Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Coordination number, in the context of crystal structures, refers to the number of ions surrounding a given ion in a crystal lattice. This arrangement is fundamentally governed by the principles of minimizing energy, achieved through efficient packing of ions. A crucial factor influencing this packing is the ratio of ionic radii of the cation and anion. The radius ratio rule, proposed by Goldschmidt, provides a quantitative relationship between the radius ratio and the coordination number, dictating the most stable geometric arrangement. Understanding this relationship is vital for predicting and interpreting crystal structures.
The Radius Ratio Rule and Coordination Number
The radius ratio (r+/r-), where r+ is the radius of the cation and r- is the radius of the anion, determines the coordination number. Different radius ratios favor different coordination geometries to maximize stability. The rule is based on the idea that ions will arrange themselves to maximize electrostatic attraction and minimize repulsion.
Coordination Number 4 (Tetrahedral)
When the radius ratio falls between 0.225 and 0.414, a tetrahedral coordination is favored. In this arrangement, the cation occupies the center of a tetrahedron formed by four anions. An example is ZnS (Zinc Sulfide). The small cation fits comfortably within the anion framework, minimizing repulsion.
Coordination Number 6 (Octahedral)
A radius ratio between 0.414 and 0.732 leads to octahedral coordination. Here, the cation is at the center of an octahedron formed by six anions. NaCl (Sodium Chloride) is a classic example. The larger cation can be accommodated by six anions without significant distortion of the structure.
Coordination Number 8 (Cubic)
When the radius ratio exceeds 0.732, cubic coordination is observed. The cation is surrounded by eight anions arranged at the corners of a cube. CsCl (Cesium Chloride) exemplifies this arrangement. The relatively large cation requires eight anions for stable coordination.
The following table summarizes the relationship:
| Coordination Number | Radius Ratio (r+/r-) | Geometry | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.225 – 0.414 | Tetrahedral | ZnS |
| 6 | 0.414 – 0.732 | Octahedral | NaCl |
| 8 | > 0.732 | Cubic | CsCl |
Limitations of the Radius Ratio Rule
While the radius ratio rule is a useful guideline, it has limitations. It assumes ions are perfectly spherical and ignores factors like polarization effects, covalent character, and the presence of lone pair electrons. For instance, some compounds deviate from the predicted coordination numbers due to these factors. Furthermore, the rule doesn't account for the influence of higher coordination numbers (9, 12, etc.) which can occur in larger ionic systems.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the coordination number in a crystal is strongly dependent on the ratio of ionic radii, as described by the radius ratio rule. This rule provides a valuable framework for predicting crystal structures based on ionic size. However, it's crucial to remember that it's a simplification and other factors can influence the actual coordination environment. A comprehensive understanding of crystal chemistry requires considering these limitations alongside the fundamental principles of ionic packing.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.