Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-II202410 Marks150 Words
Q2.

Discuss why the railway system developed by the East India Company went against the Indian interest.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the historical context of railway development in India under the East India Company (EIC). The answer should focus on how the railway network was primarily designed to serve British economic and strategic interests, rather than fostering Indian industrial growth or benefiting the Indian population. Key areas to cover include the motivations behind railway construction, the financial arrangements, the impact on Indian industries, and the resulting economic drain. A structured approach – outlining the EIC’s objectives, detailing the negative consequences, and concluding with a summary – is recommended.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The introduction of railways in India, commencing in 1853 with the first passenger train between Bombay and Thane, is often portrayed as a modernizing force. However, a closer examination reveals that the railway system developed by the East India Company was fundamentally geared towards serving British imperial interests, rather than promoting Indian economic development. The railways weren’t conceived as a public utility for the benefit of Indians, but as a tool for consolidating control, facilitating resource extraction, and creating markets for British manufactured goods. This resulted in a system that actively hindered indigenous industrial growth and contributed to the economic drain of India.

Motivations Behind Railway Development

The EIC’s primary motivations for building railways were not developmental. They were driven by:

  • Strategic Control: To consolidate political control over India, particularly after the 1857 Revolt. Railways facilitated troop movement and swift suppression of uprisings.
  • Resource Extraction: To efficiently transport raw materials like cotton, jute, coal, and minerals from the Indian hinterland to ports for export to Britain.
  • Market Access: To create a vast internal market for British manufactured goods, undermining local industries.
  • Investment Opportunities: The railway construction provided lucrative investment opportunities for British capital, guaranteed by the Indian government.

Financial Arrangements and Economic Drain

The financial structure of the railway system exacerbated the negative impact on India:

  • Guaranteed Returns: The EIC offered guaranteed returns (typically 5%) on capital invested by British companies, regardless of the railway’s profitability. This meant Indian revenues were used to subsidize British investors.
  • Import of Materials: A significant portion of railway materials – iron, steel, locomotives, and skilled labor – were imported from Britain, further draining Indian wealth. Indigenous industries capable of producing these goods were deliberately neglected.
  • Debt Burden: The massive railway construction led to a substantial increase in India’s public debt, primarily owed to British creditors.

Impact on Indian Industries

The railway system had a detrimental effect on several Indian industries:

  • Decline of Handicrafts: The easy availability of cheaper, machine-made British goods, facilitated by the railways, led to the decline of traditional Indian handicrafts and textile industries.
  • Stagnation of Indigenous Iron & Steel: The import of British iron and steel stifled the growth of indigenous iron and steel industries.
  • Agricultural Distress: While railways facilitated the transport of agricultural produce, they also led to the commercialization of agriculture, often forcing farmers into debt cycles and increasing their vulnerability to market fluctuations.

Discriminatory Practices

The railway network was designed with a clear bias towards British interests:

  • Port Connectivity: Rail lines were primarily constructed to connect ports with the interior, prioritizing the export of raw materials.
  • Neglect of Inland Trade: Development of lines facilitating inland trade and connecting different parts of India was comparatively neglected.
  • Freight Policies: Freight rates were often discriminatory, favoring the transport of British goods and disadvantaging Indian traders.
Aspect British Interest Indian Interest
Investment Profit for British Companies (Guaranteed 5% return) Investment in indigenous industries
Materials Import from Britain Procurement from Indian industries
Freight Prioritized export of raw materials Facilitated internal trade and agricultural diversification

Conclusion

In conclusion, the railway system developed by the East India Company, while presenting a facade of modernization, was fundamentally designed to serve British imperial and economic interests. The guaranteed returns, import of materials, and discriminatory practices led to a significant economic drain from India and actively hindered the development of indigenous industries. The railways, therefore, became a tool for perpetuating colonial exploitation rather than fostering genuine economic progress for the Indian population. A critical reassessment of this historical narrative is crucial for understanding the long-term economic consequences of colonial rule.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Evaluate your handwritten answer in under a minute

Free trial available • Trusted by 1,00,000+ aspirants

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Drain of Wealth
The 'Drain of Wealth' refers to the transfer of economic resources from India to Britain during the colonial period, primarily through trade imbalances, salaries of British officials, and interest payments on debt.
Imperial Preference
A system of trade tariffs and policies favoring trade within the British Empire, which further disadvantaged Indian industries by restricting access to markets outside the empire and promoting reliance on British goods.

Key Statistics

Between 1853 and 1880, approximately 8.5 million miles of railway track were laid in India, costing over £850 million, largely financed by British capital. (Source: Dharma Kumar, *The Cambridge Economic History of India, Vol. 2*)

Source: Dharma Kumar, *The Cambridge Economic History of India, Vol. 2*

By 1900, over 25,000 miles of railway track had been laid in India, but the per capita railway mileage was significantly lower than in developed countries like Britain and the United States. (Knowledge cutoff: 2023)

Source: Various historical economic surveys of British India

Examples

Decline of the Indian Textile Industry

The influx of cheaper, machine-made textiles from Britain, facilitated by the railways, led to the decline of the once-thriving Indian textile industry, particularly in regions like Dhaka and Surat. This resulted in widespread unemployment and economic hardship for weavers.

Frequently Asked Questions

▶Did the railways have *no* positive impact on India?

While primarily exploitative, the railways did have some limited positive effects, such as facilitating the movement of people and goods, and contributing to administrative efficiency. However, these benefits were overshadowed by the negative consequences for the Indian economy and industries.

Topics Covered

HistoryEconomyColonial HistoryRailwaysEconomic Impact
Back to all ECONOMICS-PAPER-II 2024 questions