UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-I202310 Marks150 Words
Q18.

Explain how modified HDI is an improved measure of development over HDI.

How to Approach

This question requires a comparative analysis of the Human Development Index (HDI) and the Modified Human Development Index (MHDI). The answer should begin by defining both indices, highlighting the limitations of the traditional HDI, and then elaborating on how the MHDI addresses those limitations by incorporating inequality. A structured approach comparing the methodologies and implications of both indices is crucial. Focus on the concept of 'inequality adjusted HDI' and its significance in providing a more nuanced picture of development.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Human Development Index (HDI), introduced by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in 1990, revolutionized development measurement by moving beyond purely economic indicators like GDP. However, the HDI presents an average picture, masking disparities within a nation. Recognizing this limitation, the Modified HDI, also known as the Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI), was developed. The IHDI seeks to provide a more accurate reflection of a country’s development level by factoring in inequalities in health, education, and income. This answer will explain how the MHDI represents an improvement over the traditional HDI, offering a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of human development.

Understanding the HDI and MHDI

The HDI is a composite statistic of life expectancy, education (mean and expected years of schooling), and per capita income indicators, which are used to rank countries into four tiers of human development. It provides a single value between 0 and 1, where higher values indicate greater development. However, the HDI treats all citizens as equal, ignoring internal inequalities.

The MHDI (or IHDI), on the other hand, adjusts the HDI by incorporating a geometric mean of the dimensions, weighted by inequality in each dimension. This geometric mean penalizes countries with high inequality, resulting in a lower IHDI value compared to the HDI. The MHDI essentially shows the ‘average’ level of human development attained by people in a society, accounting for inequalities.

Methodological Differences

The key difference lies in the methodology. The HDI uses a simple average of the dimension indices, while the MHDI employs a geometric mean. The geometric mean is more sensitive to inequalities because it gives less weight to high values and more weight to low values. This is mathematically represented as:

IHDI = (HDI * (1 - Inequality in Health) * (1 - Inequality in Education) * (1 - Inequality in Income))1/3

Addressing the Limitations of HDI

  • Revealing True Development Levels: The MHDI often reveals a significant gap between a country’s HDI and its IHDI. This gap, known as the ‘inequality penalty’, indicates the extent to which inequalities are hindering overall human development. For example, a country might have a high HDI due to high average income, but a significantly lower IHDI if that income is concentrated in the hands of a few.
  • Policy Implications: The MHDI provides policymakers with a more accurate picture of the challenges facing their populations. It highlights the need for policies that address inequalities in access to healthcare, education, and economic opportunities.
  • Better Comparison: The MHDI allows for a more meaningful comparison of development levels across countries, as it accounts for the distribution of well-being within each nation.

Illustrative Example: India

According to the 2021 Human Development Report, India’s HDI value was 0.633, placing it in the medium human development category. However, its IHDI value was 0.527, a significant drop due to inequalities. This indicates that the average level of human development experienced by Indians is considerably lower than what the HDI suggests. The inequality penalty for India was 0.235, one of the highest in the world.

Indicator India (2021)
HDI 0.633
IHDI 0.527
Inequality Penalty 0.235

Limitations of MHDI

While an improvement, the MHDI isn’t perfect. It relies on data availability and quality, which can be a challenge in developing countries. Furthermore, it only considers inequalities in three dimensions and doesn’t capture other forms of inequality, such as gender or regional disparities.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Modified HDI represents a significant advancement over the traditional HDI by incorporating inequality into the measurement of human development. By providing a more nuanced and accurate picture of well-being, the MHDI empowers policymakers to design targeted interventions that address disparities and promote inclusive growth. While not without its limitations, the MHDI serves as a crucial tool for understanding and advancing human development globally, moving beyond simple averages to reflect the lived realities of all citizens.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Human Development Index (HDI)
A summary composite index measuring a country’s average achievements in three basic dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, being knowledgeable and having a decent standard of living.
Inequality Penalty
The difference between a country’s HDI and its IHDI. It represents the percentage loss in human development due to inequalities in health, education, and income.

Key Statistics

In 2021, Switzerland had the highest HDI (0.962) and the highest IHDI (0.955), indicating relatively low inequality. Niger had the lowest HDI (0.400) and a substantial gap between its HDI and IHDI.

Source: UNDP Human Development Report 2021/2022

Globally, the average inequality penalty was 20.9% in 2021, meaning that on average, countries are losing 20.9% of their human development potential due to inequalities.

Source: UNDP Human Development Report 2021/2022

Examples

Norway vs. United States

Norway consistently ranks high on both HDI and IHDI, demonstrating a strong commitment to equitable development. The United States, while having a high HDI, often experiences a larger gap between its HDI and IHDI due to significant income inequality.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a lower IHDI always mean a country is ‘worse’ than another?

Not necessarily. A lower IHDI indicates greater inequality, but it doesn't automatically mean a country is failing in human development. It simply highlights the need to address disparities and ensure that the benefits of development are shared more equitably.

Topics Covered

EconomicsDevelopment EconomicsDevelopment IndicatorsPovertyInequality