Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Social movements, collective endeavors aimed at bringing about or resisting social change, are a defining feature of modern societies. The question of whether these movements are ‘primordial in means and progressive in agenda’ probes the core dynamics of collective action. ‘Primordialism’, in this context, refers to the reliance on pre-existing cultural, ethnic, or religious bonds to mobilize support. ‘Progressivism’ signifies an orientation towards societal improvement, often advocating for greater equality, justice, or freedom. While many movements champion progressive goals, their mobilization strategies frequently tap into deeply rooted identities and sentiments, creating a complex interplay between tradition and change.
Understanding Primordialism and Progressivism
Primordialism, as theorized by Clifford Geertz, suggests that social identities are deeply rooted in kinship, ethnicity, and religion – ‘given’ rather than ‘chosen’. Social movements often leverage these ‘given’ identities to foster solidarity and mobilize collective action. Progressivism, conversely, emphasizes rational, goal-oriented action aimed at improving societal conditions. It often involves challenging existing power structures and advocating for reforms based on universal principles.
Primordial Means: The Role of Identity
Many successful social movements have relied heavily on primordial ties for mobilization. Consider:
- The Indian Independence Movement (1857-1947): While advocating for a modern nation-state, the movement initially drew strength from religious and regional identities. Hindu nationalism, for example, played a significant role in mobilizing support, particularly among certain sections of the population.
- The Khalistan Movement (1980s-90s): This movement, seeking a separate Sikh state, was deeply rooted in Sikh religious identity and historical grievances. The mobilization was largely based on shared religious beliefs and a sense of collective victimhood.
- Farmers’ Protests (2020-21): The recent farmers’ protests in India, while addressing economic concerns, were significantly fueled by the strong sense of community and shared agrarian identity (Jat identity in Haryana and Punjab) among farmers.
These examples demonstrate how movements, even with progressive agendas, often utilize pre-existing cultural and emotional bonds to build momentum and garner support. This isn’t necessarily manipulative; it’s often a pragmatic strategy for overcoming collective action problems.
Progressive Agendas: Goals of Social Change
Despite potentially primordial means, the agendas of most social movements are demonstrably progressive. They aim to address perceived injustices and inequalities. Examples include:
- The Civil Rights Movement (USA, 1954-1968): This movement fought for racial equality and an end to segregation, advocating for fundamental rights for African Americans.
- The Women’s Suffrage Movement (late 19th – early 20th century): This global movement campaigned for women’s right to vote, challenging patriarchal norms and advocating for gender equality.
- The Environmental Movement (1970s – present): This movement seeks to protect the environment and promote sustainable development, addressing concerns about climate change and ecological degradation.
These movements, while sometimes employing identity-based mobilization, ultimately strive for broader societal improvements and the realization of universal values.
Complexities and Exceptions
However, the relationship isn’t always straightforward. Some movements can be both primordial in means *and* regressive in agenda. For instance, certain ethno-nationalist movements may mobilize based on shared ethnicity but advocate for exclusionary policies that harm minority groups. Furthermore, the line between ‘primordial’ and ‘modern’ is often blurred. Modern identities are themselves constructed and can be mobilized for political purposes. The rise of online activism and social media has also introduced new forms of mobilization that are less reliant on traditional primordial ties.
| Movement | Primordial Means | Progressive Agenda |
|---|---|---|
| Indian Independence Movement | Religious & Regional Identities | National Self-Determination, Democratic Governance |
| Civil Rights Movement (USA) | Shared Racial Identity & Experiences | Racial Equality, Legal Rights |
| Farmers’ Protests (2020-21) | Agrarian Identity, Community Bonds | Protection of Farmers’ Rights, Fair Prices |
Conclusion
In conclusion, the assertion that social movements are primordial in means and progressive in agenda holds considerable truth. While their mobilization strategies often leverage pre-existing identities and emotional ties, their overarching goals typically aim for societal betterment and the realization of progressive values. However, it’s crucial to acknowledge the complexities and exceptions, recognizing that some movements can be both primordial and regressive. Understanding this dynamic interplay is essential for analyzing the multifaceted nature of social change.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.