Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification 2006 provides the regulatory framework for assessing the environmental impacts of developmental projects in India. It mandates that certain projects obtain environmental clearance before commencement. The Draft EIA Notification 2020, proposed by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), aimed to replace the 2006 notification, sparking significant debate. The draft notification proposed several changes, many of which were criticized for potentially weakening environmental safeguards and reducing public participation. This answer will detail the key differences between the two notifications.
Key Differences between Draft EIA Notification 2020 and EIA Notification 2006
The Draft EIA Notification 2020 proposed significant alterations to the existing framework. Several provisions were contentious, raising concerns about environmental protection. Here’s a detailed comparison:
1. Public Consultation
- EIA 2006: Mandated public consultation for Category A and B1 projects, involving site-specific consultations and consideration of objections.
- Draft EIA 2020: Proposed to exempt a wide range of projects from prior environmental clearance and public consultation, including inland waterways, minor minerals, and projects deemed strategically important. It also reduced the public consultation period from 30 to 20 days.
2. Project Categorization
- EIA 2006: Categorized projects into Category A (requiring appraisal at the central level) and Category B (appraised at the state level). Category B was further divided into B1 (requiring EIA) and B2 (requiring Environmental Management Plan - EMP).
- Draft EIA 2020: Introduced a new category – ‘Strategic Projects’ – which were exempt from many provisions, including public consultation. It also broadened the scope of projects falling under Category B2, requiring only EMP instead of a full EIA.
3. Compliance Reporting
- EIA 2006: Required project proponents to submit annual compliance reports to the regulatory authorities.
- Draft EIA 2020: Proposed self-reporting of compliance, reducing the frequency of inspections and potentially weakening enforcement.
4. Validity of Clearance
- EIA 2006: Environmental clearances were generally valid for 10 years.
- Draft EIA 2020: Proposed extending the validity of clearances to projects like mining to 50 years, raising concerns about long-term environmental impacts.
5. Penalties
- EIA 2006: Prescribed penalties for violations, but these were often considered inadequate.
- Draft EIA 2020: Proposed a diluted penalty system with options for monetary penalties instead of imprisonment, potentially reducing deterrence.
The following table summarizes the key differences:
| Feature | EIA Notification 2006 | Draft EIA Notification 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| Public Consultation | Mandatory for Category A & B1 projects | Exemptions for many projects; Reduced consultation period |
| Project Categorization | Category A, B1, B2 | Added ‘Strategic Projects’ category with exemptions; Broadened B2 scope |
| Compliance Reporting | Annual reports to authorities | Self-reporting; Reduced inspections |
| Clearance Validity | 10 years | Up to 50 years for some projects |
| Penalties | Penalties for violations | Diluted penalty system; Monetary penalties over imprisonment |
The draft notification faced widespread criticism from environmental activists, NGOs, and opposition parties, who argued that it would weaken environmental safeguards and prioritize economic development over environmental protection. The notification was ultimately not finalized in its original form, and the MoEFCC has indicated that it is considering revisions based on the feedback received.
Conclusion
The Draft EIA Notification 2020 represented a significant departure from the existing EIA Notification 2006, proposing changes that would have potentially weakened environmental regulations and reduced public participation. While the intention was to streamline the environmental clearance process, the proposed changes sparked concerns about their potential impact on environmental sustainability. The future of environmental impact assessment in India hinges on striking a balance between promoting development and safeguarding the environment, ensuring robust public participation and effective enforcement mechanisms.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.