Healthcare Scheme: Ethical Dilemma

Rakesh is a responsible district level officer, who enjoys the trust of his higher officials. Knowing his honesty, the government entrusted him with the responsibility of identifying the beneficiaries under a healthcare scheme meant for senior citizens. The criteria to be a beneficiary are the following: (a) 60 years of age or above. (b) Belonging to a reserved community. (c) Family income of less than 1 lakh per annum. (d) Post-treatment prognosis is likely to be high to make a positive difference to the quality of life of the beneficiary. One day, an old couple visited Rakesh's office with their application. They have been the residents of a village in his district since their birth. The old man is diagnosed with a rare condition that causes obstruction in the large intestine. As a consequence, he has severe abdominal pain frequently that prevents him from doing any physical labour. The couple have no children to support them. The expert surgeon whom they contacted is willing to do the surgery without charging any fee. However, the couple will have to bear the cost of incidental charges, such as medicines, hospitalization, etc., to the tune of 1 lakh. The couple fulfills all the criteria except criterion 'b'. However, any financial aid would certainly make a significant difference in their quality of life. How should Rakesh respond to the situation? (250 words)

How to Approach

This question tests ethical reasoning, particularly the conflict between strict adherence to rules and compassionate consideration of individual circumstances. The approach should involve identifying the ethical dilemmas, applying relevant ethical principles (like utilitarianism, justice, and compassion), and proposing a justified course of action. The answer should demonstrate understanding of the role of a public servant and the importance of balancing bureaucratic procedures with human needs. Structure: Introduction, Dilemma Analysis, Proposed Action & Justification, Conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Public service demands integrity, objectivity, and adherence to rules. However, rigid application of rules without considering the nuances of individual cases can lead to injustice and undermine the very purpose of governance – to serve the citizens. The healthcare scheme for senior citizens, while well-intentioned, presents a classic ethical dilemma when faced with situations that fall into grey areas. This case involving the elderly couple highlights the tension between procedural correctness and compassionate responsiveness, requiring a nuanced and ethically sound response from the district level officer, Rakesh.

Understanding the Ethical Dilemma

Rakesh faces a multi-faceted ethical dilemma. On one hand, he has a duty to uphold the established criteria of the healthcare scheme, as mandated by the government and expected by his superiors. Deviating from these criteria could be seen as favoritism or misuse of power. On the other hand, the couple demonstrably fulfills the spirit of the scheme – they are elderly, financially vulnerable, and the treatment would significantly improve their quality of life. Excluding them solely on the basis of not belonging to a reserved community, despite their genuine need, appears unjust and insensitive.

Applying Ethical Principles

Utilitarianism: Providing aid to the couple would maximize overall happiness and well-being, given the surgeon’s willingness to operate free of charge and the potential for a significant improvement in their quality of life.
Justice: Strictly adhering to the criteria might seem just on the surface, but it could lead to distributive injustice, denying essential aid to those who genuinely need it.
Compassion & Empathy: Rakesh has a moral obligation to show compassion towards the suffering of the elderly couple, especially considering their lack of familial support.
Integrity: Maintaining integrity requires transparency and a justifiable rationale for any deviation from established procedures.

Proposed Course of Action & Justification

Rakesh should proactively engage with his higher authorities to seek a special dispensation for this case. He should present a detailed report outlining the couple’s situation, the surgeon’s offer, and the potential positive impact of the treatment. He should emphasize that while the couple doesn't meet criterion (b), their case represents a genuine hardship and aligns with the scheme’s overall objective of improving the health and well-being of senior citizens.

Specifically, Rakesh should:

Document the entire process meticulously, including the surgeon’s offer and the couple’s financial details.
Prepare a strong justification for seeking an exception, highlighting the unique circumstances of the case.
If a direct exception isn’t possible, explore alternative funding sources, such as discretionary funds available to the district administration or charitable organizations.
If all avenues fail, Rakesh should transparently communicate the outcome to the couple, explaining the constraints he faced and offering assistance in exploring other potential support mechanisms.

This approach demonstrates Rakesh’s commitment to both upholding the rules and exercising compassionate discretion. It also ensures accountability and transparency, mitigating the risk of accusations of impropriety.

Potential Challenges & Mitigation

Rakesh might face resistance from superiors who prioritize strict adherence to rules. To mitigate this, he should frame his request not as a deviation from the rules, but as a responsible exercise of administrative discretion in a deserving case. He should also be prepared to accept the final decision, even if it’s unfavorable, while ensuring that the couple is treated with respect and dignity.

Conclusion

The case of the elderly couple underscores the importance of ethical leadership and the need for public servants to navigate complex situations with empathy and sound judgment. While adherence to rules is crucial, a rigid approach can sometimes be counterproductive. Rakesh’s response should prioritize the well-being of the citizens while upholding the principles of transparency, accountability, and integrity. Ultimately, a proactive and compassionate approach, coupled with a willingness to engage with higher authorities, is the most ethically sound course of action.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Evaluate your handwritten answer in under a minute

Free trial available • Trusted by 1,00,000+ aspirants

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Administrative Discretion

The power or right to decide or act according to one's own judgment. It is a key element of public administration, allowing officials to adapt policies to specific circumstances.

Conflict of Interest

A situation in which a public official's personal interests could compromise their objectivity and impartiality in performing their duties.

Key Statistics

As of 2021, India's population aged 60 years or above was 138 million, representing 10.1% of the total population. This number is projected to increase significantly in the coming decades.

Source: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), India Ageing Report 2021

According to the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) 75th round (2017-18), approximately 23.3% of the elderly population in India reported having no source of income.

Source: National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), 75th Round Report on Elderly in India, 2017-18

Examples

The Right to Education Act (RTE) 2009

The RTE Act mandates free and compulsory education for children aged 6-14 years. However, its implementation often requires administrative discretion to address the unique challenges faced by marginalized communities and children with disabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

▶What if Rakesh's superiors explicitly deny the exception?

If superiors deny the exception, Rakesh should respectfully accept their decision. He should then explore alternative avenues for assistance, such as connecting the couple with NGOs or charitable organizations, and document all efforts made.

Topics Covered

EthicsGovernanceSocial IssuesEthicsHealthcareSocial JusticeCivil Service

Back to all GENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-IV 2018 questions