UPSC MainsHISTORY-PAPER-II201820 Marks
Q8.

Critically examine the turns and twists in the politics of partition in 1930's and 1940's.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the political developments leading to the Partition of India. The answer should trace the evolution of the idea of Pakistan, the role of key political actors (Congress, Muslim League, British Government), and the impact of events like the Second World War and Cabinet Mission Plan. A chronological structure, highlighting the shifts in positions and strategies, is recommended. Focus should be on critically examining the reasons behind these turns and twists, avoiding a purely descriptive account.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Partition of India in 1947 remains one of the most traumatic events in modern history, resulting in widespread violence and displacement. However, the seeds of Partition were sown much earlier, in the 1930s and 1940s, amidst growing communal tensions and evolving political ambitions. The period witnessed a complex interplay of factors – the rise of Muslim separatism, the failure of constitutional negotiations, and the impact of British colonial policies. This answer will critically examine the key turns and twists in the politics of partition during these decades, analyzing the motivations and actions of the principal stakeholders.

The Genesis of the Demand for Pakistan (1930s)

The initial articulation of the idea of a separate Muslim state can be traced back to the 1930s. While earlier, figures like Syed Ahmad Khan advocated for Muslim interests within a united India, the growing anxieties among Muslims regarding their political and economic future, coupled with perceived Hindu dominance within the Indian National Congress, fueled separatist sentiments.

  • The Allahabad Address (1930): Sir Muhammad Iqbal, in his presidential address to the Muslim League, proposed the creation of a separate Muslim state in northwestern India. This is often considered the first formal articulation of the ‘Pakistan’ idea.
  • The Two-Nation Theory: The concept that Hindus and Muslims constituted two distinct nations with irreconcilable differences gained traction. This theory, though not fully developed initially, became a cornerstone of the Muslim League’s political ideology.
  • The 1937 Elections: The Congress’s victory in the 1937 provincial elections and its subsequent formation of governments in several provinces, while aiming for inclusive governance, were perceived by the Muslim League as a demonstration of Hindu dominance and a threat to Muslim interests. This led to increased support for the League and its separatist agenda.

The War Years and Shifting Positions (1939-1945)

The outbreak of the Second World War significantly altered the political landscape of India. The British government’s unilateral declaration of India’s entry into the war without consulting Indian leaders led to widespread resentment. The Muslim League, initially hesitant, saw an opportunity to bargain for concessions.

  • The Muslim League’s Support for the War Effort: In return for British support for its demands, the Muslim League offered conditional support to the British war effort. This contrasted with the Congress’s initial opposition and subsequent ‘Quit India’ movement.
  • The August Offer (1940): The British government, seeking Indian cooperation during the war, made the August Offer, which proposed a representative form of government after the war, but did not address the issue of Pakistan.
  • The Lahore Resolution (1940): The Muslim League formally adopted the Lahore Resolution, demanding independent states for Muslims in the regions where they were in a majority. This resolution solidified the demand for Pakistan as the League’s primary goal.
  • The Cripps Mission (1942): Sir Stafford Cripps’s mission to India aimed to secure Indian support for the war effort. However, it failed to reach an agreement due to disagreements over the extent of Indian self-governance and the League’s insistence on Pakistan.

The Cabinet Mission Plan and its Failure (1946)

The end of the Second World War brought renewed pressure for Indian independence. The British government sent the Cabinet Mission to India in 1946 to negotiate a transfer of power. The Mission proposed a complex plan for a united India with a three-tier federal structure.

  • The Cabinet Mission Plan (1946): The plan proposed grouping provinces with Muslim majorities into a separate constitutional unit, with provisions for eventual secession after ten years. This was an attempt to accommodate the Muslim League’s concerns while preserving a united India.
  • Initial Acceptance and Subsequent Rejection: Both the Congress and the Muslim League initially accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan. However, disagreements over the interpretation of the grouping provisions and the method of representation led to its eventual breakdown.
  • Jinnah’s ‘Direct Action Day’ (1946): Frustrated with the failure of the Cabinet Mission Plan, Muhammad Ali Jinnah called for ‘Direct Action Day’ on August 16, 1946, which triggered widespread communal violence, particularly in Calcutta.

The Mountbatten Plan and Partition (1947)

The escalating communal violence and the British government’s growing realization that a united India was no longer feasible led to the appointment of Lord Mountbatten as the last Viceroy of India. Mountbatten devised a plan for the partition of India.

  • The Mountbatten Plan (June 3, 1947): The plan proposed the partition of India into India and Pakistan, with the provinces of Punjab and Bengal being divided along religious lines.
  • The Indian Independence Act (1947): The British Parliament passed the Indian Independence Act, which formally granted independence to India and Pakistan.
  • Radcliffe Line: The boundary between India and Pakistan was demarcated by the Radcliffe Commission, a process that was rushed and resulted in arbitrary divisions and further communal tensions.

Conclusion

The politics of partition in the 1930s and 1940s were characterized by a series of complex turns and twists, driven by communal anxieties, political ambitions, and the strategic calculations of key actors. The failure of constitutional negotiations, the impact of the Second World War, and the escalating communal violence ultimately led to the tragic partition of India. While the demand for Pakistan initially emerged as a means to safeguard Muslim interests, it evolved into a full-fledged separatist movement, culminating in the creation of two independent nations. The legacy of Partition continues to shape the political and social landscape of the Indian subcontinent.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Communalism
Communalism refers to a political ideology that emphasizes the interests of a particular religious community, often at the expense of others, and uses religion as a basis for political mobilization.
Direct Action Day
Direct Action Day was a day of hartal (strike) and demonstrations called by the Muslim League on August 16, 1946, to demand the creation of Pakistan. It resulted in widespread communal violence, particularly in Calcutta, and marked a turning point in the movement towards Partition.

Key Statistics

Approximately 10-12 million people were displaced during the Partition of India, making it one of the largest mass migrations in human history.

Source: Gilmartin, David. *Empire and Islam: Punjab and the Making of Partition*. University of California Press, 1994.

Estimates of the death toll during the Partition violence range from 500,000 to 2 million.

Source: Talbot, Ian, and Gurharpal Singh. *The Partition of India*. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Examples

Mappila Rebellion (1921-22)

The Mappila Rebellion in Kerala, sparked by tensions between Muslim tenants and Hindu landlords, demonstrated the potential for communal violence and contributed to the growing anxieties among both communities. It was often cited by proponents of the two-nation theory as evidence of inherent communal divisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was Partition inevitable?

While Partition was not predetermined, the escalating communal tensions, the failure of political negotiations, and the British government’s policies created a situation where it became increasingly difficult to avoid. Historians debate the extent to which Partition could have been prevented, but it is clear that a combination of factors contributed to its occurrence.

Topics Covered

HistoryPolityIndian Independence MovementCommunalismPartition