Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The brutal act described in the question involves a series of heinous crimes, raising complex legal questions regarding the offences committed by 'M'. Indian criminal law, primarily codified in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), addresses such acts with specific provisions. The gravity of the situation necessitates a careful examination of the sequence of events – the initial assault, the murder, and the subsequent rape – to determine the applicable offences and their corresponding punishments. This analysis will focus on the relevant sections of the IPC and their interpretation in light of the given facts.
Offences Committed by 'M'
Based on the facts presented, 'M' has committed the following offences:
1. Kidnapping/Abduction (Section 355 & 363 IPC)
Initially, 'M' held 'G' and dragged her to a nearby bush. This act constitutes kidnapping or abduction. Section 355 IPC deals with assault with intent to commit wrongful confinement. While the initial act involves assault, the subsequent dragging indicates an intent to confine her unlawfully. Section 363 IPC defines abduction, which includes taking a woman away from her guardian or against her will. Given that 'G' was forcibly taken, Section 363 is applicable. The punishment for abduction can range from imprisonment up to seven years, and also a fine.
2. Murder (Section 302 IPC)
The act of slitting 'G's throat, resulting in her death, clearly falls under the definition of murder as per Section 302 IPC. Section 302 states that whoever commits murder shall be punished with death or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine. The prosecution would need to prove that 'M' had the intention (mens rea) to cause 'G's death, which is evident from the deliberate act of slitting her throat. This is the most serious offence committed by 'M'.
3. Rape (Section 376 IPC)
After killing 'G', 'M' raped her. This constitutes the offence of rape as defined under Section 376 IPC. The definition of rape has undergone amendments over time, particularly after the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, which broadened the scope of the offence and increased the punishment. Section 376 IPC prescribes imprisonment of not less than seven years, which may extend to imprisonment for life, and also a fine. The fact that the victim was already deceased does not negate the offence of rape; it may even be considered an aggravating factor during sentencing.
4. Outraging Modesty (Section 354 IPC)
Even if the act of rape is proven under Section 376, the initial act of holding her and shutting her mouth could also be considered outraging her modesty under Section 354 IPC. This section deals with assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty. The punishment for this offence is imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both.
5. Destruction of Evidence (Section 201 IPC)
While not directly stated, it can be inferred that 'M' may have attempted to conceal the crime or destroy evidence. Section 201 IPC deals with causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen the offender. If 'M' attempted to hide the body or clean the scene, this section could be applicable.
Relevant Statutory Provisions in Detail
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) – Key Sections
- Section 302: Murder – Defines murder and prescribes the punishment of death or life imprisonment.
- Section 363: Abduction – Defines abduction and prescribes imprisonment up to seven years with fine.
- Section 376: Rape – Defines rape and prescribes imprisonment of not less than seven years, which may extend to life imprisonment, with fine.
- Section 354: Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty – Prescribes imprisonment up to two years, or fine, or both.
- Section 201: Causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen the offender – Prescribes imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both.
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
This amendment significantly strengthened the laws relating to offences against women, including rape. It broadened the definition of rape, introduced more stringent punishments, and addressed issues of custodial rape and acid attacks. The amendment also clarified that sexual assault on a deceased person is punishable as rape.
Conclusion
In conclusion, 'M' has committed a series of grave offences, including kidnapping/abduction, murder, and rape, as defined under the Indian Penal Code. The severity of these crimes warrants the maximum punishment permissible under the law. The case highlights the urgent need for effective law enforcement, swift prosecution, and robust measures to prevent such heinous acts. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, plays a crucial role in addressing crimes against women, but continuous efforts are needed to ensure the safety and security of all citizens.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.