UPSC MainsBOTANY-PAPER-I202120 Marks
Q8.

Discuss about the names of causal organisms, symptoms, disease cycle and management of loose smut of wheat. What are the differences between rust and smut fungi?

How to Approach

This question requires a detailed understanding of a specific plant pathology – loose smut of wheat. The answer should be structured to cover the causal organism, symptoms at different stages, the disease cycle, and management strategies. Crucially, it also asks for a comparative analysis between rust and smut fungi, demanding a clear articulation of their differences in terms of morphology, infection mechanisms, and economic impact. A systematic approach, utilizing headings and subheadings, will enhance clarity and ensure all aspects of the question are addressed.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Loose smut, caused by the fungus *Ustilago tritici*, is a significant seed-borne disease of wheat, leading to substantial yield losses globally. It’s characterized by the replacement of wheat grains with black, powdery spores, hence the name ‘loose’ smut. The disease has been a concern for wheat production for centuries, and its management is crucial for ensuring food security. Understanding the disease cycle and implementing effective control measures are vital for sustainable wheat cultivation. This answer will detail the causal organism, symptoms, disease cycle, management, and differences between rust and smut fungi.

Causal Organism

The causal organism of loose smut of wheat is *Ustilago tritici*. It is a basidiomycete fungus belonging to the family Ustilaginaceae. The fungus exists in two forms: a yeast-like form within the plant tissues and a spore form (teliospore) on the surface of the infected grain.

Symptoms

Early Symptoms

Early symptoms are often absent as the infection is systemic. However, infected seedlings may exhibit stunted growth and slightly yellowish leaves. These symptoms are often non-specific and easily overlooked.

Visible Symptoms

The most characteristic symptom appears at maturity. Instead of healthy grains, infected plants produce black, powdery masses of teliospores, replacing the kernels. These spore masses are easily dislodged, giving the disease its name "loose" smut. The spike may also be partially or completely covered with the black powdery mass.

Internal Symptoms

When a diseased grain is crushed, it reveals a dark, powdery mass of teliospores filling the kernel. The endosperm is completely replaced by the fungal spores.

Disease Cycle

The disease cycle of loose smut is complex and involves the following stages:

  • Infection: Infection occurs through spores landing on the coleoptile (protective sheath covering the emerging shoot) of germinating wheat seedlings.
  • Systemic Infection: The fungus penetrates the coleoptile and becomes systemic, residing within the plant tissues without causing visible symptoms until heading.
  • Sporulation: At the time of heading, the fungus differentiates and produces teliospores within the grain, replacing the kernel.
  • Dissemination: The teliospores are released during harvesting, threshing, and winnowing, spreading the infection to new fields.

Management of Loose Smut

Cultural Practices

  • Seed Treatment: Treating seeds with systemic fungicides like carboxin, thiram, or triadimefon is the most effective control measure.
  • Use of Resistant Varieties: Planting wheat varieties resistant to loose smut can significantly reduce disease incidence.
  • Crop Rotation: Rotating wheat with non-host crops can help reduce the inoculum level in the soil.
  • Clean Seed: Using certified, disease-free seeds is crucial to prevent the introduction of the pathogen.

Chemical Control

Seed treatment with fungicides remains the primary chemical control method. Foliar sprays are generally not effective as the fungus is systemic.

Biological Control

Research is ongoing to explore the potential of using antagonistic microorganisms to control loose smut, but this is not yet widely adopted.

Differences between Rust and Smut Fungi

Feature Rust Fungi (e.g., *Puccinia graminis*) Smut Fungi (e.g., *Ustilago tritici*)
Taxonomic Class Urediniomycetes Ustilaginomycetes
Spore Color Reddish-brown, yellow, or black (depending on the species) Black, powdery
Symptoms Pustules (uredinia, telia) on leaves, stems, and grains Replacement of grains with black, powdery spore masses
Infection Site Leaves and stems primarily Coleoptile of germinating seedlings
Disease Cycle Complexity Often complex, involving multiple hosts (heteroecious) Relatively simpler, often autoecious
Economic Impact Can cause significant yield losses, especially in epidemics Causes substantial yield losses, particularly in susceptible varieties

Conclusion

Loose smut of wheat remains a significant threat to global wheat production, necessitating integrated disease management strategies. Seed treatment with fungicides and the use of resistant varieties are the most effective control measures. Understanding the differences between rust and smut fungi is crucial for accurate diagnosis and implementation of appropriate control strategies. Continued research into biological control methods and the development of new resistant varieties are essential for sustainable wheat production in the face of evolving pathogen populations.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Teliospore
A thick-walled, resting spore of a smut or rust fungus, formed in the late stages of the disease cycle. It is the primary means of survival and dissemination of the pathogen.
Systemic Infection
An infection where the pathogen spreads throughout the plant tissues, often without visible external symptoms initially. This makes control more challenging as the pathogen is protected within the plant.

Key Statistics

Global wheat production losses due to smut diseases, including loose smut, are estimated to be around 5-10% annually.

Source: FAOSTAT, 2023 (Knowledge Cutoff: 2023)

The use of fungicide seed treatment has been shown to reduce loose smut incidence by up to 90% in susceptible wheat varieties.

Source: Plant Pathology Journal, 2020 (Knowledge Cutoff: 2023)

Examples

Impact in India

In India, loose smut outbreaks have been reported in several wheat-growing regions, particularly in the Indo-Gangetic Plain, causing significant economic losses to farmers. The disease is often more severe in areas with high humidity and susceptible wheat varieties.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can loose smut affect other cereals besides wheat?

While *Ustilago tritici* specifically infects wheat, other *Ustilago* species can cause smut diseases in barley, oats, and rye. These are distinct pathogens but share similar disease characteristics.

Topics Covered

BotanyPlant PathologyAgricultureFungal DiseasesWheatPlant Protection