UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-II201915 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q14.

“The Attorney-General is the chief legal adviser and lawyer of the Government of India.” Discuss.

How to Approach

This question requires a detailed understanding of the constitutional role of the Attorney-General for India (AGI). The answer should define the AGI’s position, elaborate on their functions as legal advisor and lawyer, and discuss the extent to which they fulfill this role. It should also touch upon limitations and potential conflicts of interest. A structured approach covering constitutional provisions, functions, limitations, and recent debates will be effective.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Attorney-General for India (AGI) is a crucial component of the Indian legal system, envisioned by the Constitution as the principal legal advisor to the Union Government. Article 76 of the Constitution designates the AGI, who is expected to safeguard the interests of the state and uphold the rule of law. The office has been subject to scrutiny and debate, particularly regarding its independence and effectiveness in balancing its advisory and representational roles. Recent debates surrounding the AGI’s advice in sensitive cases highlight the importance of understanding the scope and limitations of this constitutional office.

Constitutional Basis and Appointment

Article 76 of the Constitution provides for the office of the Attorney-General for India. The AGI is appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister. To be eligible, a person must be a qualified lawyer with at least ten years of experience in the High Court or the Supreme Court. The AGI holds office during the pleasure of the President, meaning they can be removed at any time. The Constitution does not explicitly define the term of office, but convention dictates it aligns with the government’s tenure.

Functions as Chief Legal Advisor

The AGI’s primary function is to advise the Government of India on all legal matters. This includes:

  • Constitutional Matters: Providing opinions on the constitutionality of laws and policies.
  • Legislative Drafting: Assisting in the drafting of legislation to ensure its legal soundness.
  • Treaty Examination: Scrutinizing treaties and agreements before they are ratified.
  • Policy Advice: Offering legal perspectives on government policies and programs.

This advisory role is crucial in preventing legal challenges and ensuring that government actions are within the bounds of the Constitution. For example, the AGI’s opinion is often sought before introducing significant amendments to existing laws.

Functions as Lawyer of the Government

The AGI also acts as the lawyer for the Government of India in all cases before the Supreme Court and other courts. This involves:

  • Representing the Union: Appearing in court on behalf of the Union Government and its various departments.
  • Defending Government Actions: Defending government policies and actions against legal challenges.
  • Supervising Government Litigation: Overseeing the litigation conducted by other government lawyers.

The AGI can delegate work to Additional Solicitors General (ASGs) and other government advocates. The AGI’s representation is vital in protecting the government’s interests and upholding its legal position. The landmark Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) case saw significant involvement of the AGI in defending the constitutional validity of amendments.

Limitations and Potential Conflicts

Despite the broad mandate, the AGI’s role is subject to certain limitations:

  • Part-Time Office: The AGI is not a full-time salaried officer, which can lead to conflicts of interest if they continue to practice law privately.
  • Advisory vs. Binding: The AGI’s advice is not binding on the government, and the government can choose to disregard it.
  • Political Influence: The AGI is appointed by the government and can be influenced by political considerations.
  • Independence Concerns: The AGI’s independence has been questioned, particularly when they are perceived as being overly aligned with the government’s position.

Recent instances where the AGI’s advice has been publicly debated, such as in cases involving electoral bonds or the revocation of Article 370, have raised concerns about the office’s impartiality.

Distinction from Solicitor General

It’s important to distinguish the AGI from the Solicitor General. While the AGI is the principal legal advisor, the Solicitor General is the second-highest law officer and assists the AGI in their duties. The Solicitor General often handles specific cases and provides specialized legal expertise. The number of ASGs can be determined by the government.

Attorney-General for India Solicitor-General for India
Principal legal advisor to the Union Government Assists the AGI in legal matters
Represents the government in the Supreme Court and other courts Represents the government in courts, often handling specific cases
Appointed by the President Appointed by the President

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Attorney-General for India undeniably serves as the chief legal advisor and lawyer of the Government of India, fulfilling a vital constitutional role. However, the office’s effectiveness is tempered by limitations related to its part-time nature, the non-binding nature of its advice, and potential for political influence. Strengthening the AGI’s independence and ensuring greater transparency in its advisory role are crucial for upholding the rule of law and maintaining public trust in the legal system. A debate on converting the office to a full-time salaried position could address some of the existing concerns.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Rule of Law
The principle that all individuals and institutions are subject to and accountable to the law, which is fairly applied and enforced.
Non-Binding Advice
Advice given by the AGI that the government is not legally obligated to follow. The government retains the discretion to accept or reject the AGI’s recommendations.

Key Statistics

As of 2023, the Union Government has engaged over 300 lawyers in various cases, highlighting the extensive legal workload (Source: PRS Legislative Research, based on RTI data).

Source: PRS Legislative Research

The expenditure on legal fees by the Union Government increased by approximately 30% between 2018-19 and 2022-23, indicating a growing reliance on external legal counsel (Source: Comptroller and Auditor General of India reports, knowledge cutoff 2024).

Source: CAG Reports

Examples

Electoral Bonds Case

The AGI’s advice in the Electoral Bonds case, regarding the anonymity of donors, was heavily scrutinized by the opposition and civil society groups, raising questions about the office’s impartiality.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the Attorney-General be held accountable for their advice?

While the AGI is not directly accountable in a legal sense for their advice, their opinions are subject to judicial review if they are incorporated into government actions that are challenged in court. Furthermore, public scrutiny and parliamentary debate can hold them accountable politically.

Topics Covered

PolityLawConstitutional LawJudicial SystemGovernment Functions