Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
A flexible exchange rate system, also known as a floating exchange rate, is a regime where a country’s currency value is determined by the forces of supply and demand in the foreign exchange market, with minimal government intervention. This contrasts with fixed or pegged exchange rate systems. While proponents argue that flexibility allows for automatic adjustment to economic shocks and promotes trade balance, critics contend that it can lead to volatility, unfair competitive advantages through currency manipulation, and distortions in free trade. The increasing prevalence of flexible exchange rates globally, particularly after the breakdown of the Bretton Woods system in the 1970s, necessitates a thorough understanding of its performance and associated challenges.
Understanding Flexible Exchange Rates and Theoretical Benefits
Under a flexible exchange rate system, the value of a currency fluctuates based on market forces. Several theoretical benefits are often cited:
- Automatic Stabilizer: Exchange rate adjustments can automatically correct trade imbalances. A trade deficit leads to currency depreciation, making exports cheaper and imports more expensive, thus reducing the deficit.
- Monetary Policy Independence: A flexible exchange rate allows a country to pursue independent monetary policy tailored to its domestic needs, without being constrained by the need to maintain a fixed exchange rate.
- Reduced Need for Reserves: Countries with flexible exchange rates generally require lower levels of foreign exchange reserves compared to those with fixed rates.
Criticisms and Distortions in Free Trade
Despite the theoretical benefits, flexible exchange rates face significant criticism, particularly regarding their impact on free trade:
Exchange Rate Volatility
One of the primary criticisms is the inherent volatility of exchange rates. Sudden and large fluctuations can create uncertainty for businesses involved in international trade, increasing risks and discouraging investment. This volatility can disrupt supply chains and lead to suboptimal trade patterns.
Currency Manipulation
Critics argue that countries may deliberately manipulate their currencies to gain an unfair competitive advantage in international trade. This can involve interventions in the foreign exchange market to depreciate the currency, making exports cheaper and imports more expensive. The US, for example, has frequently accused China of currency manipulation, although China has largely ceased direct intervention in recent years.
Impact on Trade Balances
While exchange rate adjustments are supposed to correct trade imbalances, the relationship is not always straightforward. The J-curve effect demonstrates that a currency depreciation may initially worsen the trade balance before improving it, as it takes time for trade volumes to adjust to the new exchange rate. Furthermore, the Marshall-Lerner condition (the sum of the price elasticities of demand for exports and imports must be greater than one) must be met for depreciation to improve the trade balance. If this condition isn't met, depreciation can worsen the trade deficit.
Distortions in Investment Flows
Exchange rate volatility can also distort international investment flows. Investors may be hesitant to invest in countries with volatile currencies, leading to capital flight and hindering economic development.
How Economies Perform Under Flexible Exchange Rates: Examples
The performance of economies under flexible exchange rates varies significantly depending on their specific circumstances:
- United States: The US operates under a largely flexible exchange rate regime. While it benefits from monetary policy independence, it also experiences exchange rate volatility, impacting its trade balance and manufacturing sector.
- Japan: Japan has historically intervened in the foreign exchange market to manage the value of the Yen, particularly to prevent excessive appreciation. This intervention has been criticized by some as currency manipulation.
- India: India follows a managed float exchange rate system, where the exchange rate is largely determined by market forces but the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) intervenes to manage volatility and prevent excessive fluctuations. The RBI’s interventions are often aimed at smoothing exchange rate movements and maintaining financial stability.
The Role of Central Bank Intervention
Central bank intervention in the foreign exchange market can mitigate some of the negative effects of flexible exchange rates. However, intervention is not without its limitations. Excessive intervention can deplete foreign exchange reserves and may not be effective in the long run if it goes against underlying economic fundamentals. Sterilized intervention (where the central bank offsets the impact of intervention on the money supply) is often used, but its effectiveness is debated.
Conclusion
Flexible exchange rate systems offer benefits such as monetary policy independence and automatic stabilization, but they are not without their drawbacks. The potential for volatility, currency manipulation, and distortions in trade remain significant concerns. The optimal exchange rate regime for a country depends on its specific economic circumstances, including its trade patterns, capital flows, and level of economic development. Effective management of exchange rate volatility through prudent monetary policy and, when necessary, carefully calibrated intervention is crucial for maximizing the benefits and minimizing the risks of a flexible exchange rate system.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.