Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-IV201820 Marks250 Words
Q15.

Road Project & Conflict of Interest

As a senior officer in the Ministry, you have access to important policy decisions and upcoming big announcements such as road construction projects before they are notified in the public domain. The Ministry is about to announce a mega road project for which the drawings are already in place. Sufficient care was taken by the planners to make use of the government land with minimum land acquisition from private parties. Compensation rate for private parties was also finalized as per government rules. Care was also taken to minimize deforestation. Once the project is announced, it is expected that there will be a huge spurt in real estate prices in and around that area. Meanwhile, the Minister concerned insists that you realign the road in such a way that it comes closer to his 20 acres farm house. He also suggests that he would facilitate purchase of a big plot of land in your wife's name at the prevailing rate which is very nominal, in and around the proposed mega road project. He also tries to convince you by saying that there is no harm in it as he is buying the land legally. He even promises to supplement your savings in case you do not have sufficient funds to buy the land. However, by the act of realignment, a lot of agricultural land has to be acquired, thereby causing considerable financial burden on the government, and also displacement of the farmers. As if this is not enough, it will involve cutting down of a large number of trees, denuding the area of its green cover. Faced with this situation, what will you do? Critically examine various conflicts of interest and explain what are your responsibilities as a public servant. (250 words)

How to Approach

This question tests ethical reasoning, conflict of interest resolution, and understanding of a public servant’s responsibilities. A good answer will identify the multiple ethical dilemmas, analyze the conflicts of interest, and outline a course of action prioritizing public duty and integrity. The structure should involve identifying the ethical issues, analyzing the stakeholders involved, outlining the principles at play, detailing the actions to be taken, and justifying those actions. Focus on the principles of objectivity, accountability, and transparency.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Public service demands unwavering integrity and a commitment to the public good. The core of ethical governance lies in navigating complex situations where personal interests may clash with official duties. The case presented exemplifies a classic conflict of interest scenario, where a senior officer is pressured to compromise public interest for the personal gain of a political superior and potential personal benefit. This situation necessitates a careful examination of ethical principles, legal obligations, and the responsibilities inherent in holding a position of trust. The principles of ‘public trust’ and ‘accountability’ are central to resolving such dilemmas.

Identifying the Ethical Issues

The scenario presents several critical ethical issues:

  • Conflict of Interest: The Minister’s request directly benefits him financially through increased property value and a potential land purchase facilitated by the officer’s actions.
  • Abuse of Power: The Minister is leveraging his position to influence a policy decision for personal gain.
  • Compromised Objectivity: The proposed realignment of the road project is not based on sound planning principles but on the Minister’s personal interests.
  • Potential Corruption: The offer of a land purchase and financial assistance constitutes a bribe, even if presented as a ‘facilitation’.
  • Violation of Public Trust: The officer’s access to confidential information is being exploited for private benefit.

Stakeholder Analysis

The key stakeholders and their interests are:

  • The Officer: Faces a moral dilemma between loyalty to the Minister and upholding ethical standards.
  • The Minister: Seeks personal financial gain.
  • The Government: Has a duty to ensure public funds are used efficiently and for the public good.
  • Farmers: Risk displacement and financial hardship due to increased land acquisition.
  • Environment: Faces the negative consequences of deforestation.
  • Public: Entitled to a transparent and equitable infrastructure development process.

Relevant Principles & Legal Framework

Several principles and legal provisions are relevant:

  • Integrity: Maintaining honesty and strong moral principles.
  • Objectivity: Making decisions based on facts and evidence, not personal bias.
  • Accountability: Being responsible for one’s actions and decisions.
  • Transparency: Ensuring openness and clarity in decision-making.
  • Rule of Law: Adhering to established laws and regulations.
  • The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: Addresses bribery and corrupt practices.
  • Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964: Outlines expected standards of conduct for civil servants, including avoiding conflicts of interest.

Course of Action

As a senior officer, I would take the following steps:

  1. Document Everything: Maintain a detailed record of all interactions with the Minister, including dates, times, and specific requests.
  2. Politely but Firmly Refuse: Clearly communicate to the Minister that I cannot comply with his request to realign the road. Explain that such an action would be unethical, detrimental to the public interest, and potentially illegal.
  3. Highlight the Negative Consequences: Explain the increased financial burden on the government, the displacement of farmers, and the environmental damage that would result from the realignment.
  4. Report the Matter: Report the incident to higher authorities within the Ministry (e.g., the Secretary or the Cabinet Secretary) and potentially to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC).
  5. Seek Legal Counsel: Consult with legal experts to understand my rights and obligations.
  6. Insist on the Original Plan: Advocate for the implementation of the original road project plan, which minimized land acquisition and environmental impact.

Justification

This course of action is justified by my duty to uphold the Constitution, the law, and the principles of ethical governance. Prioritizing the public interest over personal or political considerations is paramount. Reporting the matter ensures transparency and accountability, and protects the integrity of the government. While refusing the Minister’s request may have professional repercussions, it is the only ethical course of action.

The offer of land and financial assistance is a clear attempt to induce me into a corrupt practice. Accepting such an offer would not only be illegal but would also compromise my integrity and erode public trust in the government.

Conclusion

This scenario underscores the critical importance of ethical leadership and the courage to resist undue influence. A public servant’s primary allegiance must always be to the Constitution and the public good. While navigating such situations can be challenging, upholding integrity and transparency is essential for maintaining a robust and accountable governance system. Proactive reporting and adherence to established rules are vital safeguards against corruption and abuse of power.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Evaluate your handwritten answer in under a minute

Free trial available • Trusted by 1,00,000+ aspirants

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Conflict of Interest
A situation in which a person's personal interests (financial, familial, etc.) could compromise their objectivity or impartiality in fulfilling their official duties.
Public Trust Doctrine
The principle that certain natural and cultural resources are held in trust by the government for the benefit of the public, and that the government has a duty to protect these resources for future generations.

Key Statistics

According to Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index 2023, India ranked 93 out of 180 countries, indicating a significant level of perceived corruption.

Source: Transparency International (2023)

The estimated loss due to corruption in infrastructure projects in India is around 5-10% of the project cost (Source: Estimates based on various studies by the Indian Institute of Public Administration, knowledge cutoff 2023).

Source: Indian Institute of Public Administration (estimates)

Examples

2G Spectrum Allocation Scam

The 2G spectrum allocation scam (2010) involved the alleged fraudulent allocation of 2G spectrum licenses to telecom operators, resulting in substantial losses to the exchequer. It highlighted the dangers of corruption and cronyism in public procurement.

Frequently Asked Questions

▶What if reporting the incident leads to professional setbacks?

While professional repercussions are a valid concern, ethical conduct should take precedence. Strong ethical principles and a commitment to public service are more valuable than personal advancement gained through compromising integrity. Furthermore, whistle-blower protection mechanisms exist to safeguard individuals who report corruption.

Topics Covered

EthicsGovernanceCorruptionEthicsConflict of InterestCorruptionCivil Service
Back to all GENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-IV 2018 questions