UPSC MainsANI-HUSB-VETER-SCIENCE-PAPER-I202310 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q5.

Describe the different covariance components for resemblance between animal relatives.

How to Approach

This question requires a clear understanding of animal genetics and breeding principles. The approach should be to first define covariance components and then systematically describe each component – additive, dominance, and epistatic – explaining their contribution to resemblance between relatives. A tabular format would be useful for concisely presenting the key features of each component. Focus on clarity and precision in defining each term, linking it to the observed phenotypic resemblance.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Animal breeding relies heavily on understanding the genetic basis of traits. The resemblance between relatives – whether siblings, parent-offspring, or grandparent-grandchild – is a consequence of shared genes. This resemblance isn't solely due to additive gene effects; it’s a complex interplay of various genetic components. Covariance components, therefore, are statistical measures that quantify the relative contributions of these genetic factors to the phenotypic resemblance. Understanding these components is crucial for effective breeding programs aimed at improving livestock productivity and disease resistance, as it informs selection strategies and prediction of genetic merit.

Covariance Components and Resemblance in Animal Relatives

Covariance components are statistical parameters used in quantitative genetics to partition the total genetic variance into different components contributing to the phenotypic resemblance between relatives. These components explain the extent to which relatives resemble each other due to different genetic mechanisms. The primary covariance components are:

1. Additive Covariance (A)

Additive genetic variance is the most important component for breeding. It represents the effect of genes that have the same effect in all individuals. The resemblance due to additive genetic effects is predictable and consistent across generations. Selection based on additive genetic variance is the cornerstone of most animal breeding programs.

  • Definition: Additive genetic variance represents the variance in phenotypes due to the combined effects of alleles that have identical effects regardless of the genetic background.
  • Resemblance: Parent-offspring and sibling resemblance are primarily due to additive genetic effects.
  • Example: In dairy cattle, milk yield is influenced by numerous genes, each contributing a small additive effect. Selecting bulls with high milk yield will increase the milk yield in their progeny primarily due to the transmission of these additive alleles.

2. Dominance Covariance (D)

Dominance variance arises from interactions between alleles at the *same* locus. It's less predictable than additive variance because the phenotypic expression depends on the genotype. Dominance effects are often transient and less heritable.

  • Definition: Dominance variance is the variance in phenotypes due to interactions between alleles at the same locus, where one allele masks the effect of another.
  • Resemblance: Dominance effects contribute to resemblance between relatives, but are generally less consistent than additive effects. Parent-offspring resemblance can be affected by dominance.
  • Statistic: Dominance variance is typically smaller than additive variance, often representing only 5-15% of the total genetic variance (knowledge cutoff).

3. Epistatic Covariance (I)

Epistasis involves interactions between alleles at *different* loci. It’s the most complex component and difficult to predict. Epistatic interactions can significantly alter the phenotypic expression of genes and often result in non-linear responses to selection.

  • Definition: Epistatic variance arises from the interactions between genes at different loci, where the effect of one gene depends on the alleles present at another locus.
  • Resemblance: Epistasis contributes to resemblance, but its impact is often masked by additive and dominance effects.
  • Example: Coat color in horses is often influenced by epistatic interactions between multiple genes. The phenotypic expression of a particular gene (e.g., for black pigment) might be masked or modified by the presence of alleles at a different locus.
Covariance Component Definition Resemblance Predictability
Additive (A) Combined effects of alleles with identical effects Parent-offspring, sibling High
Dominance (D) Interactions between alleles at the same locus Parent-offspring (variable) Moderate
Epistatic (I) Interactions between alleles at different loci Complex, often masked Low

Importance in Breeding Programs

Understanding covariance components is crucial for:

  • Genetic Evaluation: Precisely estimating the breeding value of animals.
  • Selection Strategies: Designing effective selection schemes to improve desired traits.
  • Predicting Response to Selection: Forecasting the genetic progress in future generations.

The National Livestock Productivity Organisation (NLPO) in India utilizes quantitative genetics principles, including covariance component estimation, to improve livestock productivity through selective breeding programs. (Scheme - Knowledge Cutoff)

Improving Disease Resistance in Poultry A poultry breeding program aims to improve resistance to avian influenza. Geneticists estimate the covariance components contributing to disease resistance, finding that additive genetic variance is significant. Selection based on additive genetic effects, combined with strategies to manage dominance and epistatic interactions, leads to a significant reduction in disease incidence in the selected lines. Improved disease resistance and reduced economic losses for poultry farmers.

Conclusion

In conclusion, covariance components – additive, dominance, and epistatic – are fundamental to understanding the genetic basis of resemblance between animal relatives. While additive variance forms the bedrock of most breeding programs due to its predictability and heritability, dominance and epistatic effects also contribute significantly. Accurate estimation of these components is vital for designing effective breeding strategies that enhance livestock productivity and adaptability, leading to sustainable improvements in animal agriculture. Further research focusing on unraveling the complexities of epistatic interactions remains crucial for maximizing genetic gain.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Quantitative Genetics
A branch of genetics that deals with traits that vary continuously (e.g., height, weight, milk yield) and are influenced by multiple genes and environmental factors.
Heritability (h<sup>2</sup>)
The proportion of phenotypic variation in a population that is attributable to genetic variation.

Key Statistics

The heritability (h<sup>2</sup>) of a trait, which represents the proportion of phenotypic variance attributable to genetic variance, typically ranges from 0 to 1.

Source: Knowledge Cutoff

The average heritability of economically important traits in livestock typically ranges between 0.2 and 0.5 (Knowledge Cutoff).

Source: Knowledge Cutoff

Examples

Dairy Cattle Milk Yield

Selection for higher milk yield in dairy cattle has primarily relied on the additive genetic variance for this trait. Bulls with higher milk yield records are selected to breed with cows, gradually increasing the average milk yield in the population.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are epistatic effects difficult to manage in breeding programs?

Epistatic interactions are complex and involve multiple genes, making it challenging to predict their effects and incorporate them into selection strategies. They often lead to unpredictable responses to selection.

Topics Covered

Animal GeneticsAnimal BreedingCovarianceHeritabilityGenetic Relationships