from politics, seeking spiritual solace |
| Rangamma | Initially motivated by patriotism | Becomes entangled in power dynamics | Demonstrates the corrupting influence of politics |
| Bhatta | Religious fervor and nationalist zeal | Exploits the movement for personal gain | Represents the hypocrisy within the movement |
The Novel as a Cautionary Tale
Ultimately, *Kanthapura* can be read as a cautionary tale about the dangers of allowing political expediency to trump moral principles. While the novel celebrates the villagers’ initial commitment to Gandhian ideals, it also exposes the fragility of those ideals in the face of political realities. The novel suggests that true political progress requires not only a commitment to national liberation but also a relentless pursuit of moral righteousness.
Conclusion
In conclusion, *Kanthapura* offers a compelling and complex exploration of the relationship between morality and politics. While the novel initially portrays the Gandhian movement as a moral awakening, it also reveals the potential for corruption and violence when moral principles are compromised. Raja Rao’s masterpiece powerfully demonstrates that political action devoid of ethical grounding can lead to devastating consequences, thus validating the assertion that “Nothing is politically right which is morally wrong.” The novel serves as a timeless reminder of the importance of upholding moral values in the pursuit of social and political change.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.