UPSC MainsENGLISH-LITERATURE-PAPER-II201910 Marks150 Words
Q5.

Only the Egyptians had it right : their kings had sisters for queens to continue the incests of childhood into marriage.

How to Approach

This question, taken from a literary text, demands an analytical response focusing on the implications of the presented imagery. The approach should involve interpreting the symbolic weight of incestuous royal marriages in ancient Egypt, moving beyond a literal understanding to explore themes of power, lineage, and societal control. The answer should demonstrate an understanding of historical context and potential literary interpretations, avoiding moral judgements and focusing on the function of the imagery within the poem. A concise, focused response is key, given the word limit.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The provided lines, evocative and unsettling, present a stark view of ancient Egyptian royal practice – the marriage of siblings. This wasn’t merely a personal preference but a deeply ingrained political and religious strategy. Egyptian pharaohs, considered divine rulers, often married their sisters to maintain the purity of the royal bloodline and consolidate power within the family. This practice, while viewed with disapproval in many cultures, was seen as essential for preserving the divine status and legitimacy of the kingship, effectively turning childhood intimacy into a cornerstone of dynastic continuity. The poem’s assertion that “Only the Egyptians had it right” is a provocative statement demanding exploration.

The Political and Religious Context

The practice of sibling marriage in ancient Egypt was rooted in the mythology surrounding Osiris, Isis, and Seth. Osiris and Isis were siblings who married and ruled Egypt, representing ideal kingship. Pharaohs, as living embodiments of Horus (son of Osiris and Isis), sought to emulate this divine model. This wasn’t simply about genetics; it was about reinforcing the pharaoh’s claim to divine authority.

Maintaining Royal Lineage and Power

Egypt’s political landscape was often unstable, with threats from external forces and internal power struggles. Marrying within the family ensured that the throne remained within the royal lineage, preventing challenges from ambitious nobles or foreign claimants. This practice minimized the risk of dilution of the royal bloodline and maintained control over land and resources.

Symbolism and Interpretation

The lines suggest a certain comfort and continuity in this practice, framing it as a natural extension of childhood bonds. This is a deliberately unsettling image. The poem doesn’t necessarily endorse the practice but rather highlights its completeness – the seamless transition from familial affection to a politically motivated union. The “incests of childhood” are not presented as taboo but as a foundational element of the Egyptian social order.

Comparison with Other Ancient Cultures

While not unique to Egypt, sibling marriage was far more prevalent and formally sanctioned there than in many other ancient civilizations. In other cultures, such as the Inca empire, royal intermarriage occurred, but it wasn’t as consistently practiced as in Egypt. The poem’s claim of Egyptian exceptionalism is a literary device to emphasize the unique nature of their societal structure and belief system.

Literary Function of the Statement

The provocative statement "Only the Egyptians had it right" is likely intended to be ironic or to challenge conventional moral perspectives. It forces the reader to confront the cultural relativity of norms and to consider the logic behind practices that might seem abhorrent from a modern viewpoint. The poem uses this historical practice to explore themes of power, control, and the construction of identity.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the lines present a complex and challenging perspective on ancient Egyptian royal marriage. The practice, while ethically questionable by modern standards, was deeply embedded in the political, religious, and symbolic fabric of Egyptian society. The poem’s assertion isn’t a literal endorsement but a provocative statement designed to explore the complexities of power, lineage, and the cultural construction of morality. It invites a re-evaluation of historical practices through a lens that acknowledges their internal logic and function within their specific context.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Dynastic Continuity
The uninterrupted succession of rulers within a single family or lineage, ensuring the stability and preservation of a ruling house.
Theocracy
A system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god. Ancient Egypt, with its pharaohs considered divine, exhibited elements of theocracy.

Key Statistics

Approximately 70% of Egyptian pharaohs between 1550-1070 BC practiced sibling marriage, demonstrating its widespread adoption during the New Kingdom period.

Source: Dodson, A., & Hilton, D. (2004). *The Complete Royal Families of Ancient Egypt*. Thames & Hudson.

Studies suggest that inbreeding depression, resulting from prolonged sibling marriage, may have contributed to the relatively short lifespans and health issues observed among some Egyptian pharaohs (knowledge cutoff 2021).

Source: Hawass, Z. A., et al. (2010). Genomic dissection of Tutankhamun’s ancestry. *Journal of the American Medical Association*, *303*(12), 1219–1222.

Examples

Akhenaten and Nefertiti

Akhenaten, the pharaoh who initiated a religious revolution in Egypt, married his half-sister Nefertiti. Their family, depicted in numerous artistic representations, exemplifies the practice of royal sibling marriage and its importance in maintaining the royal lineage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was sibling marriage common among all levels of Egyptian society?

No, sibling marriage was primarily reserved for the royal family and the elite. While it wasn't strictly forbidden for commoners, it was not a widespread practice and lacked the religious and political significance it held for the pharaohs.