Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
In the context of the Civil Services Examination, questions are designed to test a candidate’s analytical abilities, understanding of concepts, and ability to structure a coherent response. The question presented, simply stating “Negative,” lacks any context, subject matter, or directive verb. It is therefore an incomplete and invalid question, rendering a substantive answer impossible. A responsible candidate must recognize this deficiency and articulate the reasons why a meaningful response cannot be formulated.
Understanding the Question’s Deficiencies
The question “Negative” fails to meet the basic criteria of a valid UPSC Mains question. It lacks:
- Subject Matter: There is no indication of the discipline (Polity, Economy, Geography, etc.) to which the question pertains.
- Directive Verb: UPSC questions typically begin with a directive verb (e.g., “Discuss,” “Analyze,” “Evaluate,” “Comment”). The absence of such a verb leaves the expected response entirely undefined.
- Context: The question provides no background information or scenario to frame a potential answer.
Why a Response is Inappropriate
Attempting to answer such a question would be speculative and demonstrate a lack of critical thinking. A candidate might arbitrarily choose a topic and discuss its negative aspects, but this would not be a response *to the question* but rather a self-generated essay. This approach would be penalized by the examiner.
Principles of Effective Question Answering
A successful UPSC answer requires:
- Understanding the Demand of the Question: Identifying the precise topic and the type of response expected.
- Content Relevance: Providing information directly related to the question.
- Structured Presentation: Organizing the answer logically with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.
The question “Negative” prevents the fulfillment of all these principles.
Illustrative Example of an Incorrect Approach
For instance, attempting to answer this question by discussing the negative impacts of climate change would be a misinterpretation. While climate change has negative impacts, the question does not specify climate change as the topic. Similarly, discussing negative aspects of globalization, or negative consequences of a particular policy, would be equally irrelevant.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the question “Negative” is fundamentally flawed due to its lack of context, subject matter, and directive verb. A responsible and strategically sound approach is to acknowledge its invalidity and demonstrate an understanding of the principles of effective question answering, rather than attempting to construct an arbitrary response. This showcases analytical skills and a critical understanding of the examination process.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.