Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The Aggregate Supply (AS) curve represents the total quantity of goods and services that firms in an economy are willing to produce at a given price level. It is a fundamental component of the Aggregate Demand-Aggregate Supply (AD-AS) model, used to explain macroeconomic phenomena like inflation, unemployment, and economic growth. The shape and position of the AS curve differ significantly between the Classical and Keynesian schools of thought, reflecting their contrasting views on the functioning of markets, particularly the labor market. Understanding these differences is crucial for analyzing economic policies and predicting their effects. This answer will detail the shape of the AS curve in both models, highlighting the underlying assumptions that drive these differences.
The Classical Model and the Aggregate Supply Curve
The Classical economists, like Adam Smith and David Ricardo, believed in the self-regulating nature of markets. They assumed that wages and prices are perfectly flexible, adjusting quickly to changes in supply and demand. This flexibility is central to understanding the shape of the AS curve in the Classical model.
- Shape of the AS Curve: The AS curve in the Classical model is vertical at the level of full employment output (Yf). This implies that the economy always operates at its potential output level, regardless of the price level.
- Reasoning: Because wages and prices adjust instantaneously, any increase in aggregate demand (AD) will lead to an increase in prices but no change in real output. Workers will demand higher wages to compensate for the higher cost of living, and firms will pass these costs on to consumers in the form of higher prices.
- Role of Money: Classical economists viewed money as neutral – changes in the money supply only affect the price level, not real variables like output and employment.
- Equation: The Classical AS curve can be represented as: Y = Yf (where Y is real GDP and Yf is full employment GDP).
The Keynesian Model and the Aggregate Supply Curve
Keynesian economics, developed by John Maynard Keynes in response to the Great Depression, challenged the Classical assumptions. Keynes argued that wages and prices are ‘sticky’ – they do not adjust quickly to changes in demand, especially downwards. This stickiness is a key feature of the Keynesian AS curve.
- Shape of the AS Curve: The AS curve in the Keynesian model is initially relatively flat (elastic) at low levels of output and gradually becomes steeper (inelastic) as the economy approaches full employment. This creates a short-run AS (SRAS) curve.
- Reasoning: At low levels of output, there is significant unused capacity in the economy, and firms are willing to increase output in response to even small increases in AD. However, as output approaches full employment, firms face capacity constraints and labor shortages, leading to higher costs and requiring larger price increases to induce further output increases.
- Role of Wages: Keynes emphasized the role of nominal wage rigidity. Labor contracts, minimum wage laws, and social norms prevent wages from falling easily, even during recessions.
- Long-Run AS Curve: In the long run, Keynesians also acknowledge a vertical AS curve at the full employment level of output, similar to the Classical model. However, the short-run AS curve is the focus of Keynesian analysis.
Comparison of Classical and Keynesian AS Curves
The following table summarizes the key differences between the Classical and Keynesian AS curves:
| Feature | Classical Model | Keynesian Model (Short-Run) |
|---|---|---|
| Shape of AS Curve | Vertical | Initially flat, then steeper |
| Wage & Price Flexibility | Perfectly Flexible | Sticky (especially downwards) |
| Impact of AD Increase | Price Increase Only | Output & Price Increase |
| Role of Government | Minimal Intervention | Active Intervention to Stabilize Demand |
| Focus | Long-Run Equilibrium | Short-Run Fluctuations |
The differing shapes of the AS curves have significant implications for macroeconomic policy. In the Classical model, government intervention is unnecessary as the economy will self-correct to full employment. However, in the Keynesian model, government intervention through fiscal and monetary policy is crucial to stimulate AD and move the economy towards full employment during recessions.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the shape of the aggregate supply curve fundamentally differs between the Classical and Keynesian models due to contrasting assumptions about wage and price flexibility. The Classical model posits a vertical AS curve reflecting instantaneous adjustments, while the Keynesian model features a short-run AS curve that is initially flat and then becomes steeper, reflecting wage and price stickiness. These differences have profound implications for understanding macroeconomic fluctuations and the role of government intervention in stabilizing the economy. Modern macroeconomic thought often integrates elements of both schools, recognizing the importance of both long-run potential and short-run fluctuations.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.