Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Language development is a uniquely human ability, sparking debate about its origins for centuries. Two dominant theoretical frameworks attempting to explain this process are the behavioristic and nativistic perspectives. Behaviorism, championed by figures like B.F. Skinner, posits that language is learned through environmental interactions and reinforcement. Conversely, nativism, most famously articulated by Noam Chomsky, argues that humans possess an innate capacity for language acquisition, a ‘language acquisition device’ (LAD). This essay will provide a comparative analysis of these two perspectives, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and contributions to our understanding of how children learn to speak.
Behavioristic Perspective
The behavioristic perspective, rooted in the principles of learning, views language acquisition as a form of habit formation. Key tenets include:
- Emphasis on Environment: Language is learned through imitation, reinforcement (rewards), and association. Children learn to speak by mimicking the language they hear and being rewarded for correct utterances.
- Operant Conditioning: Skinner (1957) argued that children are ‘shaped’ into speaking through differential reinforcement. Parents selectively reinforce approximations of correct speech, gradually leading to fluent language.
- Classical Conditioning: Associations between words and objects or events are formed through classical conditioning.
- Tabula Rasa: The mind is initially a ‘blank slate’ (tabula rasa) and all knowledge, including language, is acquired through experience.
Evidence supporting behaviorism: Early language development often involves imitation of simple words and phrases. Parental reinforcement, such as praise or providing desired objects, does seem to encourage language use.
Nativistic Perspective
In stark contrast, the nativistic perspective proposes that humans are born with an innate predisposition for language. Central ideas include:
- Language Acquisition Device (LAD): Chomsky (1965) proposed the existence of a LAD, a hypothetical module in the brain containing universal grammar – a set of principles common to all languages.
- Universal Grammar: This innate knowledge allows children to quickly and effortlessly acquire the grammatical rules of their native language, even with limited or imperfect input.
- Poverty of the Stimulus: Children are exposed to incomplete and often grammatically incorrect language (the ‘poverty of the stimulus’), yet they still develop complex grammatical competence.
- Critical Period: There is a critical period for language acquisition, typically before puberty, after which learning a language becomes significantly more difficult.
Evidence supporting nativism: Children acquire language rapidly and spontaneously, often producing sentences they have never heard before. The similarities in the stages of language development across different cultures suggest an underlying biological basis. Cases of ‘feral children’ (e.g., Genie) demonstrate the devastating effects of language deprivation during the critical period.
Comparative Analysis
The following table summarizes the key differences between the two perspectives:
| Feature | Behavioristic Perspective | Nativistic Perspective |
|---|---|---|
| Role of Environment | Primary; language is learned through interaction and reinforcement. | Secondary; environment triggers innate mechanisms, but doesn’t provide the fundamental knowledge. |
| Innate Abilities | Minimal; the mind is a blank slate. | Significant; humans possess an innate LAD and universal grammar. |
| Mechanism of Learning | Imitation, reinforcement, association. | Activation of innate mechanisms, parameter setting based on input. |
| Explanation for Creativity | Generalized learned responses; combining previously reinforced elements. | Application of universal grammar rules to novel situations. |
| Limitations | Cannot explain the speed and creativity of language acquisition; struggles with explaining grammatical competence. | Difficulty explaining how universal grammar is acquired and the role of social interaction. |
Modern Perspectives & Integration
Contemporary theories often integrate aspects of both behaviorism and nativism. Interactionist theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky, emphasize the interplay between innate abilities and environmental factors. Cognitive linguistics focuses on the role of general cognitive abilities, such as pattern recognition and categorization, in language acquisition. Furthermore, social interactionist theories highlight the importance of social interaction and communicative intent in driving language development.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the behavioristic and nativistic perspectives have contributed significantly to our understanding of language development. While behaviorism provides valuable insights into the role of environmental factors and reinforcement, it fails to fully account for the speed, creativity, and universality of language acquisition. Nativism, with its emphasis on innate abilities, offers a more compelling explanation for these phenomena, but struggles to explain the influence of social interaction and individual differences. Modern perspectives increasingly recognize the complex interplay between nature and nurture, acknowledging that language development is a dynamic process shaped by both biological predispositions and environmental influences.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.