UPSC MainsENGLISH-LITERATURE-PAPER-I202015 Marks
Q26.

What attitudes to marriage can be discerned in Jane Austen's account of Mr. and Mrs. Bennet, Charlotte Lucas and Mr. Collins, and Lydia Bennet and Mr. Wickham in Pride and Prejudice?

How to Approach

This question requires a close reading of *Pride and Prejudice* and an understanding of the societal context of marriage in 19th-century England. The answer should analyze the motivations and outcomes of the marriages (or attempted marriages) of the specified characters – the Bennets, Charlotte Lucas & Mr. Collins, and Lydia Bennet & Mr. Wickham. Focus on how Austen portrays different attitudes towards marriage: for love, for security, for social climbing, and for impulsive gratification. Structure the answer by examining each pairing individually, then drawing broader conclusions about Austen’s commentary on marriage.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Jane Austen’s *Pride and Prejudice*, published in 1813, offers a nuanced portrayal of marriage within the constraints of English society. Marriage was not merely a matter of personal affection but a crucial economic and social transaction, particularly for women who lacked independent means. Austen meticulously examines the various motivations driving individuals towards matrimony, exposing the societal pressures and individual desires that shaped marital choices. Through the contrasting experiences of characters like the Bennets, Charlotte Lucas, and Lydia Bennet, Austen critiques the prevailing attitudes towards marriage, highlighting the dangers of prioritizing security over love, or impulsiveness over prudence. This essay will explore the diverse attitudes to marriage discernible in Austen’s depiction of these key relationships.

Mr. and Mrs. Bennet: A Marriage of Disappointment

The marriage of Mr. and Mrs. Bennet serves as a cautionary tale. Initially based on attraction – Mr. Bennet’s wit appealing to Mrs. Bennet’s vanity – it quickly deteriorates into mutual contempt and frustration. Mrs. Bennet’s sole focus is securing advantageous marriages for her daughters, driven by economic necessity and social ambition. Mr. Bennet, while intellectually superior, retreats into sarcasm and detachment, failing to provide emotional support or guidance. Their marriage lacks affection, respect, and intellectual companionship. Austen presents this union as a consequence of marrying without careful consideration of compatibility, highlighting the potential for long-term unhappiness. It demonstrates a pragmatic, yet ultimately flawed, approach to marriage based on superficial qualities.

Charlotte Lucas and Mr. Collins: Marriage as a Practical Arrangement

Charlotte Lucas’s marriage to Mr. Collins represents a stark contrast to the romantic ideals often associated with marriage. Charlotte, facing limited prospects due to her plain appearance and lack of fortune, prioritizes security and independence over love. Mr. Collins, a pompous and obsequious clergyman, offers her a comfortable home and social standing. Austen does not condemn Charlotte’s decision outright, acknowledging the difficult circumstances faced by women of her time. However, she subtly critiques the pragmatism that leads Charlotte to accept a loveless marriage. This pairing illustrates the societal pressures that forced women to view marriage as a means of survival rather than a source of happiness. It’s a calculated decision, devoid of passion, and focused solely on practical benefits.

Lydia Bennet and Mr. Wickham: Marriage Driven by Impulsiveness and Scandal

The elopement and subsequent marriage of Lydia Bennet and Mr. Wickham exemplify the dangers of impulsiveness and a lack of moral restraint. Lydia, a frivolous and immature young woman, is easily captivated by Wickham’s charm and superficial attractiveness. Wickham, a manipulative and self-serving officer, initially seeks to seduce Lydia for financial gain. Their marriage is born out of scandal and is initially a source of immense shame for the Bennet family. While ultimately resolved through Darcy’s intervention and a financial settlement, the marriage remains precarious and lacks a solid foundation of affection or respect. Austen uses this pairing to demonstrate the devastating consequences of prioritizing immediate gratification over prudence and social responsibility. It’s a marriage built on deception and fueled by Lydia’s vanity and Wickham’s opportunism.

Comparative Analysis

Couple Motivation for Marriage Outcome/Austen’s Commentary
Mr. & Mrs. Bennet Initial attraction, followed by societal expectations Mutual contempt, unhappiness, cautionary tale
Charlotte Lucas & Mr. Collins Security, independence, pragmatic considerations Stable but loveless, critique of societal pressures
Lydia Bennet & Mr. Wickham Impulsiveness, attraction, scandal Precarious, potentially unhappy, consequences of recklessness

Through these contrasting portrayals, Austen reveals a complex and often critical perspective on marriage. She doesn’t advocate for a single ideal, but rather highlights the importance of marrying for a combination of love, respect, and compatibility. The novel suggests that while economic security is important, it should not be the sole basis for a marital decision. Austen also emphasizes the need for moral responsibility and prudence, warning against the dangers of impulsiveness and social climbing.

Conclusion

In *Pride and Prejudice*, Jane Austen masterfully dissects the multifaceted attitudes towards marriage prevalent in 19th-century England. Through the contrasting experiences of the Bennets, Charlotte Lucas, and Lydia Bennet, she exposes the societal pressures, economic realities, and individual desires that shaped marital choices. Austen’s nuanced portrayal suggests that a successful marriage requires a balance of practical considerations and genuine affection, cautioning against the pitfalls of marrying solely for security, social status, or impulsive gratification. Ultimately, the novel champions the importance of marrying for love and mutual respect, a sentiment embodied in the eventual union of Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Primogeniture
A system where the eldest son inherits all of a parent’s money and property. This practice, common in Austen’s time, significantly impacted women’s marriage prospects as they lacked independent means.
Entailment
A legal restriction on inheritance, typically preventing a property from being passed down to female heirs. This was a significant plot device in *Pride and Prejudice*, as the Bennet estate was entailed to a male heir.

Key Statistics

In the early 19th century, the average age of marriage for women in England was between 21 and 23, while for men it was between 25 and 27. (Source: Stone, Lawrence. *Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500-1800*.)

Source: Stone, Lawrence. *Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500-1800*

Approximately 80% of women in England during the Regency period (1811-1820) did not have independent wealth and relied on marriage for financial security. (Source: Perkin, Joan. *Women and Marriage in Nineteenth-Century England*.)

Source: Perkin, Joan. *Women and Marriage in Nineteenth-Century England*

Examples

The Marriage Market in Bath

The city of Bath, depicted in Austen’s *Persuasion*, served as a prominent “marriage market” where families would bring their daughters to socialize and attract potential husbands. This highlights the social ritualization of finding a spouse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Charlotte Lucas’s marriage so controversial?

Charlotte’s marriage is controversial because she knowingly sacrifices personal happiness for financial security, accepting a proposal from a man she doesn’t love. This challenges romantic ideals and raises questions about the limitations placed on women’s choices.

Topics Covered

LiteratureNovelAustenNovelMarriage