Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Robert K. Merton’s Strain Theory, developed in his 1938 paper “Social Structure and Anomie,” provides a sociological explanation for deviance as a product of the discrepancies between culturally defined goals and the socially structured means available to achieve them. Merton argued that when a society emphasizes certain goals (like wealth and success) but doesn’t provide equal access to legitimate means (like education and employment), individuals experience strain. This strain can lead to different adaptive responses, some of which are considered deviant. Understanding these adaptations is crucial to understanding how deviant subcultures are generated.
Merton’s Strain Theory: Core Concepts
Merton’s theory builds upon Émile Durkheim’s concept of anomie – a state of normlessness where social regulation breaks down. However, Merton refined this by focusing not on the breakdown of norms themselves, but on the gap between culturally prescribed goals and the legitimate means to achieve them. He posited that this structural strain leads to five basic adaptations:
The Five Adaptations and Deviant Subcultures
Each adaptation represents a different response to the strain, and some of these responses lead to the formation of deviant subcultures.
1. Conformity
This is the most common adaptation. Conformists accept both the culturally defined goals and the legitimate means to achieve them. They are not considered deviant. This doesn't contribute to the formation of deviant subcultures.
2. Innovation
Innovators accept the goals but reject the legitimate means. They seek to achieve success through illegitimate means, such as theft, fraud, or drug dealing. This is a key driver of criminal subcultures. For example, organized crime syndicates exemplify innovation, pursuing wealth through illegal activities.
3. Ritualism
Ritualists abandon the goals but rigidly adhere to the legitimate means. They may go through the motions of following the rules without expecting to achieve significant success. This adaptation doesn’t necessarily lead to a deviant subculture in the same way as innovation, but it can contribute to a sense of apathy and disengagement. Bureaucratic rigidity can be seen as an example of ritualism.
4. Retreatism
Retreatists reject both the goals and the means. They withdraw from society, often becoming outcasts, vagrants, or substance abusers. This adaptation often leads to the formation of ‘beggar’ or ‘homeless’ subcultures, characterized by marginalization and social exclusion. Individuals experiencing severe mental health issues or chronic addiction often fall into this category.
5. Rebellion
Rebels reject both the goals and the means and actively seek to replace them with new ones. They challenge the existing social order and advocate for radical change. This adaptation fuels political and revolutionary subcultures. Examples include revolutionary movements advocating for systemic change, like the Naxalite movement in India, which rejects the existing socio-economic structure and seeks to establish a new order.
How Subcultures are Generated
Deviant subcultures are generated when individuals adopting similar adaptations come together and create their own norms, values, and practices that support their chosen response to strain. These subcultures provide:
- Means of achieving goals: Criminal subcultures provide training and opportunities for illegitimate income generation.
- Justification for deviance: Subcultures offer rationalizations and explanations for their actions, reducing guilt and shame.
- Social support: Subcultures provide a sense of belonging and solidarity, offering emotional support and protection.
- Alternative value systems: Rebellious subcultures develop alternative ideologies that challenge the dominant social order.
The strength and persistence of a deviant subculture depend on factors such as the degree of strain experienced by its members, the availability of alternative opportunities, and the level of social control exerted by the wider society.
| Adaptation | Goals | Means | Deviant Subculture | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovation | Accept | Reject | Criminal | Mafia, Drug Cartels |
| Ritualism | Reject | Accept | None (Apathy) | Overly bureaucratic organizations |
| Retreatism | Reject | Reject | Homeless/Beggar | Chronic substance abusers |
| Rebellion | Reject | Reject | Revolutionary/Political | Naxalite movement in India |
Conclusion
In conclusion, Merton’s Strain Theory provides a powerful framework for understanding how societal structures can contribute to the generation of deviant subcultures. The discrepancy between culturally valued goals and the availability of legitimate means creates strain, leading individuals to adopt various adaptations, some of which manifest as collective deviance. Recognizing these adaptations and the conditions that foster them is crucial for developing effective strategies to address crime, social unrest, and other forms of social pathology. Further research should explore the intersection of strain theory with other sociological perspectives, such as social learning theory and control theory, to provide a more nuanced understanding of deviance.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.