UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-I202020 Marks
Q14.

Solve for the equilibrium levels of output denoted (respectively by Yu and Yo) in the two scenarios-presence and absence of income tax in the economy.

How to Approach

This question requires a thorough understanding of the Keynesian model of income determination. The approach should involve first outlining the basic Keynesian model without taxes, deriving the equilibrium income (Yo). Then, the model should be extended to include income taxes, and the new equilibrium income (Yu) derived. The answer should clearly demonstrate the impact of taxation on the equilibrium level of output. A comparative analysis highlighting the difference between the two scenarios is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The determination of equilibrium income is a cornerstone of macroeconomic analysis. The Keynesian theory posits that the level of output and income in an economy is determined by the aggregate demand. This demand, in turn, is influenced by consumption, investment, government spending, and net exports. The introduction of income tax significantly alters the disposable income available to households, thereby impacting consumption and ultimately, the equilibrium level of output. This answer will analyze the equilibrium levels of output in the presence and absence of income tax, demonstrating the multiplier effect and the impact of fiscal policy.

Keynesian Model Without Income Tax

In a simple Keynesian model, aggregate expenditure (AE) is the sum of consumption expenditure (C) and investment expenditure (I). Consumption is a function of income, represented as C = a + bY, where 'a' is autonomous consumption and 'b' is the marginal propensity to consume (MPC). Investment is assumed to be autonomous. Therefore, AE = a + bY + I.

Equilibrium occurs when AE = Y, where Y is the national income. Substituting the AE equation, we get: Y = a + bY + I. Solving for Y, we obtain the equilibrium income (Yo):

Yo = (a + I) / (1 - b)

This equation shows that the equilibrium income is determined by autonomous spending (a + I) and the multiplier (1 / (1 - b)).

Keynesian Model With Income Tax

When income tax is introduced, disposable income (Yd) becomes Y - T, where T is the tax amount. Consumption now depends on disposable income, so C = a + bYd = a + b(Y - T). Aggregate expenditure becomes AE = a + b(Y - T) + I.

Equilibrium occurs when AE = Y. Substituting the AE equation, we get: Y = a + b(Y - T) + I. Solving for Y, we obtain the equilibrium income (Yu):

Y = a + bY - bT + I

Y - bY = a - bT + I

Yu = (a - bT + I) / (1 - b)

This equation shows that the equilibrium income is now affected by the tax amount (T). The introduction of income tax reduces the disposable income and consequently, the equilibrium income.

Comparative Analysis

Comparing the two equilibrium income levels, we can see the impact of income tax:

  • Yo = (a + I) / (1 - b)
  • Yu = (a - bT + I) / (1 - b)

The difference between the two is:

Yo - Yu = (bT) / (1 - b)

This shows that the reduction in equilibrium income due to income tax is equal to the tax amount multiplied by the multiplier. The higher the MPC (b), the larger the reduction in equilibrium income.

The following table summarizes the key differences:

Feature Without Income Tax With Income Tax
Consumption Function C = a + bY C = a + b(Y - T)
Aggregate Expenditure AE = a + bY + I AE = a + b(Y - T) + I
Equilibrium Income Yo = (a + I) / (1 - b) Yu = (a - bT + I) / (1 - b)
Impact of Tax Not Applicable Reduces equilibrium income

The introduction of income tax acts as a contractionary fiscal policy, reducing aggregate demand and lowering the equilibrium level of output. The magnitude of this reduction depends on the size of the tax and the value of the MPC.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the presence of income tax significantly alters the equilibrium level of output in the Keynesian model. Without tax, equilibrium income (Yo) is determined solely by autonomous spending and the multiplier. However, with income tax, equilibrium income (Yu) is reduced due to the decrease in disposable income and subsequent reduction in consumption. The extent of this reduction is directly proportional to the tax rate and the marginal propensity to consume. Understanding this relationship is crucial for policymakers when designing fiscal policies to stabilize the economy.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC)
The proportion of an increase in disposable income that is spent on consumption. It is calculated as the change in consumption divided by the change in disposable income.
Autonomous Spending
Spending that is independent of the level of income in the economy. This includes investment, government spending, and exports.

Key Statistics

India's tax-to-GDP ratio was approximately 11.8% in FY23 (Provisional Estimates).

Source: Press Information Bureau, Government of India (as of knowledge cutoff - 2023)

According to the World Bank, India's GDP growth rate was 7.2% in FY23.

Source: World Bank (as of knowledge cutoff - 2023)

Examples

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009

This stimulus package included tax cuts aimed at boosting disposable income and stimulating consumption during the Great Recession. The effectiveness of these tax cuts in raising aggregate demand was a subject of debate among economists.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if the tax rate is very high?

If the tax rate is very high, disposable income will be significantly reduced, leading to a substantial decrease in consumption and a potentially large contraction in equilibrium income. This could lead to a recessionary spiral.