UPSC MainsPHILOSOPHY-PAPER-II201910 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q18.

Does a devoted commitment to a religious way of life make man go astray from social morality? Examine.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the relationship between religious devotion and social morality. The approach should be dialectical, acknowledging potential conflicts as well as harmonies. Structure the answer by first defining both 'religious way of life' and 'social morality'. Then, explore arguments for how devotion *can* lead astray (fundamentalism, exclusion, justification of harmful practices), and counter-arguments showing how it can *strengthen* morality (promoting compassion, ethical conduct, social service). Finally, offer a balanced conclusion. Focus on examples and philosophical underpinnings.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The interplay between religious belief and ethical conduct has been a subject of philosophical debate for centuries. A ‘religious way of life’ typically entails adherence to a specific faith’s doctrines, rituals, and moral codes, often prioritizing divine commands. ‘Social morality’, conversely, refers to the norms of behavior considered acceptable within a society, often grounded in principles of reciprocity, fairness, and harm reduction. The question posits a potential tension: can a deep commitment to the former lead to a deviation from the latter? While religious devotion often fosters prosocial behavior, instances of religiously motivated actions contradicting widely accepted social norms necessitate a critical examination of this relationship.

Potential for Deviation

There are several ways in which a devoted commitment to a religious way of life can potentially lead one astray from social morality:

  • Dogmatism and Fundamentalism: Strict adherence to religious dogma can foster intolerance and rejection of differing viewpoints, leading to discrimination and conflict. For example, historical and contemporary instances of religiously motivated persecution of minority groups demonstrate this.
  • Exclusivity and ‘Us vs. Them’ Mentality: Many religions emphasize the uniqueness of their path to salvation, potentially fostering a sense of superiority and alienation from those outside the faith. This can manifest as prejudice and social exclusion.
  • Justification of Harmful Practices: Historically, religious beliefs have been used to justify practices considered morally reprehensible today, such as slavery, sati, and caste-based discrimination. The interpretation of scriptures can be manipulated to rationalize unethical behavior.
  • Prioritization of Divine Law over Secular Law: In some cases, individuals may prioritize religious law over the laws of the state, leading to conflicts with the legal system and undermining social order.

Arguments for Moral Enhancement

However, it is crucial to acknowledge that religious devotion can also *strengthen* social morality:

  • Promotion of Ethical Values: Most religions emphasize core ethical values such as compassion, honesty, and justice. These values can serve as a strong foundation for moral behavior.
  • Social Service and Charity: Religious organizations often play a significant role in providing social services, such as healthcare, education, and disaster relief, contributing to the well-being of society.
  • Community Building and Social Cohesion: Religious institutions can foster a sense of community and belonging, promoting social cohesion and mutual support.
  • Internal Moral Compass: For many believers, faith provides an internal moral compass, guiding their actions and promoting ethical decision-making.

The Role of Interpretation and Context

The relationship between religious devotion and social morality is not deterministic. It is heavily influenced by the *interpretation* of religious texts and the *context* in which those interpretations are applied. Liberal interpretations of religious texts often emphasize universal values and social justice, while conservative interpretations may prioritize strict adherence to traditional norms. Furthermore, the socio-political context can shape how religious beliefs are expressed and practiced.

Philosophical Perspectives

Philosophers have long debated this issue. Immanuel Kant, for example, emphasized the importance of reason and universal moral principles, suggesting that morality should not be based solely on religious faith. However, others, like Alasdair MacIntyre, argue that morality is inextricably linked to tradition, including religious traditions. The tension between these perspectives highlights the complexity of the issue.

Aspect Potential for Deviation Potential for Enhancement
Focus Divine commands, exclusivity Universal ethics, compassion
Outcome Intolerance, discrimination, conflict Social service, community building, ethical conduct
Key Factor Dogmatic interpretation Liberal interpretation & contextual application

Conclusion

In conclusion, a devoted commitment to a religious way of life does not *necessarily* lead one astray from social morality. While the potential for deviation exists, particularly through dogmatism and exclusivity, religion can also be a powerful force for good, promoting ethical values and social responsibility. The crucial factor lies in the interpretation of religious teachings and their application within a specific socio-political context. A balanced approach, emphasizing reason, empathy, and respect for diverse perspectives, is essential to harness the positive potential of religion while mitigating its potential harms.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Dogmatism
The tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, and to refuse to question them.
Social Morality
The standards of behavior that are considered acceptable and ethical within a particular society or culture.

Key Statistics

According to the Pew Research Center (2017), approximately 84% of the world’s population identifies with a religious group.

Source: Pew Research Center, "The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society"

A 2019 study by the World Values Survey found a correlation between religious participation and charitable giving in many countries, though the strength of the correlation varies significantly.

Source: World Values Survey, 2019

Examples

The Indian Caste System

Historically, the Hindu caste system was justified through religious scriptures, leading to widespread social inequality and discrimination. This exemplifies how religious beliefs can be used to legitimize morally objectionable practices.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can secular ethics provide a sufficient moral framework without religion?

Yes, secular ethical frameworks, such as utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, offer alternative bases for moral reasoning and action, independent of religious belief.

Topics Covered

ReligionSociologyEthicsReligionMoralitySocial Norms