UPSC MainsHISTORY-PAPER-I202320 Marks
Q18.

The Marathas posed a significant threat to the integrity of the Mughal Empire. Discuss.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the Maratha-Mughal conflict spanning the 17th and 18th centuries. The answer should move beyond simply stating military clashes and delve into the political, economic, and social factors that contributed to the Marathas becoming a significant threat. Structure the answer chronologically, highlighting key phases of the conflict, Maratha strategies, Mughal weaknesses, and the eventual impact on the empire’s integrity. Focus on how Maratha raids disrupted Mughal finances, administration, and authority.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Mughal Empire, at its zenith under Aurangzeb, faced a formidable challenge from the rising Maratha power in the Deccan. Initially perceived as a regional disturbance, the Marathas, under the leadership of Shivaji Maharaj and his successors, evolved into a potent force capable of not only resisting Mughal expansion but also actively dismantling the empire’s authority. This challenge wasn’t merely military; it was a systemic threat to the Mughal political, economic, and administrative structures. The Marathas’ guerilla warfare tactics, coupled with their ambition for Swarajya (self-rule), fundamentally altered the power dynamics of 18th-century India, ultimately contributing to the decline of Mughal dominance.

Early Resistance and the Foundation of Maratha Power (1660s-1680s)

The initial clashes between the Marathas and Mughals began during the reign of Shah Jahan and intensified under Aurangzeb. Shivaji Maharaj, recognizing the vulnerabilities of the Mughal system, pioneered guerilla warfare (Ganimi Kawa) in the rugged terrain of the Western Ghats. He skillfully utilized forts (Qilla) for defense and launched swift raids on Mughal territories, targeting revenue collection centers and trade routes. The Treaty of Purandar (1665) marked a temporary truce, but Aurangzeb’s attempts to enforce Mughal dominance through the appointment of his son, Muazzam, as Viceroy of the Deccan, reignited the conflict.

Aurangzeb’s Deccan Campaigns and Maratha Consolidation (1680s-1707)

Aurangzeb’s prolonged and ultimately unsuccessful Deccan campaigns (1682-1707) were pivotal in weakening the Mughal Empire. He became increasingly preoccupied with suppressing the Marathas, diverting resources and manpower from other crucial areas. The Marathas, under Sambhaji and Rajaram, continued their resistance, even after Shivaji’s death in 1680. Aurangzeb’s policies, including the imposition of Jizya and forced conversions, alienated the local population and fueled Maratha resistance. The Marathas effectively exploited the logistical challenges faced by the Mughal army in the Deccan, launching raids and disrupting supply lines.

The Rise of the Peshwas and Maratha Expansion (1707-1761)

Following Aurangzeb’s death in 1707, the Mughal Empire entered a period of rapid decline. The Marathas, under the leadership of the Peshwas (prime ministers), transformed from a regional power into a pan-Indian force. Balaji Vishwanath and Baji Rao I spearheaded this expansion, securing Mughal recognition of Maratha rights to collect Chauth (one-third of the revenue) and Sardeshmukhi (one-tenth of the revenue) from the Deccan provinces. This effectively gave the Marathas control over a significant portion of Mughal revenue.

Maratha Confederacy and its Impact

The Maratha Confederacy, comprising five prominent families – Peshwas, Gaekwads, Holkars, Scindias, and Bhonsles – further consolidated Maratha power. They launched expeditions into Malwa, Gujarat, and even North India, plundering cities and challenging Mughal authority. The sack of Delhi in 1737 by Sadashivrao Bhau demonstrated the extent of Maratha influence and the vulnerability of the Mughal capital. The Marathas became kingmakers, influencing Mughal politics and installing puppet rulers.

The Third Battle of Panipat (1761) and its Aftermath

The Third Battle of Panipat (1761), fought between the Marathas and Ahmad Shah Abdali’s Afghan army, was a turning point. Although a devastating defeat for the Marathas, it did not completely destroy their power. The battle weakened both sides, creating a power vacuum that facilitated the rise of other regional powers, including the British East India Company. The Maratha Confederacy fragmented, and internal conflicts weakened their ability to effectively challenge British expansion.

Phase Key Leaders Maratha Strategy Mughal Response Impact on Mughal Integrity
Early Resistance (1660s-1680s) Shivaji Maharaj Guerilla Warfare, Fortification Military Campaigns, Treaties Limited disruption, established Maratha identity
Deccan Campaigns (1680s-1707) Sambhaji, Rajaram Prolonged Resistance, Raids Prolonged Campaigns, Resource Drain Significant resource depletion, weakened central authority
Peshwa Leadership (1707-1761) Balaji Vishwanath, Baji Rao I, Sadashivrao Bhau Expansion, Chauth & Sardeshmukhi Collection Weakened Response, Puppet Rulers Loss of revenue control, political interference, erosion of prestige

Conclusion

The Marathas undeniably posed a significant and escalating threat to the integrity of the Mughal Empire. Their persistent resistance, innovative military tactics, and astute political maneuvering gradually eroded Mughal authority, drained its resources, and ultimately contributed to its fragmentation. While the Third Battle of Panipat inflicted a severe blow, the Marathas had already fundamentally altered the political landscape of India, paving the way for the rise of new powers, including the British. The Maratha challenge serves as a compelling example of how a determined and adaptable force can dismantle even the most formidable empire from within.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Swarajya
Swarajya, meaning "self-rule," was the core principle guiding Shivaji Maharaj's vision for an independent Maratha kingdom, free from Mughal domination.
Chauth & Sardeshmukhi
Chauth was a tax levied by the Marathas, equivalent to one-third of the land revenue, while Sardeshmukhi was an additional levy of one-tenth. These were initially granted by the Mughals as a form of tribute but evolved into a right of control over revenue collection.

Key Statistics

Aurangzeb spent approximately 27 years of his 49-year reign in the Deccan, primarily engaged in campaigns against the Marathas. (Source: Satish Chandra, Medieval India, 2009)

Source: Satish Chandra, Medieval India, 2009

By the mid-18th century, the Maratha Confederacy controlled approximately 60% of the former Mughal territories. (Source: Advanced Study in History for Civil Services & Competitive Examination by Jaswant Singh)

Source: Jaswant Singh, Advanced Study in History for Civil Services & Competitive Examination

Examples

Sack of Surat (1664)

The Maratha raid on the wealthy port city of Surat in 1664, a major Mughal trading center, demonstrated their ability to strike at the heart of Mughal economic interests and highlighted the empire’s vulnerability to guerilla attacks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why were the Marathas so successful against the Mughals?

The Marathas’ success stemmed from their mastery of guerilla warfare, their intimate knowledge of the terrain, strong leadership (Shivaji, Peshwas), and the inherent weaknesses of the Mughal administrative and military systems, particularly during Aurangzeb’s prolonged Deccan campaigns.

Topics Covered

Medieval HistoryIndian HistoryMaratha ExpansionMughal DeclineMilitary ConflictsPolitical Rivalry