Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526) marked a significant period in Indian history, not only for its political and social changes but also for its distinct architectural contributions. While early Sultanate architecture largely relied on the reuse of materials from pre-existing Hindu and Jain structures, successive rulers gradually introduced new architectural features, particularly in the construction of tombs. These features reflected a synthesis of indigenous Indian craftsmanship with influences from Persia, Central Asia, and the Arab world. This evolution in tomb architecture provides a tangible record of the changing aesthetic sensibilities and technological advancements during the Sultanate period.
Early Phase: Slave Dynasty (1206-1290)
The Slave Dynasty laid the foundation for Indo-Islamic architecture. Tombs during this period were relatively simple, characterized by a focus on functionality rather than elaborate ornamentation. Qutb-ud-din Aibak’s tomb, though incomplete, demonstrates the use of red sandstone and the pointed arch, a hallmark of Islamic architecture. Iltutmish’s tomb, built in 1235, shows a more refined approach with intricate carvings and the introduction of arabesque patterns, though still largely reliant on Hindu architectural elements like corbelled domes.
The Khalji Revolution (1290-1320)
The Khalji dynasty, under Alauddin Khalji, brought about a shift towards more grandiose structures. While fewer tombs were constructed during this period, the Alauddin’s tomb complex, though ruined, suggests a move towards larger dimensions and the use of more durable materials. The introduction of true domes, though still rudimentary, began to appear. The emphasis shifted towards creating a more imposing and symmetrical appearance.
Tughlaq Innovations (1320-1414)
The Tughlaq period witnessed significant experimentation in architectural styles. Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq’s tomb, built in 1325, is a prime example. It introduced several new features:
- Sloping Walls (Battered Walls): A distinctive feature, providing structural stability and a unique aesthetic.
- Grey Sandstone: A departure from the red sandstone used previously.
- Citadel-like Appearance: The tomb was designed to resemble a fortress, reflecting the Tughlaq’s military focus.
- Double Dome: The use of a double dome, providing greater height and a more impressive silhouette.
Muhammad bin Tughlaq continued this trend, though his architectural projects were often abandoned mid-way. His tomb, though simpler, further refined the use of sloping walls and grey sandstone.
The Sayyid Dynasty (1414-1451)
The Sayyid dynasty saw a return to more ornate decoration and a greater emphasis on gardens. Muhammad Shah’s tomb (1444) is a notable example. It features:
- Octagonal Shape: A departure from the square or rectangular plans of earlier tombs.
- Intricate Inlay Work: The use of colored stones and marble to create decorative patterns.
- Gardens (Charbagh): The incorporation of a four-quadrant garden, a Persian concept, around the tomb.
The Sayyid tombs also demonstrate a revival of the use of domes, albeit still relatively small in scale.
Lodi Period: Synthesis and Refinement (1451-1526)
The Lodi dynasty represents the culmination of the architectural developments of the previous centuries. Sikandar Lodi’s tomb (1517) is a prime example of this synthesis. It features:
- Battered Walls & Double Dome: Continuing the Tughlaq tradition.
- Octagonal Plan: Influenced by the Sayyid style.
- Use of Marble: Increasing use of marble alongside sandstone, indicating growing prosperity.
- Elaborate Decoration: Intricate carvings, calligraphy, and inlay work.
The Lodi Garden tombs, including the tomb of Bada Gumbad and Sheesh Gumbad, showcase a refined aesthetic and a mastery of architectural techniques. The use of chhatris (elevated, dome-shaped pavilions) became increasingly common, adding a distinctly Indian element to the architecture.
| Dynasty | Key Architectural Features | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Slave | Pointed arches, reuse of materials, corbelled domes, simple ornamentation | Qutb-ud-din Aibak’s Tomb, Iltutmish’s Tomb |
| Khalji | Larger dimensions, rudimentary true domes | Alauddin Khalji’s Tomb Complex |
| Tughlaq | Sloping walls, grey sandstone, citadel-like appearance, double dome | Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq’s Tomb, Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s Tomb |
| Sayyid | Octagonal shape, intricate inlay work, Charbagh gardens | Muhammad Shah’s Tomb |
| Lodi | Synthesis of previous styles, increased use of marble, elaborate decoration, chhatris | Sikandar Lodi’s Tomb, Bada Gumbad, Sheesh Gumbad |
Conclusion
The evolution of tomb architecture during the Delhi Sultanate reflects a fascinating interplay of indigenous Indian traditions and foreign influences. Each dynasty contributed unique features, gradually refining the architectural style and creating a distinct Indo-Islamic aesthetic. From the simple structures of the Slave dynasty to the ornate tombs of the Lodis, the architectural legacy of the Sultanate period continues to inspire and captivate, serving as a testament to the artistic and technological achievements of the era. The synthesis of styles ultimately laid the groundwork for the magnificent Mughal architecture that followed.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.