UPSC MainsPSYCHOLOGY-PAPER-II202010 Marks150 Words
Q3.

Arbitrariness in the application of rule of law is a primary cause of poor governance." Discuss.

How to Approach

This question requires a discussion on the link between arbitrary application of law and poor governance. A good answer will define both 'rule of law' and 'arbitrariness', explain how the latter undermines the former, and illustrate this with examples. The structure should be: Introduction defining key terms, Body detailing the mechanisms through which arbitrariness impacts governance (economic, social, political), and Conclusion summarizing the argument and suggesting ways forward. Focus on providing concrete examples and linking it to Indian context.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The ‘Rule of Law’ is a fundamental principle of good governance, signifying that all individuals and institutions are subject to and accountable under the law, which is fairly applied and enforced. However, its effective implementation is often hampered by ‘arbitrariness’ – the exercise of power in a capricious or unreasonable manner. This arbitrary application of law, whether intentional or due to systemic flaws, erodes public trust, hinders development, and ultimately leads to poor governance. Recent instances of selective enforcement of laws and perceived biases in judicial processes highlight the continuing relevance of this issue in India.

Understanding the Link: Arbitrariness and Poor Governance

Arbitrariness in the application of the rule of law manifests in several ways, directly impacting various facets of governance:

Economic Impact

  • Reduced Investment: When laws are applied inconsistently, businesses face uncertainty, discouraging both domestic and foreign investment. For example, retrospective taxation (like the Vodafone case of 2012) created a climate of fear and distrust among investors.
  • Corruption & Rent-Seeking: Arbitrary enforcement creates opportunities for corruption. Officials may demand bribes to overlook violations or to selectively enforce rules against competitors.
  • Hindered Economic Growth: Unpredictable regulations and inconsistent application of contracts stifle entrepreneurship and innovation, slowing down economic growth.

Social Impact

  • Erosion of Trust: Arbitrary actions by law enforcement or the judiciary erode public trust in institutions, leading to social unrest and a breakdown of social order.
  • Discrimination & Inequality: Selective enforcement of laws can disproportionately affect marginalized communities, exacerbating existing inequalities. The disproportionate conviction rates of certain communities under laws like sedition are often cited as examples.
  • Denial of Justice: Arbitrary delays in judicial proceedings and biased judgments deny citizens access to justice, undermining the fundamental principles of fairness and equality.

Political Impact

  • Weakening of Democracy: Arbitrary use of power by the state weakens democratic institutions and principles. The misuse of preventive detention laws or laws related to public order can suppress dissent and curtail fundamental rights.
  • Increased Political Polarization: Perceptions of bias in the application of law can fuel political polarization and create divisions within society.
  • Accountability Deficit: When those in power are not held accountable for their actions, it creates a culture of impunity and undermines the rule of law.

Mechanisms Contributing to Arbitrariness

Factor Description Impact
Vague Laws Laws that are poorly defined or open to interpretation. Allows for subjective application and potential for misuse.
Lack of Transparency Absence of clear procedures and public access to information. Creates opportunities for arbitrary decision-making.
Political Interference Undue influence of political actors on law enforcement and the judiciary. Compromises impartiality and fairness.
Capacity Constraints Insufficient resources, training, and infrastructure within the legal system. Leads to delays, backlogs, and inconsistent application of law.

The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2008) highlighted the need for simplifying laws and procedures, promoting transparency, and strengthening accountability mechanisms to address arbitrariness in governance.

Conclusion

Arbitrariness in the application of the rule of law is undeniably a significant impediment to good governance. It undermines economic progress, erodes social trust, and weakens democratic institutions. Addressing this requires a multi-pronged approach, including simplifying laws, enhancing transparency, strengthening judicial independence, and promoting a culture of accountability. Investing in capacity building within the legal system and fostering a greater awareness of citizens’ rights are also crucial steps towards ensuring a fair and just society where the rule of law prevails.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Rule of Law
The principle that all persons and institutions are subject to and accountable to laws that are fairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law rather than by men.
Arbitrariness
The exercise of power in a capricious, unreasonable, or despotic manner; a lack of predictable standards or principles in decision-making.

Key Statistics

As of 2023, India ranks 49th out of 140 countries in the Rule of Law Index published by the World Justice Project.

Source: World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index 2023

According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data (2022), over 70% of undertrial prisoners have been in jail for more than six months, indicating significant delays in the judicial process.

Source: NCRB, Prison Statistics India 2022

Examples

The Shah Bano Case (1985)

This case involved a Muslim woman seeking maintenance from her divorced husband. The Supreme Court’s ruling, while upholding her right to maintenance, faced significant political backlash and ultimately led to the enactment of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, which diluted the court’s decision, demonstrating political interference in judicial matters.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does judicial delay contribute to arbitrariness?

Prolonged delays in judicial proceedings create uncertainty and can effectively deny justice, as the legal process itself becomes a form of punishment. It also encourages frivolous litigation and undermines the credibility of the legal system.

Topics Covered

Political SciencePublic AdministrationGovernanceRule of LawAccountability