UPSC MainsPUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION-PAPER-II202020 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q24.

Police needs to be made accountable and freed from the grip of politics. It is a big challenge not only for law and order but also for the development of the country. Critically examine.

How to Approach

This question requires a critical analysis of the need for police accountability and its detachment from political influence, linking it to broader national development. The answer should begin by defining accountability and outlining the current issues plaguing the Indian police system. It should then delve into the consequences of political interference, examining its impact on law and order, investigations, and public trust. Finally, it should discuss potential solutions, including reforms suggested by various committees and the importance of a professional, independent police force for overall development. A balanced approach acknowledging the complexities is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The concept of ‘police’ evokes images of maintaining law and order, but its effectiveness is intrinsically linked to its accountability and independence. In India, the police force, often described as a tool of the state, frequently finds itself entangled in political maneuvering, hindering its ability to perform its duties impartially. This situation not only compromises the rule of law but also poses a significant impediment to the socio-economic development of the country. Recent events, such as allegations of biased investigations in politically sensitive cases, underscore the urgent need for police reforms and a clear demarcation between political influence and professional policing.

The Current State of Police Accountability in India

Currently, police accountability in India is multi-layered but often ineffective. It includes internal accountability mechanisms (inspections, departmental inquiries), external oversight (judicial review, state human rights commissions), and political accountability (through the chain of command). However, these mechanisms are often plagued by weaknesses. Internal inquiries are often biased, external oversight bodies lack sufficient powers, and political accountability frequently translates into political interference.

The Grip of Politics on the Police

Political interference manifests in several ways:

  • Transfers and Postings: Frequent transfers based on political considerations disrupt continuity and expertise.
  • Investigation of Cases: Politicians often exert pressure on investigating officers to favor certain outcomes, particularly in cases involving their supporters or opponents.
  • Resource Allocation: Allocation of resources (personnel, vehicles, funds) is often influenced by political priorities rather than crime rates or public safety needs.
  • Law and Order Management: Political considerations often dictate how law and order situations are handled, leading to biased policing.

This interference erodes public trust in the police, leading to reluctance to report crimes and cooperate with investigations. It also fosters a culture of impunity among those with political connections.

Impact on Law and Order and Development

The consequences of a politically compromised police force are far-reaching:

  • Increased Crime Rates: A demoralized and ineffective police force is less able to deter and investigate crime.
  • Erosion of Rule of Law: Political interference undermines the principle of equality before the law.
  • Hindrance to Investment: A weak law and order situation discourages both domestic and foreign investment.
  • Social Unrest: Perceptions of injustice and bias can lead to social unrest and protests.
  • Impact on Economic Growth: A stable and predictable environment is crucial for economic growth, which is jeopardized by a compromised police force.

Reforms Needed to Ensure Accountability and Independence

Several committees have recommended reforms to address these issues:

Committee Year Key Recommendations
National Police Commission 1981 State Security Commissions, Model Police Act, separation of investigation and law & order duties.
Ribeiro Committee 1998 Increased investment in police infrastructure, improved training, and greater accountability.
Solomon Aarpori Committee 2006 Focus on community policing, strengthening intelligence gathering, and improving police-public relations.
Justice Verma Committee 2013 Comprehensive police reforms, including strengthening internal accountability mechanisms and ensuring gender sensitivity.

Key reforms include:

  • Constitutional Amendment: To guarantee the independence of the police.
  • State Security Commissions: Empowered to oversee police functioning and ensure accountability.
  • Model Police Act: Enactment of a comprehensive law governing police organization, functioning, and accountability.
  • Separation of Investigation and Law & Order: To allow investigators to focus on their work without political pressure.
  • Strengthening Internal Accountability Mechanisms: Including independent complaint redressal mechanisms.
  • Improved Training and Capacity Building: To enhance professional skills and ethical standards.
  • Community Policing: To build trust and cooperation between the police and the public.

The implementation of the Prakash Singh judgment (2006) directing states to implement police reforms remains a significant challenge. Many states have been reluctant to fully comply, citing concerns about state autonomy.

Conclusion

Making the police accountable and freeing it from political interference is not merely a matter of law and order; it is fundamental to the development of a just and equitable society. A professional, independent, and accountable police force is essential for attracting investment, fostering economic growth, and ensuring social harmony. While numerous committees have proposed reforms, their effective implementation requires strong political will and a commitment to upholding the rule of law. Delaying these reforms will continue to undermine the foundations of good governance and hinder India’s progress.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Accountability
Accountability refers to the obligation to explain, justify, and take responsibility for one's actions and decisions. In the context of policing, it encompasses mechanisms to ensure that police officers are answerable for their conduct and performance.
Rule of Law
The Rule of Law is a fundamental principle of governance that states that all individuals and institutions are subject to and accountable to the law, which is fairly applied and enforced. It ensures equality before the law and prevents arbitrary exercise of power.

Key Statistics

As per the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data (2022), the conviction rate in India is around 30.3%, indicating challenges in investigation and prosecution.

Source: NCRB, Crime in India Report 2022

According to a 2019 study by the Common Cause and the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), only 26% of Indians trust the police.

Source: Common Cause & CSDS, State of India’s Democracy Report 2019 (Knowledge Cutoff)

Examples

The Uttar Pradesh Police Transfers Case (2021)

In 2021, Uttar Pradesh witnessed a large number of transfers of police officers, particularly IPS officers, shortly after the change in government. This highlighted the vulnerability of the police force to political influence and the disruption caused by frequent transfers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are states reluctant to implement police reforms?

States often resist police reforms due to concerns about losing control over the police force, which is seen as an instrument of state power. They also fear that reforms may dilute their authority and autonomy.

Topics Covered

PolityLawPolice ReformsLaw and OrderGovernance