Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Ethical dilemmas are inherent in public service, demanding careful consideration of competing values and principles. A civil servant often finds themselves navigating situations where personal integrity clashes with external pressures, particularly from those in positions of power. The core of ethical governance lies in upholding the rule of law, maintaining transparency, and acting in the public interest. This response addresses the options available to a civil servant facing undue influence, assuming the 'given situation' involves a request to favour a relative of a politically influential person, violating established procedures and principles of meritocracy.
Understanding the Situation and Stakeholders
The primary stakeholders in this scenario are the civil servant, the politically influential person, the relative seeking favour, the public, and the integrity of the institution. The core issue revolves around potential abuse of power, nepotism, and violation of principles of fairness and equal opportunity. The civil servant’s duty is to act impartially and in accordance with the law, irrespective of external pressures.
Options Available
- Compliance with the Request: Favouring the relative by bending the rules.
- Negotiation/Compromise: Attempting to find a middle ground that partially satisfies the request while minimizing the violation of rules.
- Firm Refusal: Clearly and respectfully refusing the request, citing rules and regulations.
- Reporting the Matter: Informing higher authorities (e.g., Vigilance Commission, Chief Secretary) about the undue influence attempt.
- Seeking Guidance: Consulting with senior colleagues or ethical advisors within the organization.
Analysis of Options
| Option | Pros | Cons | Ethicality | Legality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compliance | May temporarily appease the influential person. | Compromises integrity, fosters corruption, harms public trust, sets a bad precedent. | Highly unethical | Illegal (violation of service rules, potential for criminal charges) |
| Negotiation | May reduce the extent of rule-bending. | Still compromises integrity, creates ambiguity, may be perceived as collusion. | Questionable | Potentially illegal, depending on the extent of compromise |
| Firm Refusal | Upholds integrity, demonstrates commitment to ethical principles, protects the institution’s reputation. | May lead to adverse consequences from the influential person (e.g., transfer, harassment). | Highly ethical | Legal |
| Reporting | Ensures accountability, protects the institution, potentially prevents further wrongdoing. | May face retaliation, requires courage and strong evidence. | Highly ethical | Legal (often mandated by rules) |
| Seeking Guidance | Provides support and clarity, helps in making an informed decision. | May delay action, relies on the availability and integrity of advisors. | Ethical | Legal |
Recommended Course of Action
The most ethical and legally sound course of action is a firm refusal coupled with reporting the matter to higher authorities. The civil servant should politely but firmly explain to the influential person that complying with the request would violate established rules and principles of fairness. Simultaneously, a detailed report should be submitted to the appropriate authority (e.g., Vigilance Commission) outlining the attempt at undue influence. Seeking guidance from senior colleagues beforehand is also advisable.
Relevant Legal and Institutional Frameworks
- Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964: These rules emphasize integrity, impartiality, and devotion to duty.
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: Addresses bribery and corruption in public service.
- Whistleblower Protection Act, 2014: Provides protection to individuals reporting corruption.
- CVC (Central Vigilance Commission): An independent body responsible for overseeing integrity in government.
Conclusion
Navigating ethical dilemmas requires courage, integrity, and a commitment to upholding the rule of law. While facing pressure from powerful individuals can be daunting, a civil servant’s primary duty is to the public and the institution they serve. A firm refusal, coupled with reporting the incident, not only protects the integrity of the system but also reinforces the principles of good governance and accountability. Strengthening ethical infrastructure and promoting a culture of transparency within the bureaucracy are crucial for preventing such situations in the future.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.