UPSC MainsPSYCHOLOGY-PAPER-I202110 Marks150 Words
Q1.

What are the limits of intuition and common sense? Why do psychologists emphasize on scientific methods? Discuss.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the limitations of non-scientific ways of knowing and the rationale behind psychology’s emphasis on the scientific method. The answer should begin by defining intuition and common sense, outlining their inherent biases and limitations. Then, it should explain the core principles of the scientific method (empiricism, objectivity, falsifiability) and how these address the shortcomings of intuition and common sense. Examples illustrating the fallacies of intuitive beliefs are crucial. Structure: Define terms -> Limits of intuition/common sense -> Scientific method & its advantages -> Conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Intuition and common sense represent accumulated personal experiences and societal beliefs, often serving as quick, readily available guides to understanding the world. While seemingly practical, these modes of thought are susceptible to systematic errors and biases. Psychology, as a science, seeks to move beyond these limitations by employing rigorous, evidence-based methodologies. This emphasis stems from the recognition that human judgment, unaided by systematic investigation, can be profoundly flawed, leading to inaccurate conclusions about behavior and mental processes. Therefore, understanding the boundaries of intuition and common sense is fundamental to appreciating the value of the scientific approach in psychological inquiry.

Limits of Intuition and Common Sense

Intuition, often described as ‘knowing without knowing why,’ relies on gut feelings and subjective interpretations. Common sense, built upon shared cultural beliefs, appears logical but often lacks empirical support. Both are prone to several limitations:

  • Confirmation Bias: Individuals tend to seek out information confirming pre-existing beliefs, ignoring contradictory evidence. This reinforces inaccurate assumptions.
  • Hindsight Bias: The “I-knew-it-all-along” phenomenon, where events seem predictable after they’ve occurred, distorting our understanding of past judgments.
  • Availability Heuristic: Overestimating the likelihood of events that are easily recalled (e.g., dramatic news stories) while underestimating less publicized but more frequent occurrences.
  • Illusory Correlation: Perceiving a relationship between variables where none exists, often based on limited or biased observations.

For example, the common belief that ‘opposites attract’ in romantic relationships is often contradicted by research showing that people tend to choose partners with similar values and backgrounds. Similarly, intuition might lead someone to believe a particular therapy is effective based on anecdotal evidence, while controlled studies reveal no significant benefit.

Why Psychologists Emphasize Scientific Methods

The scientific method provides a systematic framework for overcoming the limitations of intuition and common sense. Its core principles include:

  • Empiricism: Relying on observable evidence rather than subjective opinions.
  • Objectivity: Minimizing researcher bias through standardized procedures and controls.
  • Skepticism: Questioning assumptions and demanding evidence before accepting claims.
  • Falsifiability: Formulating hypotheses that can be tested and potentially disproven.

Psychological research utilizes various scientific methods, including:

  • Experiments: Manipulating variables to determine cause-and-effect relationships.
  • Correlational Studies: Examining the relationship between variables without manipulation.
  • Surveys: Collecting data from large samples through questionnaires.
  • Case Studies: In-depth investigations of individual cases.

These methods employ statistical analysis to assess the significance of findings and minimize the risk of drawing erroneous conclusions. For instance, the development of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was rooted in rigorous experimental research demonstrating its effectiveness in treating various mental health conditions, unlike earlier approaches based on purely clinical observation.

Comparison: Intuition/Common Sense vs. Scientific Method

Feature Intuition/Common Sense Scientific Method
Basis Subjective experience, cultural beliefs Empirical evidence, systematic observation
Bias High susceptibility to biases Aims to minimize bias through controls
Accuracy Often inaccurate and unreliable Strives for accuracy and reliability
Falsifiability Difficult to test and disprove Hypotheses are designed to be falsifiable

Conclusion

In conclusion, while intuition and common sense offer convenient shortcuts to understanding, their inherent limitations – stemming from cognitive biases and lack of systematic verification – render them unreliable guides for psychological inquiry. The scientific method, with its emphasis on empiricism, objectivity, and falsifiability, provides a more robust and accurate approach to studying the complexities of the human mind and behavior. By embracing scientific principles, psychology strives to move beyond subjective beliefs and establish a foundation of knowledge grounded in evidence.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Heuristic
A mental shortcut that allows people to solve problems and make judgments quickly and efficiently, though may lead to errors.
Operational Definition
A specific, measurable definition of a construct or variable, allowing for its objective assessment in research. For example, defining 'aggression' as the number of times a child hits another child during a play session.

Key Statistics

A 2002 study by Tversky and Kahneman found that 80% of people overestimate their ability to predict future events.

Source: Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.

Research suggests that approximately 53% of published biomedical research is never replicated, raising concerns about the reliability of findings based solely on initial reports.

Source: Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(7), e124.

Examples

Placebo Effect

The placebo effect demonstrates the power of belief. Patients experiencing pain relief from a sugar pill (placebo) illustrates how expectations, rather than the treatment itself, can influence outcomes. This highlights the limitations of relying solely on subjective reports.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is intuition completely useless?

No, intuition can be valuable in certain situations, particularly when drawing on extensive experience in a specific domain. However, it should be treated with caution and ideally complemented by systematic analysis.

Topics Covered

PsychologyResearch MethodologyIntuitionScientific ApproachResearch Design