UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-IV202210 Marks150 Words
Q5.

“Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have the right to do and what is right to do." -Potter Stewart

How to Approach

This question demands a philosophical yet practical answer. The approach should be to first unpack the quote, highlighting the distinction between legal permissibility and moral rightness. Then, illustrate this difference with real-world examples, emphasizing the role of ethics in guiding conduct beyond mere adherence to the law. The answer should demonstrate an understanding of ethical frameworks and their application in decision-making. Structure: Introduction defining the quote, Body with examples and ethical principles, and Conclusion emphasizing the importance of ethical conduct.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The quote by Potter Stewart, “Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have the right to do and what is right to do,” encapsulates a fundamental tension in human conduct. While law defines the boundaries of permissible action, ethics delves into the realm of moral principles that dictate what *should* be done. Often, an action can be legally permissible but ethically questionable, creating a moral dilemma. This distinction is crucial for individuals and societies striving for justice, fairness, and integrity. The quote highlights the need for a robust ethical compass that transcends legal constraints, guiding us towards responsible and virtuous behavior.

Understanding the Dichotomy

The core of Stewart’s statement lies in recognizing that legality and morality are not synonymous. Law represents a societal consensus on acceptable behavior, often enforced through sanctions. However, ethics, rooted in values, principles, and conscience, provides a broader framework for evaluating actions. What is legally permissible may not always align with what is morally right, and vice versa.

Illustrative Examples

Numerous examples demonstrate this divergence:

  • Tax Avoidance vs. Tax Evasion: While legal tax avoidance strategies minimize tax liability within the law, aggressive avoidance schemes can be ethically questionable, depriving the state of resources for public welfare. Tax evasion, however, is illegal and unethical.
  • Whistleblowing: A whistleblower revealing corporate misconduct may be violating confidentiality agreements (potentially legally problematic), but their actions are often ethically justified in the interest of public safety and accountability. The 2013 Edward Snowden revelations exemplify this dilemma.
  • Lobbying: Lobbying is legally permitted, allowing interest groups to influence policy. However, undue influence through financial contributions or other means can be ethically problematic, potentially undermining democratic processes.
  • Insider Trading: While sometimes difficult to prosecute, exploiting non-public information for personal gain is widely considered unethical, even if technically legal in certain grey areas.

Ethical Frameworks and Decision-Making

Several ethical frameworks help navigate this distinction:

  • Utilitarianism: Focuses on maximizing overall happiness. An action might be legally permissible but unethical if it causes significant harm to a larger group.
  • Deontology: Emphasizes moral duties and rules. Certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of their consequences.
  • Virtue Ethics: Centers on developing virtuous character traits like honesty, compassion, and fairness.

The Role of Conscience and Social Responsibility

Ultimately, discerning the difference between ‘right’ and ‘permitted’ often relies on individual conscience and a sense of social responsibility. A strong ethical foundation encourages individuals to prioritize moral principles even when faced with legal loopholes or societal pressures. The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, while a legal framework, relies heavily on the ethical conduct of public servants.

Challenges in a Complex World

Globalization and technological advancements present new ethical challenges. For example, data privacy concerns arise from the legal but potentially intrusive collection and use of personal information by tech companies. The ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its potential biases are also increasingly debated.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Potter Stewart’s quote serves as a potent reminder that ethical conduct extends beyond mere legal compliance. A truly ethical individual possesses the discernment to recognize when an action, though legally permissible, falls short of moral rightness. Cultivating a strong ethical compass, informed by principles like justice, fairness, and compassion, is essential for building a just and equitable society. Promoting ethical awareness and education, alongside robust legal frameworks, is crucial for navigating the complexities of the modern world and fostering responsible citizenship.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Ethics
Moral principles that govern a person's behavior or the conducting of an activity. It deals with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation.
Moral Dilemma
A situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between two or more options, none of which is entirely satisfactory. Often involves a conflict between ethical principles.

Key Statistics

According to Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index 2023, India ranked 93 out of 180 countries, indicating a persistent challenge with ethical governance.

Source: Transparency International (2023)

A 2022 survey by the Association for Corporate Social Responsibility in India (ACSRI) found that 68% of Indian companies prioritize ethical conduct in their business operations.

Source: ACSRI (2022)

Examples

The Enron Scandal

The Enron scandal (early 2000s) involved widespread accounting fraud that was technically legal for a period due to loopholes, but was deeply unethical, leading to the company’s collapse and significant financial losses for investors and employees.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it always necessary to follow the law?

While generally, adherence to the law is crucial for societal order, there are exceptional circumstances – such as civil disobedience – where individuals may ethically choose to break unjust laws, accepting the legal consequences for a higher moral purpose. However, this is a complex issue with significant debate.