UPSC MainsPHILOSOPHY-PAPER-I201810 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q19.

Is Puruşa one or many? Explain the Sankhya position in this regard and give arguments in support of your answer.

How to Approach

This question requires a focused understanding of the Sankhya school of Indian philosophy. The approach should involve defining Purusha, outlining the Sankhya metaphysics, and then specifically addressing whether Sankhya posits one or many Purushas. Arguments should be drawn directly from Sankhya texts and commentaries. Structure the answer by first defining key terms, then explaining the Sankhya view of reality, and finally, detailing the debate surrounding the number of Purushas, concluding with a reasoned stance.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Sankhya school, one of the oldest philosophical systems in India, offers a dualistic worldview, fundamentally distinguishing between Purusha (consciousness) and Prakriti (matter). This separation is crucial to understanding its metaphysics and epistemology. The question of whether Purusha is one or many is central to interpreting Sankhya, with differing viewpoints existing within the tradition. While a superficial reading might suggest multiplicity due to the apparent independence of individual experiences, a deeper analysis reveals a nuanced position that leans towards a fundamental unity, albeit with differentiated manifestations. This answer will explore the Sankhya position on the number of Purushas, providing arguments in support of the prevalent interpretation.

Understanding Purusha and Prakriti in Sankhya

At the core of Sankhya philosophy lies the distinction between Purusha, the pure consciousness, and Prakriti, the primordial matter responsible for the creation of the universe. Purusha is characterized by attributes like consciousness, bliss, and inactivity (akarta). It is a passive witness, unaffected by the changes occurring in Prakriti. Prakriti, on the other hand, is dynamic and constantly evolving through its three gunas – Sattva (goodness, purity), Rajas (passion, activity), and Tamas (inertia, darkness). The interaction between Purusha and Prakriti leads to the illusion of experience.

The Debate: One or Many Purushas?

The question of whether Purusha is one or many has been a subject of debate among Sankhya scholars. The Sankhya Karika, a foundational text, initially appears to support the idea of multiple Purushas. This is because each individual seems to possess a unique consciousness and experiences the world differently. This leads to the notion of numerous, independent Purushas, each associated with a particular body and mind.

Arguments for Many Purushas

  • Individual Experience: The diversity of subjective experiences suggests the existence of multiple conscious entities. Each individual’s perception, feelings, and thoughts are unique, implying a distinct Purusha behind each.
  • Liberation (Kaivalya): Sankhya posits that liberation (kaivalya) is achieved when Purusha disidentifies itself from Prakriti. If there were only one Purusha, liberation would be a collective event, which doesn’t align with the individualistic nature of suffering and liberation.
  • Textual Interpretation: Certain interpretations of the Sankhya Karika emphasize the plurality of Purushas, highlighting verses that speak of numerous ‘witnesses’ (Purushas).

Arguments for One Purusha

However, a more refined understanding of Sankhya suggests that the apparent multiplicity of Purushas is illusory. The fundamental Purusha is ultimately one, undivided consciousness. The differentiation arises due to the varying degrees of reflection of Prakriti upon it. This is often explained through the analogy of the sun and its reflections in water.

  • Fundamental Homogeneity: All Purushas share the same essential characteristics – consciousness, bliss, and inactivity. The differences observed are due to the varying conditions of Prakriti, not inherent differences in Purusha itself.
  • Reflection Theory (Pratibimba-vada): The Sankhya school employs the reflection theory to explain the apparent multiplicity. Just as the single sun appears as multiple reflections in different bodies of water, the one Purusha appears as many due to its reflection in different instances of Prakriti.
  • Non-Differentiation: The ultimate goal of Sankhya is the realization of the non-differentiation between Purusha and Prakriti. This implies that the perceived separation is an illusion, and the underlying reality is a unified consciousness.

Reconciling the Perspectives

The apparent contradiction can be resolved by understanding that Sankhya doesn’t deny individual experiences but explains them as arising from the unique configurations of Prakriti. The one Purusha remains unchanged, while Prakriti undergoes modifications, creating the illusion of multiple conscious entities. The multiplicity is phenomenal, while the unity is noumenal.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the <em>Sankhya Karika</em> allows for interpretations supporting multiple Purushas based on individual experiences, a deeper analysis reveals a more coherent understanding of a single, fundamental Purusha. The apparent multiplicity arises from the reflection of this one consciousness in the diverse forms of Prakriti. This perspective aligns with the ultimate goal of Sankhya – liberation through the realization of the true nature of reality, which is the non-dualistic unity of Purusha and Prakriti. The debate highlights the complexities within the Sankhya system and the importance of nuanced interpretation.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Prakriti
The primordial matter in Sankhya philosophy, responsible for the creation of the universe and all its manifestations. It is composed of three gunas: Sattva, Rajas, and Tamas.
Gunas
The three fundamental qualities of Prakriti: Sattva (goodness, purity, harmony), Rajas (passion, activity, dynamism), and Tamas (inertia, darkness, heaviness). The interplay of these gunas determines the nature of all phenomena.

Key Statistics

The Sankhya Karika is estimated to have been composed between the 2nd and 5th centuries CE, though its origins are likely older.

Source: Zimmer, Heinrich. *Philosophies of India*. Princeton University Press, 1963.

Approximately 20% of the population in India practices some form of Yoga, which is deeply rooted in Sankhya philosophy.

Source: Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India (Data as of 2022)

Examples

The Mirror and the Reflection

The analogy of a mirror and its reflection is frequently used to illustrate the Sankhya concept of Purusha and Prakriti. The mirror represents Purusha – clear, unchanging, and passive. The reflection represents the individual self (Jiva) – a temporary and changing image created by the interaction with Prakriti.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Sankhya differ from Yoga?

While both Sankhya and Yoga share a common metaphysical foundation, Yoga adds the concept of Ishvara (a personal God) and emphasizes practical techniques (asanas, pranayama, meditation) for achieving liberation, whereas Sankhya is primarily a theoretical system focused on understanding the nature of reality.

Topics Covered

PhilosophyIndian PhilosophySankhyaPurushaOneMany