Naxalite Operations and Tribal Conflict

With multipronged strategy of the Central and State Governments specially in the last few years, the naxalite problem has been resolved to a large extent in the affected states of the country. However, there are a few pockets in certain states where naxalite problem still persists, mainly due to involvement of foreign countries. Raman is posted as SP (Special Operations) for the last one year, in one of the districts which is still affected by the naxalite problem. The district administration has taken a lot of developmental works in the recent past in the naxalite affected areas to win the hearts and minds of the people. Over a period of time, Rohit has established an excellent intelligence network to get the real time information regarding the movement of naxalite cadre. To instill confidence in the public and have moral ascendancy over the naxalites, a number of cordons and search operations are being conducted by the police. Rohit, who himself was leading one of the contingents got a message though his intelligence source that about ten hard core naxalites were hiding in a particular village with sophisticated weapons. Without wasting any time, Rohit reached the target village with his team and laid out a foolproof cordon and started carrying out a systematic search. During the search, his team managed to overpower all the naxalites along with their automatic weapons. However, in the meantime, more than five hundred tribal women surrounded the village and started marching towards the target house. They were shouting and demanding the immediate release of insurgents since they are their protectors and saviours. The situation on the ground was becoming very critical as the tribal women were extremely agitated and aggressive. Rohit tried to contact his superior officer, IG (Special Operations) of the state on the radio set and on mobile phone, but failed to do so due to poor connectivity. Rohit was in great dilemma since out of the naxalites apprehended, two were not only hard core top insurgents with prize money of ₹ten lakhs on their heads, but were also involved in a recent ambush on the security forces. However, if he did not release the naxalites, the situation could get out of control since the tribal women were aggressively charging towards them. In that case, to control the situation Rohit might have to resort to firing which may lead to valuable loss of lives of civilians and would further complicate the situation. (a) Discuss all options available to the District Collector as a District Magistrate. (b) What suitable actions can be taken in view of mutually compatible interests of the stakeholders ? (c) What are the potential administrative and ethical dilemmas for the District Collector?

How to Approach

This question is a classic ethical dilemma framed within a law and order context. The approach should involve identifying the stakeholders, analyzing the ethical principles at play (duty, compassion, justice, consequences), and evaluating the available options. The answer should be structured around the District Magistrate’s (DM) role, outlining possible actions, considering stakeholder interests, and acknowledging the administrative and ethical challenges. A balanced approach demonstrating sensitivity to both security concerns and tribal rights is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Naxalite problem, rooted in socio-economic disparities and historical grievances, continues to pose a challenge to India’s internal security. While significant progress has been made through a multi-pronged strategy involving security forces and developmental initiatives, pockets of insurgency persist, often fueled by complex local dynamics and, as alleged, external influences. This case study presents a critical situation where a SP’s actions, aimed at curbing Naxalism, are challenged by the strong emotional response of the local tribal community, creating a dilemma for the District Magistrate who is also the District Collector. The situation demands a nuanced understanding of the law, ethical considerations, and the socio-political context.

(a) Options Available to the District Collector as District Magistrate

As District Magistrate, the Collector possesses significant powers under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and other relevant laws. The options available are:

Negotiation & Mediation: Immediately attempt to negotiate with the tribal women, understanding their concerns and attempting to de-escalate the situation. This involves empathetic listening and assuring them of a fair investigation.
Section 144 CrPC: Impose Section 144 CrPC, prohibiting the assembly of five or more persons in the area, to prevent further escalation and potential violence. This needs to be done cautiously, considering the potential for further agitation.
Use of Force (as a last resort): If negotiation fails and the situation becomes uncontrollable, authorize the police to use proportionate force, adhering to the guidelines laid down in the Police Act and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) guidelines. This is the least desirable option due to the risk of civilian casualties.
Seeking Reinforcements: Request reinforcements from neighboring districts or the state government to manage the crowd and maintain law and order.
Temporary Release with Conditions: Consider a temporary release of the apprehended Naxalites with strict conditions (e.g., reporting to the police daily, restrictions on movement) to buy time and facilitate negotiations.
Legal Recourse: Initiate legal proceedings against the Naxalites while simultaneously addressing the concerns of the tribal community through dialogue and confidence-building measures.

(b) Suitable Actions Considering Mutually Compatible Interests

The most suitable action involves a combination of strategies prioritizing dialogue and minimizing harm. The following steps can be taken:

Immediate Dialogue: The DM should personally engage with the tribal women, acknowledging their concerns and explaining the legal basis for the arrests. Emphasize that the Naxalites exploit their vulnerabilities.
Community Leaders’ Involvement: Involve respected tribal leaders and elders in the negotiation process to act as mediators and build trust.
Transparency & Investigation: Promise a transparent investigation into the allegations against the Naxalites and ensure due process of law.
Addressing Grievances: Commit to addressing the underlying socio-economic grievances that drive people towards Naxalism. This includes accelerating developmental projects, improving access to education and healthcare, and ensuring fair compensation for land acquisition.
Conditional Release (with safeguards): If the situation is extremely volatile, consider a conditional release of the less-hardcore Naxalites, while ensuring the top insurgents remain in custody. This can be coupled with a commitment to address the community’s concerns.

(c) Potential Administrative and Ethical Dilemmas for the District Collector

The District Collector faces several administrative and ethical dilemmas:

Rule of Law vs. Public Order: Balancing the need to uphold the rule of law (by prosecuting criminals) with the need to maintain public order and prevent violence.
Justice vs. Compassion: Weighing the demands of justice (punishing those involved in violent acts) against the need for compassion and understanding towards the tribal community.
Duty to the State vs. Duty to Citizens: Balancing the duty to protect the state from insurgency with the duty to protect the rights and welfare of all citizens, including the tribal population.
Potential for Escalation: Any decision carries the risk of escalating the conflict, either through increased Naxalite activity or through further unrest among the tribal community.
Accountability & Transparency: Ensuring accountability for any use of force and maintaining transparency in the decision-making process.
Influence of External Factors: The alleged involvement of foreign countries adds another layer of complexity, requiring coordination with intelligence agencies and potentially diplomatic efforts.

The Collector must exercise sound judgment, prioritize the safety of all stakeholders, and act in a manner that promotes long-term peace and stability in the region.

Conclusion

This case highlights the complex interplay between security, development, and social justice in addressing the Naxalite problem. A purely security-centric approach is unlikely to succeed without addressing the underlying socio-economic grievances and building trust with the local community. The District Collector’s role is crucial in navigating this delicate balance, prioritizing dialogue, upholding the rule of law, and ensuring the protection of all citizens. A long-term solution requires a holistic approach that combines effective law enforcement with sustainable development and inclusive governance.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Evaluate your handwritten answer in under a minute

Free trial available • Trusted by 1,00,000+ aspirants

Additional Resources

Key Statistics

As of 2023, Naxalite-affected districts are spread across 10 states, with Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha, and Maharashtra being the most affected. (Source: Ministry of Home Affairs, Annual Report 2023-24)

Source: Ministry of Home Affairs, Annual Report 2023-24

According to data from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), there has been a significant decline in Naxalite-related violence in India since 2010, but incidents continue to occur in certain districts. (Source: NCRB data, as of knowledge cutoff 2023)

Source: National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB)

Examples

Operation Green Hunt

Launched in 2009, Operation Green Hunt was a large-scale coordinated operation by Indian security forces to flush out Naxalites from their strongholds. While it led to some successes in terms of reducing Naxalite influence, it also faced criticism for alleged human rights violations and displacement of tribal communities.

Frequently Asked Questions

▶What is the role of the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) in Naxalite-affected areas?

CAPFs like the CRPF, BSF, and ITBP provide support to state police forces in conducting anti-Naxal operations, providing security to developmental projects, and establishing a security grid in affected areas. They often operate in coordination with state police and intelligence agencies.

Topics Covered

EthicsCase Study

Back to all GENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-IV 2024 questions