Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The study of tribal populations in India has been a complex and often contested field. Early anthropological approaches were heavily influenced by colonial perspectives and later shaped by nationalist ideals. G.S. Ghurye and Verrier Elwin represent two distinct schools of thought regarding tribal communities. Ghurye advocated for the integration of tribes into the broader Indian society, viewing them as backward Hindus, while Elwin championed their unique cultural identity and argued for their isolation and protection. Understanding their contrasting views is crucial to comprehending the evolution of India’s tribal policy, which has shifted from assimilationist to protective and developmental approaches over time.
G.S. Ghurye’s Perspective
G.S. Ghurye, a prominent Indian sociologist, viewed tribal communities as an integral part of Indian society, essentially ‘backward Hindus’. His approach, outlined in his seminal work “The Scheduled Tribes and Their Problems” (1943), emphasized the need for their assimilation into the mainstream. Key aspects of his view include:
- Hinduization as a Process: Ghurye argued that tribal cultures were undergoing a process of Hinduization, adopting elements of Hindu religion and social structure.
- Integration over Isolation: He believed that isolating tribes would hinder their progress and advocated for their integration through education, economic development, and participation in national life.
- Rejection of Racial Theories: Ghurye refuted the prevalent racial classifications of tribes, asserting their common cultural roots with the rest of India.
- Focus on Social Reform: He emphasized the need for social reforms within tribal communities to address issues like superstition and harmful customs.
Verrier Elwin’s Perspective
Verrier Elwin, a British anthropologist who dedicated his life to studying Indian tribes, presented a contrasting viewpoint. He strongly advocated for the preservation of tribal cultures and their autonomy. His key arguments were:
- Unique Cultural Identity: Elwin emphasized the distinctiveness of tribal cultures, languages, and social organizations, arguing they were not simply backward versions of Hindu society.
- Advocacy for Isolation: He initially advocated for a policy of protective isolation, believing that contact with mainstream society would lead to the erosion of tribal cultures.
- Rejection of Assimilation: Elwin opposed forced assimilation, arguing it would be detrimental to tribal well-being and cultural survival.
- Emphasis on Self-Governance: He supported the idea of tribal self-governance and the protection of their traditional rights over land and resources.
Comparison of Ghurye and Elwin
| Feature | G.S. Ghurye | Verrier Elwin |
|---|---|---|
| View of Tribal Culture | Backward Hinduism | Distinct and Unique |
| Approach to Integration | Assimilation and Integration | Protective Isolation & Self-Governance |
| Focus | Social Reform & National Unity | Cultural Preservation & Tribal Rights |
| Impact of Contact | Positive, leading to progress | Potentially destructive to culture |
Government of India’s Policies Towards Tribal Populations
India’s policies towards tribal populations have evolved significantly since independence, reflecting a shift from assimilationist to protective and developmental approaches.
- Constitutional Provisions: Article 366(25) defines ‘Scheduled Tribes’. Articles 15, 16, 19, and 46 provide special provisions for their protection and development. The Fifth and Sixth Schedules deal with administration of Scheduled Areas and tribal areas in certain states respectively.
- Early Policies (1950-1980s): Initially, policies focused on welfare and development, aiming to bring tribes into the mainstream. This included providing education, healthcare, and economic opportunities.
- National Policy on Tribals (1983): This policy emphasized preservation of tribal cultures and identities while promoting their socio-economic development.
- Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006: A landmark legislation recognizing the rights of tribal communities over forest land and resources. It aimed to address historical injustices and empower tribal communities.
- Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA), 1996: This Act extended the provisions of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment to Scheduled Areas, empowering tribal communities to manage their own affairs through traditional institutions.
- Pradhan Mantri Van Dhan Yojana (2018): A scheme to improve livelihoods of tribal people through value addition of forest produce.
- Recent Developments: Focus on skill development, entrepreneurship, and infrastructure development in tribal areas. Initiatives like Eklavya Model Residential Schools (EMRS) aim to provide quality education to tribal students.
Conclusion
The contrasting perspectives of Ghurye and Elwin have profoundly influenced India’s approach to tribal populations. While Ghurye’s emphasis on integration resonated with the nation-building project, Elwin’s advocacy for cultural preservation highlighted the importance of respecting tribal identities and rights. The government’s policies have attempted to balance these competing concerns, evolving from assimilationist approaches to more protective and developmental strategies. However, challenges remain in ensuring equitable development, protecting tribal rights, and addressing the socio-economic disparities faced by these communities. A nuanced and culturally sensitive approach, informed by both integration and preservation, is crucial for fostering inclusive and sustainable development in tribal areas.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.