Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The Indian administrative and corporate landscape is increasingly scrutinized for ethical lapses, impacting public trust and organizational integrity. The case of Prabhat highlights a complex situation where professional pressures, personal vulnerabilities, and a tempting offer create a significant ethical dilemma. This scenario underscores the importance of upholding ethical standards even in the face of adversity, and the potential consequences of compromising one’s integrity. The question demands a thorough examination of the ethical principles involved and a reasoned course of action for Prabhat, considering his responsibilities to his company, himself, and society.
Identifying the Ethical Dilemmas
Prabhat faces a multitude of interconnected ethical dilemmas:
- Conflict of Interest: Subhash Verma’s offer creates a clear conflict of interest. Accepting the information would benefit Sterling Electric Ltd. unfairly, compromising the integrity of the tendering process.
- Compromising Integrity: Accepting stolen information is inherently unethical and violates principles of honesty and fair competition.
- Pressure vs. Principles: Prabhat is under immense pressure from his superiors and facing personal financial difficulties. However, these pressures do not justify unethical behavior.
- Duty to Stakeholders: Prabhat has a duty to his company, his family, and the broader public. Choosing between these competing interests requires careful consideration.
Applying Ethical Frameworks
Utilitarianism
A utilitarian approach would assess the consequences of each action. Accepting the information might benefit Sterling Electric Ltd. and Prabhat’s family in the short term, but it could harm Unique Electronics Ltd., erode trust in the tendering process, and potentially lead to legal repercussions for the company and Prabhat. The long-term negative consequences likely outweigh the short-term gains.
Deontology (Duty Ethics)
Deontology emphasizes moral duties and rules. Regardless of the consequences, stealing and using confidential information is inherently wrong. Prabhat has a duty to act with honesty and integrity, and to uphold the principles of fair competition. This framework strongly suggests rejecting Subhash Verma’s offer.
Virtue Ethics
Virtue ethics focuses on character traits. A virtuous person would demonstrate qualities like honesty, integrity, fairness, and courage. Accepting the offer would be inconsistent with these virtues, while rejecting it would demonstrate moral strength and commitment to ethical principles.
Stakeholder Analysis
| Stakeholder | Interests | Impact of Prabhat’s Decision |
|---|---|---|
| Sterling Electric Ltd. | Securing the contract, improving financial performance | Positive (if he accepts), Negative (if he rejects - potential loss of contract, but maintains ethical standing) |
| Unique Electronics Ltd. | Fair competition, winning the contract based on merit | Negative (if he accepts), Positive (if he rejects) |
| Prabhat | Job security, financial stability, professional reputation | Short-term positive (if he accepts), Long-term negative (risk of legal repercussions, damage to reputation). Positive in the long run if he rejects (maintains integrity) |
| Prabhat’s Family | Financial security, well-being | Short-term positive (if he accepts), Potential long-term negative (if scandal erupts). |
| Ministry of Defence | Fair and transparent procurement process | Negative (if he accepts), Positive (if he rejects) |
Recommended Course of Action
Prabhat should reject Subhash Verma’s offer unequivocally. He should immediately report the incident to his Executive Director (India Head) and potentially to a higher authority within the company, providing all details regarding the offer and Subhash Verma’s possession of confidential documents. He should also consider informing the relevant authorities within the Ministry of Defence about the attempted breach of confidentiality.
Furthermore, Prabhat should proactively seek guidance from his company’s legal counsel regarding the appropriate course of action and potential legal ramifications. While facing personal and professional pressures, upholding ethical principles is paramount. He should explore legitimate avenues to address his financial difficulties, such as seeking financial counseling or exploring alternative employment options if his position is genuinely at risk.
Conclusion
Prabhat’s situation presents a stark reminder that ethical dilemmas often arise in complex circumstances. While the temptation to compromise one’s principles may be strong, particularly when facing personal and professional pressures, maintaining integrity is crucial for long-term success and societal well-being. By rejecting the unethical offer, reporting the incident, and seeking legitimate solutions to his challenges, Prabhat can demonstrate strong ethical leadership and uphold the values of honesty, fairness, and accountability. This approach, though potentially difficult in the short term, will ultimately safeguard his reputation and contribute to a more ethical corporate and public environment.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.