UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-I202415 Marks250 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q18.

Despite comprehensive policies for equity and social justice, underprivileged sections are not yet getting the full benefits of affirmative action envisaged by the Constitution. Comment.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of affirmative action in India, its constitutional basis, and the reasons for its limited success in reaching the intended beneficiaries. The answer should begin by defining affirmative action and its constitutional roots. Then, it should analyze the barriers faced by underprivileged sections – socio-economic, systemic, and implementation-related. Finally, it should suggest measures to improve the effectiveness of these policies. A structure of Introduction, Barriers (Socio-economic, Systemic, Implementation), and Way Forward would be ideal.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Affirmative action, also known as reservation, is a set of policies and practices designed to address past and present discrimination against historically disadvantaged groups, aiming to create a more equitable society. In India, these policies are rooted in Articles 15(4), 15(5), and 16(4) of the Constitution, which allow the state to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes (SCs), and Scheduled Tribes (STs). Despite decades of these constitutional provisions and numerous policies, the full benefits of affirmative action have not reached all underprivileged sections, leading to persistent inequalities and a gap between policy intent and ground reality. Recent debates surrounding the economic criteria for reservation (EWS quota) highlight the ongoing challenges in achieving true equity.

Barriers to Effective Affirmative Action

1. Socio-Economic Barriers

Despite reservation, underprivileged sections often face significant socio-economic disadvantages that hinder their ability to fully utilize the opportunities provided. These include:

  • Poor Quality of Education: Many students from disadvantaged backgrounds attend schools with inadequate infrastructure, unqualified teachers, and limited resources, putting them at a disadvantage in competitive examinations.
  • Lack of Access to Coaching: Quality coaching centers for competitive exams are often expensive and inaccessible to students from economically weaker sections.
  • Social Stigma and Discrimination: Despite legal protections, social discrimination persists, impacting access to opportunities and creating psychological barriers.
  • Intergenerational Poverty: Cycles of poverty limit access to healthcare, nutrition, and education, perpetuating disadvantage across generations.

2. Systemic Barriers

The existing systems and structures often perpetuate inequalities, undermining the effectiveness of affirmative action:

  • Limited Scope of Reservation: Reservation primarily focuses on educational institutions and government jobs, leaving out significant sectors like the private sector.
  • Creamy Layer Exclusion: While the ‘creamy layer’ concept aims to ensure benefits reach the most deserving, its implementation has been inconsistent and often contested. (Indra Sawhney v. Union of India, 1992 established the concept of creamy layer).
  • Ineffective Implementation of Land Reforms: Failure to effectively implement land reforms has left many SC/ST communities landless and economically vulnerable.
  • Caste-Based Social Capital: Existing social networks and power structures often favor dominant castes, limiting the upward mobility of marginalized groups.

3. Implementation Challenges

Weaknesses in the implementation of affirmative action policies further exacerbate the problem:

  • Data Gaps: Lack of accurate and updated data on the socio-economic conditions of different communities hinders effective targeting of benefits. The Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC) 2011, despite its limitations, highlighted the extent of deprivation.
  • Corruption and Leakage: Corruption in the implementation of welfare schemes and reservation policies leads to leakage of benefits and reduces their impact.
  • Lack of Awareness: Many eligible beneficiaries are unaware of their rights and the available benefits due to lack of awareness campaigns.
  • Judicial Challenges: Frequent legal challenges to reservation policies create uncertainty and delay their implementation.

Addressing the Challenges: Way Forward

To ensure that underprivileged sections truly benefit from affirmative action, a multi-pronged approach is needed:

  • Investing in Quality Education: Improving the quality of education in government schools, providing scholarships, and expanding access to coaching facilities are crucial.
  • Expanding the Scope of Reservation: Exploring the possibility of extending reservation to the private sector, with appropriate safeguards, could create more opportunities.
  • Strengthening Implementation: Improving data collection, ensuring transparency in implementation, and strengthening grievance redressal mechanisms are essential.
  • Promoting Social Inclusion: Addressing social stigma and discrimination through awareness campaigns and promoting inter-caste harmony are vital.
  • Empowering Local Self-Governments: Strengthening the role of Panchayats and Municipalities in identifying and addressing the needs of marginalized communities.

Conclusion

Despite the constitutional mandate and numerous policies, affirmative action in India remains incomplete. The persistence of socio-economic barriers, systemic inequalities, and implementation challenges prevents underprivileged sections from fully realizing the benefits intended for them. A holistic approach that addresses these issues through improved education, expanded scope of reservation, strengthened implementation, and promotion of social inclusion is crucial to achieving true equity and social justice. Moving beyond mere reservation towards empowerment and capacity building is the key to unlocking the potential of all citizens.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Affirmative Action
A set of policies and practices designed to address past and present discrimination against historically disadvantaged groups, aiming to create a more equitable society. It can include measures like reservation, scholarships, and targeted welfare programs.
Creamy Layer
The economically advanced sections within a backward class who are excluded from the benefits of reservation. The concept was introduced to ensure that reservation benefits reach the most deserving within the backward classes.

Key Statistics

According to the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) 70th round (2012), the average monthly per capita consumption expenditure (MPCE) of Scheduled Castes was lower than that of other social groups.

Source: NSSO Report No. 582, 2012

As of 2023, reservation in central government jobs is 15% for SCs, 7.5% for STs, and 27% for OBCs (excluding the creamy layer). Additionally, 10% reservation is provided for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS).

Source: Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), Government of India (as of knowledge cutoff)

Examples

Rohith Vemula Case

The suicide of Rohith Vemula, a PhD scholar at the University of Hyderabad in 2016, sparked a national debate about caste discrimination in educational institutions and the effectiveness of affirmative action policies in protecting marginalized students.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is reservation the only solution to address social inequality?

No, reservation is just one component of a broader strategy. Addressing social inequality requires a multi-faceted approach that includes investments in education, healthcare, economic empowerment, and social justice initiatives.

Topics Covered

Social IssuesGovernanceIndian PolitySocial JusticeReservation PolicyConstitutional ProvisionsEquality