UPSC MainsPHILOSOPHY-PAPER-II202110 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q17.

Is religious freedom possible in a multireligious society? Explain.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of political theory, particularly concerning the relationship between individual rights and societal harmony. The answer should define religious freedom, acknowledge the challenges posed by a multireligious society (potential for conflict, differing values), and then explore mechanisms – both theoretical and practical – that can facilitate its possibility. Structure the answer by first defining the concept, then outlining the challenges, and finally, discussing conditions and approaches for achieving religious freedom. Referencing relevant philosophical perspectives (e.g., John Locke, John Rawls) will enhance the answer.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Religious freedom, at its core, is the principle that individuals should be free to practice (or not practice) any religion without fear of persecution or discrimination. This right is enshrined in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and is a cornerstone of liberal democratic thought. However, the question of its feasibility in a multireligious society is complex. Such societies, characterized by a diversity of beliefs and practices, often grapple with tensions arising from competing claims, differing moral codes, and the potential for social fragmentation. This answer will explore whether genuine religious freedom is possible within this context, and what conditions are necessary for its realization.

Defining Religious Freedom and its Scope

Religious freedom isn’t merely tolerance; it’s a positive right to manifest one’s religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice, and observance. This includes both individual and collective dimensions. However, this freedom isn’t absolute. It is often subject to limitations necessary to protect public order, health, morals, and the fundamental rights and freedoms of others, as articulated by many constitutions and international covenants.

Challenges to Religious Freedom in Multireligious Societies

A multireligious society presents several challenges:

  • Competing Truth Claims: Different religions often make mutually exclusive claims about ultimate reality, leading to potential conflict.
  • Moral Disagreements: Religious beliefs frequently inform moral codes, which can clash on issues like marriage, family, and social justice.
  • Potential for Discrimination: Minority religious groups may face discrimination from the dominant religion or societal norms.
  • Extremism and Violence: Radical interpretations of religious texts can fuel extremism and violence, threatening the religious freedom of others.
  • Secularism vs. Religious Identity: The role of the state – whether to remain neutral (secularism) or to favor certain religious traditions – is a constant source of debate.

Conditions for Possibility of Religious Freedom

Despite these challenges, religious freedom *is* possible in a multireligious society, but it requires specific conditions:

  • Constitutional Guarantees: A robust constitutional framework that explicitly protects religious freedom for all citizens, regardless of their beliefs. India’s Constitution, with Articles 25-28, provides such guarantees.
  • Rule of Law: An impartial legal system that enforces these guarantees and protects individuals from discrimination and persecution.
  • Political Neutrality of the State: The state should adopt a position of neutrality towards religion, avoiding preferential treatment of any particular faith. This is often referred to as secularism.
  • Interfaith Dialogue: Promoting dialogue and understanding between different religious communities can foster tolerance and reduce prejudice.
  • Education: Education that promotes critical thinking, empathy, and respect for diversity is crucial.
  • Civil Society Engagement: A vibrant civil society that advocates for religious freedom and monitors violations.

Philosophical Perspectives

John Locke’s concept of natural rights, including the right to freedom of conscience, provides a foundational argument for religious freedom. John Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness, particularly his principle of equal basic liberties, also supports the idea that religious freedom should be a fundamental right guaranteed to all citizens. However, Rawls also acknowledges the need for reasonable limitations on this freedom to ensure the safety and well-being of others.

Comparative Examples

Country Approach to Religious Freedom Challenges
India Constitutional guarantees (Articles 25-28), secularism Communal tensions, discrimination against minorities, debates over religious personal laws
United States First Amendment (Establishment Clause & Free Exercise Clause) Religious polarization, debates over the separation of church and state
France Laïcité (strict secularism) Tensions with Muslim communities over religious symbols, debates over integration

Conclusion

In conclusion, while a multireligious society presents inherent challenges to religious freedom, it is demonstrably possible to achieve it through a combination of robust constitutional protections, a commitment to the rule of law, state neutrality, and active promotion of interfaith dialogue and education. The success of this endeavor hinges on a shared understanding that religious freedom is not merely a right to believe, but a right to coexist peacefully and respectfully with those who hold different beliefs. Continuous vigilance and a commitment to inclusivity are essential to safeguard this fundamental freedom for all.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Secularism
Secularism, in the context of state-religion relations, refers to the principle of separation of government institutions from religious institutions and religious dignitaries. It aims to ensure equal treatment of all religions and non-religious beliefs by the state.
Pluralism
Pluralism is a political philosophy that advocates for the coexistence of diverse groups within a society, recognizing and valuing their differences. In the context of religion, it emphasizes the importance of respecting all faiths and beliefs.

Key Statistics

According to the Pew Research Center (2017), India has the largest Muslim population of any country in the world, exceeding 172 million, representing approximately 14.2% of the total population.

Source: Pew Research Center, "The Future of World Religions: Population Growth Projections 2010-2050"

As of 2011 Census of India, Hinduism is practiced by 79.8% of the population, Islam by 14.2%, Christianity by 2.3%, Sikhism by 1.7%, Buddhism by 0.7%, and Jainism by 0.4%.

Source: Census of India, 2011

Examples

The Shah Bano Case (1985)

The Shah Bano case in India highlighted the conflict between religious personal laws and constitutional rights. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Shah Bano, a divorced Muslim woman, granting her maintenance, but the ruling was later overturned by the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, demonstrating the complexities of balancing religious freedom with gender equality.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can religious freedom be limited if a religious practice harms others?

Yes. Religious freedom is not absolute. It can be legitimately limited when a religious practice directly harms the rights and freedoms of others, poses a threat to public safety, or violates fundamental principles of law and morality. These limitations must be narrowly tailored and proportionate to the harm.

Topics Covered

Political TheoryReligionReligious FreedomSecularismPluralism