Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Isostasy, derived from the Greek words ‘isos’ (equal) and ‘stasis’ (standstill), refers to the state of gravitational equilibrium between the Earth’s lithosphere and asthenosphere. This equilibrium dictates that the crust ‘floats’ on the denser, plastic mantle below. The ‘depth of compensation’ is a theoretical depth below the Earth’s surface where the pressure exerted by the weight of the crust is exactly balanced by the buoyant upthrust from the mantle. The statement posits that at this depth, the pressure generated by all overlying landmass substances is uniform. This concept is supported by several hypotheses, primarily the Airy and Pratt hypotheses, which attempt to explain how the Earth achieves this isostatic balance.
Understanding Isostasy and Depth of Compensation
The Earth’s crust is not uniform in density or thickness. Mountain ranges, continental shields, and oceanic basins all represent variations in crustal structure. These variations create imbalances in gravitational forces. Isostasy explains how the crust adjusts to maintain equilibrium. The depth of compensation is crucial because it represents the level at which these adjustments result in equal pressure across the Earth.
The Airy Hypothesis
Proposed by Sir George Airy in 1855, the Airy hypothesis, also known as the root hypothesis, suggests that the crust is composed of material of relatively uniform density. Variations in elevation are explained by differences in the thickness of the crust. Mountains, for example, have deep ‘roots’ extending into the mantle, analogous to an iceberg floating in water. The greater the height of the mountain above sea level, the deeper its root.
- Principle: Crustal blocks of equal density ‘float’ with different heights depending on their thickness.
- Assumption: Crustal material has a constant density.
- Implication: Areas with high elevation have thicker crustal roots.
The Airy hypothesis effectively explains regional isostatic adjustments, such as those observed after glacial unloading (post-glacial rebound). However, it struggles to explain isostatic anomalies where areas with similar elevations have different crustal thicknesses.
The Pratt Hypothesis
Proposed by Joseph Pratt in 1861, the Pratt hypothesis, also known as the density hypothesis, proposes that the crust is composed of materials of varying densities. Elevation differences are attributed to variations in the density of the crustal rocks. Denser rocks underlie higher elevations, while less dense rocks underlie lower elevations.
- Principle: Crustal blocks of varying density ‘float’ at different heights.
- Assumption: Crustal density varies laterally.
- Implication: Areas with high elevation have denser crustal material.
The Pratt hypothesis is better at explaining local isostatic anomalies and variations in gravity. However, it doesn’t adequately explain the large-scale regional adjustments observed after glacial unloading, where crustal thickness changes are more significant than density variations.
Comparative Analysis: Airy vs. Pratt
| Feature | Airy Hypothesis | Pratt Hypothesis |
|---|---|---|
| Density | Constant | Variable |
| Thickness | Variable | Constant |
| Elevation Explanation | Crustal root thickness | Crustal density |
| Regional Adjustments | Well explained (e.g., post-glacial rebound) | Poorly explained |
| Local Anomalies | Poorly explained | Well explained |
Modern Views on Isostasy
Modern understanding recognizes that both Airy and Pratt mechanisms operate simultaneously and contribute to isostatic equilibrium. The concept of ‘dynamic isostasy’ acknowledges that isostatic adjustments are not static but are influenced by dynamic processes within the mantle, such as convection currents. Furthermore, the lithosphere isn’t perfectly rigid; it exhibits flexural strength, meaning it can bend and deform under load, influencing isostatic responses. Recent studies using satellite gravity data (e.g., GRACE mission) provide more refined insights into isostatic compensation patterns globally.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the statement regarding equal pressure at the depth of compensation is supported by the principles of isostasy, primarily explained through the Airy and Pratt hypotheses. While each hypothesis has its limitations, they collectively contribute to our understanding of how the Earth’s crust maintains gravitational equilibrium. Modern views integrate both mechanisms and acknowledge the dynamic nature of isostatic adjustments, highlighting the complex interplay between the lithosphere and asthenosphere. Continued research utilizing advanced technologies will further refine our understanding of this fundamental geological process.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.