Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The Continental Drift Theory, proposed by Alfred Wegener in 1912, postulates that the Earth’s continents were once joined together in a single supercontinent called Pangaea and have gradually drifted apart over millions of years. This revolutionary idea challenged the prevailing belief in a static Earth. While initially met with skepticism due to the lack of a plausible mechanism, accumulating evidence from various disciplines eventually paved the way for the broader theory of Plate Tectonics. Understanding the evidence supporting continental drift is crucial to comprehending the dynamic nature of our planet and the processes shaping its surface.
Evidence Supporting Continental Drift
1. Geological Evidence: ‘Jigsaw Fit’ and Rock Correlation
The most striking initial observation was the apparent ‘jigsaw fit’ of the continents, particularly South America and Africa. Wegener noted the remarkable correspondence in their coastlines. More importantly, detailed geological studies revealed matching rock formations, mountain ranges, and mineral deposits across continents now separated by vast oceans. For example, the Appalachian Mountains in North America have geological similarities with the Caledonian Mountains in Scotland and Norway. The presence of identical Precambrian basement rocks on the eastern coast of South America and the western coast of Africa further supports this correlation.
2. Paleontological Evidence: Fossil Distribution
The distribution of fossilized plants and animals provided compelling evidence. Fossils of the same species were found on widely separated continents, suggesting they were once connected.
- Mesosaurus: This freshwater reptile’s fossils are found only in South America and Africa, indicating these continents were once joined, as it couldn’t have crossed the Atlantic Ocean.
- Glossopteris: Fossils of this seed fern are found in South America, Africa, India, Australia, and Antarctica, suggesting a unified landmass in the Southern Hemisphere.
- Cynognathus & Lystrosaurus: These land-dwelling reptiles are found in South America, Africa, and Antarctica, further supporting the idea of continental connections.
3. Climatological Evidence: Evidence of Past Glaciation
Evidence of past glaciation, such as glacial striations, till deposits, and coal beds, found in regions now located near the equator (like India and Africa) suggests these continents were once situated closer to the poles. The distribution of these glacial deposits is best explained by a supercontinent positioned over the South Pole. Similarly, the presence of coal deposits (formed from tropical vegetation) in Antarctica indicates it once had a warmer climate.
4. Geophysical Evidence: Paleomagnetism and Seafloor Spreading (later supporting evidence)
Paleomagnetic studies, analyzing the magnetic properties of rocks, revealed that continents had different magnetic pole positions at different times. This ‘apparent polar wander’ could be explained if the continents themselves had moved. Later, the discovery of seafloor spreading, though not initially part of Wegener’s theory, provided a mechanism for continental drift. The symmetrical pattern of magnetic anomalies on either side of mid-ocean ridges demonstrated the creation of new oceanic crust and the movement of continents.
Limitations of the Continental Drift Theory
1. Lack of a Plausible Mechanism
The most significant limitation of Wegener’s theory was his inability to explain *how* the continents moved. He proposed that continents ‘plowed’ through the oceanic crust, which was physically impossible given the strength of the oceanic material. He suggested centrifugal force and tidal drag as potential driving forces, but these were deemed insufficient by the scientific community.
2. Incomplete Fit of Continents
While the coastlines showed a good fit, the actual edges of the continental shelves provided a more accurate match. Wegener relied primarily on visible coastlines, which are modified by erosion and sea-level changes. This led to some discrepancies in the fit.
3. Difficulty Explaining Transverse Mountain Ranges
Wegener’s theory struggled to explain the formation of mountain ranges that ran perpendicular to the supposed direction of continental movement. The formation of such features required a more complex mechanism than simple collision.
4. Limited Geophysical Data
In the early 20th century, knowledge of the Earth’s interior and the nature of the oceanic crust was limited. The lack of detailed seismic data hindered the understanding of the processes occurring beneath the surface.
Conclusion
The Continental Drift Theory, despite its initial limitations, laid the foundation for our modern understanding of plate tectonics. The compelling evidence from geology, paleontology, climatology, and later, geophysics, demonstrated that continents were not fixed but have moved over geological time. While Wegener couldn’t provide a satisfactory mechanism, his work spurred further research that ultimately led to the development of the Plate Tectonic Theory, which explains both the movement of continents and the processes driving it. This remains a cornerstone of modern Earth science.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.