UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-II201915 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q7.

Explain the underlying causes and effects of deindustrialisation in India during the 19th century.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of India’s economic history, specifically the decline of its traditional industries during the 19th century under British rule. The answer should focus on both the 'causes' – encompassing colonial policies, technological changes, and global economic shifts – and the 'effects' – detailing the socio-economic consequences for India. A chronological structure, starting with pre-colonial India and progressing through the 19th century, is recommended. Emphasis should be placed on the interplay of factors, avoiding a simplistic blame-game.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Deindustrialisation refers to the decline of industrial activity in a region or country, often accompanied by a shift towards an agrarian economy. Prior to the 19th century, India possessed a thriving handicraft industry, renowned globally for its textiles, iron, and shipbuilding. However, the advent of British colonial rule witnessed a systematic dismantling of this industrial base. This wasn’t a sudden collapse, but a gradual process driven by a complex interplay of factors, transforming India from a significant exporter to an importer of manufactured goods. Understanding this deindustrialisation is crucial to comprehending the long-term economic consequences of colonialism and its impact on India’s development trajectory.

Pre-Colonial Indian Economy: A Foundation of Industry

Before the arrival of the British, India boasted a flourishing industrial sector. Artisan production was organized through a putting-out system, where merchants supplied raw materials to craftsmen and collected the finished goods. This system fostered specialization and high-quality production. Indian textiles, particularly cotton, were highly sought after in Europe, Asia, and Africa. The shipbuilding industry, iron smelting, and other crafts also contributed significantly to the economy. Evidence suggests a relatively high degree of internal trade and a sophisticated financial system.

Causes of Deindustrialisation

1. Colonial Economic Policies

  • Discriminatory Tariffs: British policies imposed high tariffs on Indian manufactured goods entering Britain, while simultaneously allowing duty-free import of British goods into India. This created an uneven playing field, crippling Indian industries.
  • Destruction of Traditional Industries: Industries like textiles faced direct competition from cheaper, machine-made British goods. The traditional weaving industry, for example, suffered immensely.
  • Monopoly Trade: The East India Company established a monopoly over trade, restricting Indian merchants and artisans from participating freely in the market.
  • Land Revenue Policies: High land revenue demands under systems like the Permanent Settlement (1793) forced artisans to abandon their crafts and take up agriculture to meet revenue obligations.

2. Technological Changes & Industrial Revolution in Britain

The Industrial Revolution in Britain led to the development of mechanized production, particularly in textiles. British factories could produce goods at a much lower cost than Indian artisans, making them highly competitive in the Indian market. The introduction of power looms and steam engines revolutionized textile production, surpassing the quality and quantity achievable through traditional methods.

3. Changing Patterns of Trade

The British transformed India into a supplier of raw materials and a market for British manufactured goods. This shift in trade patterns undermined Indian industries. Raw cotton, indigo, opium, and other commodities were exported to Britain, while finished goods were imported back into India. This drain of wealth further weakened the Indian economy.

4. Decline of Indian Merchant Class

The preferential treatment given to British merchants and the restrictions imposed on Indian traders led to the decline of the Indian merchant class. They lost their traditional role as intermediaries between producers and consumers, and their capital was diverted to less productive activities.

Effects of Deindustrialisation

1. Economic Consequences

  • Decline in Export Earnings: India’s share in world trade declined significantly. Exports of textiles, iron, and other manufactured goods plummeted.
  • Increased Poverty and Unemployment: Millions of artisans lost their livelihoods, leading to widespread poverty and unemployment.
  • Agrarian Distress: The influx of cheap manufactured goods from Britain led to a decline in agricultural prices, exacerbating agrarian distress.
  • Drain of Wealth: The outflow of wealth from India to Britain, in the form of profits, salaries, and pensions, further impoverished the country.

2. Social Consequences

  • Disruption of Traditional Social Structures: The decline of artisan communities disrupted traditional social structures and led to social unrest.
  • Rise of Rural Indebtedness: Artisans forced to take up agriculture often fell into debt, leading to landlessness and exploitation.
  • Famines and Scarcity: The economic disruption contributed to frequent famines and scarcity in various parts of India.

3. Long-Term Impact

Deindustrialisation laid the foundation for India’s economic backwardness during the colonial period and continued to have repercussions even after independence. It hindered the development of a strong industrial base and contributed to the country’s dependence on imports. The legacy of deindustrialisation continues to shape India’s economic policies and development challenges today.

Pre-Colonial India Post-Colonial India (19th Century)
Thriving handicraft industries Decline of traditional industries
Exporter of manufactured goods Importer of manufactured goods
Sophisticated financial system Underdeveloped financial system
High degree of internal trade Restricted internal trade

Conclusion

The deindustrialisation of India during the 19th century was a complex process driven by a combination of colonial policies, technological changes, and shifts in global trade patterns. It resulted in widespread economic hardship, social disruption, and long-term economic backwardness. While the Industrial Revolution in Britain played a role, the deliberate policies of the British East India Company were instrumental in dismantling India’s traditional industrial base, transforming it into a supplier of raw materials and a market for British goods. Understanding this historical process is crucial for appreciating the challenges of economic development in post-colonial India.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Putting-out System
A method of production where merchants provide raw materials to artisans who work in their homes, and the merchants then collect and sell the finished products.
Drain of Wealth
The transfer of economic resources from India to Britain without commensurate returns, primarily through profits, salaries, pensions, and interest payments.

Key Statistics

India’s share of world manufacturing output fell from 25% in 1750 to 2% in 1900.

Source: Angus Maddison, Contours of the World Economy, 1–2030 AD (2007)

Between 1815 and 1835, the value of cotton goods imported into India increased from £1 million to £4.4 million, while the value of cotton goods exported from India decreased from £2.7 million to £0.3 million.

Source: Report on the Cotton Trade of India, 1860-61 (Knowledge cutoff: 2021)

Examples

Dacca Muslin

Dacca muslin, a renowned fine cotton textile, was a major export from Bengal. British policies led to its decline, and the industry virtually disappeared by the late 19th century.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was deindustrialisation solely caused by British policies?

While British policies were the primary driver, the Industrial Revolution in Britain and the resulting technological advancements also played a significant role. However, the British actively suppressed Indian industries to create a market for their own goods.

Topics Covered

HistoryEconomyEconomic HistoryBritish IndiaIndustrial Decline